Re: Compositing app choice

2016-05-27 Thread Perry Harovas
so >> slow to crunch frames. >> >> >> >> >> ---- Original message >> From: Scott Lange <sc...@turbulenceffects.com> >> Date: 27/05/2016 10:23 (GMT-05:00) >> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com >> Subject: RE: Comp

Re: Compositing app choice

2016-05-27 Thread Javier Vega
> > > > Original message > From: Scott Lange <sc...@turbulenceffects.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sc...@turbulenceffects.com');>> > Date: 27/05/2016 10:23 (GMT-05:00) > To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','softimage@listpr

Re: Compositing app choice

2016-05-27 Thread Nono
r than Fusions imho). As a 3D space... unlike the others where 3D was >> built around the compositing.. this was built the other way around. >> shame it's so slow to crunch frames. >> >> >> >> >> Original message >> F

Re: Compositing app choice

2016-05-27 Thread Oscar Juarez
ects.com> > Date: 27/05/2016 10:23 (GMT-05:00) > To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com > Subject: RE: Compositing app choice > > > > Gotcha. > > > > > > *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto: > softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Beha

RE: Compositing app choice

2016-05-27 Thread Sven Constable
: Compositing app choice I do...I do... :) After Effects can do quite a lot. Adding scripts can do even more. I like that they open a series of .pic files with no problems. Best Regards, Stephen P. Davidson (954) 552-7956 sdavid...@3danimationmagic.com Any sufficiently advanced

Re: Compositing app choice

2016-05-27 Thread Stephen Davidson
timage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Behalf Of *Prodeep Ghosh >> *Sent:* Friday, May 27, 2016 2:41 AM >> *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com >> *Subject:* Re: Compositing app choice >> >> >> >> >> >> Fusion indeed. Still the best for freelance work.

Re: Compositing app choice

2016-05-27 Thread Stephen Davidson
.autodesk.com [mailto: > softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Behalf Of *Prodeep Ghosh > *Sent:* Friday, May 27, 2016 2:41 AM > *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com > *Subject:* Re: Compositing app choice > > > > > > Fusion indeed. Still the best for freelance work.

RE: Compositing app choice

2016-05-27 Thread Scott Lange
Gotcha. From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Greg Punchatz Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 11:10 AM To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com Subject: Re: Compositing app choice AE is good for motion graphics but not so

Re: Compositing app choice

2016-05-27 Thread Greg Punchatz
esk.com [mailto: > softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Behalf Of *Prodeep Ghosh > *Sent:* Friday, May 27, 2016 2:41 AM > *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com > *Subject:* Re: Compositing app choice > > > > > > Fusion indeed. Still the best for freelance work. > > > >

RE: Compositing app choice

2016-05-27 Thread Scott Lange
So No one uses After Effects anymore? From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Prodeep Ghosh Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 2:41 AM To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com Subject: Re: Compositing app choice Fusion indeed

Re: Compositing app choice

2016-05-27 Thread Prodeep Ghosh
the free version, it might be all you need – if so, it’s a great >> choice to have. >> >> *From:* Angus Davidson <angus.david...@wits.ac.za> >> *Sent:* Thursday, May 26, 2016 6:45 PM >> *To:* r...@casema.nl ; softimage@listproc.autodesk.com >> *Subject:* R

Re: Compositing app choice

2016-05-26 Thread Francisco Criado
6:45 PM > *To:* r...@casema.nl ; softimage@listproc.autodesk.com > *Subject:* RE: OT: Compositing app choice > > Just to echo. > > Nuke if you can afford the licenses, otherwise fusion is very good. > > Kind regards > > Angus > -- > *From:*

Re: Compositing app choice

2016-05-26 Thread Ognjen Vukovic
Angus Davidson <angus.david...@wits.ac.za> >> *Sent:* Thursday, May 26, 2016 6:45 PM >> *To:* r...@casema.nl ; softimage@listproc.autodesk.com >> *Subject:* RE: OT: Compositing app choice >> >> Just to echo. >> >> Nuke if you can afford the licenses, otherwise

Re: Compositing app choice

2016-05-26 Thread Orlando Esponda
to have. > > *From:* Angus Davidson <angus.david...@wits.ac.za> > *Sent:* Thursday, May 26, 2016 6:45 PM > *To:* r...@casema.nl ; softimage@listproc.autodesk.com > *Subject:* RE: OT: Compositing app choice > > Just to echo. > > Nuke if you can afford the license

Re: Compositing app choice

2016-05-26 Thread peter_b
of their former popularity. Do check the free version, it might be all you need – if so, it’s a great choice to have. From: Angus Davidson Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 6:45 PM To: r...@casema.nl ; softimage@listproc.autodesk.com Subject: RE: OT: Compositing app choice Just to echo. Nuke if you can

Re: OT: Compositing app choice

2016-05-26 Thread Rob Wuijster
Nuke is the most used, and it's not hard to find freelancers for it. It became the industry 'standard' at some point. But depending on your budget, I would have a look at Fusion as well. Both apps have their strengths and weaknesses I guess. Rob \/-\/\/ On

Re: OT: Compositing app choice

2016-05-26 Thread Ognjen Vukovic
Pretty much, there is always fusion if you want a similar workflow for a lot less money. On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:07 AM, David Saber wrote: > Hi people! > We need to choose a compositing app for Windows. > Some years ago, everybody was saying Nuke is the best compositing