I would love to see some 3rd-party rendering issues fixed. Softimage does
some bad stuff to UVs and Vertex Colors, etc. when exporting subdivided
meshes. For the people at Autodesk, I'm talking about SOFT-9244 and SOFT-
9630.
I also found another bug reported in Arnold that I don't know if it's fi
I got the following from Eric concerning the emRoads tool crashing in 2015
Hi Phil,
the exact cause of the crash is the following:
These two functions crash in Softimage 2015 and Softimage 2015 SP1:
X3DObject::.GetProperties().Find()
X3DObject::GetPropertyFromName()
The above functions are ne
ay, September 17, 2015 2:19 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
Subject: Re: SP2???
I'm waiting for that too. Please AD, do it. 2015 SP1 has a few things to fix. :)
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Leendert A. Hartog
mailto:hirazib...@live.nl><mai
s, there is another one coming soon.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hsiao Ming
>>
>> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
>> [mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Tenshi .
>> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 2:19 AM
>> To: softimage@listproc.
o:
>> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Tenshi .
>> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 2:19 AM
>> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
>> Subject: Re: SP2???
>>
>> I'm waiting for that too. Please AD, do it. 2015 SP1 has a few things to
>&g
> Thanks,
> Hsiao Ming
>
> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Tenshi .
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 2:19 AM
> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: Re: SP2???
>
> I'm waiting
On 09/24/15 19:47, Phil Harbath wrote:
There
was a problem that broke the roads feature in emtopology in
2015, not sure if Eric conveyed that to them.
Could that be another case of an in-compo
one will be the last ever, will it not?)
it would be nice to go out with a tiny bang
-Original Message-
From: Matt Lind
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 1:26 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: SP2???
You realize any major 3D application has literally thousands of act
There was a problem that broke the roads feature in emtopology in 2015, not
sure if Eric conveyed that to them.
-Original Message-
From: "Matt Lind"
Sent: 9/24/2015 7:26 PM
To: "softimage@listproc.autodesk.com"
Subject: Re: SP2???
You realize any major 3D appli
s and ensure features
that currently work do not regress. Basically, just the stuff I reported.
The rest is unimportant ;-)
Matt
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:21:01 +0200
From:
Subject: Re: SP2???
To:
likely last softimage SP ever, so if it leaves one bug alive, it?s not
enough...
From:
pete...@skynet.be
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 4:21 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: SP2???
likely last softimage SP ever, so if it leaves one bug alive, it’s not enough...
From: Cesar Saez
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 11:04 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk
likely last softimage SP ever, so if it leaves one bug alive, it’s not enough...
From: Cesar Saez
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 11:04 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: SP2???
Prepare yourself to read people complaining about the lack of new
features/bugfixes on SP2
Prepare yourself to read people complaining about the lack of new
features/bugfixes on SP2... Tough crowd :)
ya, that was/is lame
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Phil Harbath
wrote:
> Here's hoping I don't need to install previous version first, never got
> around to it last time for that reason.
>
Here's hoping I don't need to install previous version first, never got around
to it last time for that reason.
-Original Message-
From: "Pierre Schiller"
Sent: 9/22/2015 12:42 PM
To: "softimage@listproc.autodesk.com"
Subject: Re: SP2???
BEST NEWS toda
gt;> Hsiao Ming
>>
>> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
>> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Tenshi .
>> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 2:19 AM
>> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
>> Subject: Re: SP2???
>>
>>
.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Tenshi .
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 2:19 AM
> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: Re: SP2???
>
> I'm waiting for that too. Please AD, do it. 2015 SP1 has a few things to
> fix. :)
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Leendert
t;> Wonderful news.
>>
>>
>>
>> Original message
>> From: Hsiao Ming Chia
>> Date: 17/09/2015 01:20 (GMT-05:00)
>> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
>> Subject: RE: SP2???
>>
>> Yes, there is another one coming soon
c.autodesk.com
> Subject: RE: SP2???
>
> Yes, there is another one coming soon.
>
> Thanks,
> Hsiao Ming
>
> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [
> mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
> ] On Behalf Of Tenshi .
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 201
Wonderful news.
Original message
From: Hsiao Ming Chia
Date: 17/09/2015 01:20 (GMT-05:00)
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: SP2???
Yes, there is another one coming soon.
Thanks,
Hsiao Ming
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage
: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: SP2???
I'm waiting for that too. Please AD, do it. 2015 SP1 has a few things to fix. :)
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Leendert A. Hartog
mailto:hirazib...@live.nl>> wrote:
I might have missed the announcement, if so, sorry, but can we sti
Yes, there is another one coming soon.
Thanks,
Hsiao Ming
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Tenshi .
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 2:19 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: SP2???
I'm waiting for
I'm waiting for that too. Please AD, do it. 2015 SP1 has a few things to
fix. :)
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Leendert A. Hartog
wrote:
> I might have missed the announcement, if so, sorry, but can we still
> expect a Softimage 2015 Service Pack 2 and if so, when will it be released?
>
> Gre
Same here. new compiled plugins loads in SP2 but not in SP1.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Nicolas Burtnyk wrote:
> 2014 SP2 *does* have API changes, even to the extent that plugins compiled
> against 2014 SP1 are not loadable in 2014 SP2.
>
> Our installer got broken by the weirdness in vers
@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: SP2
looks alright to me.
the build number change tell me SP2 is indistinguishable from SP1
except it's got some code change that caused 5 builds but dont affect
API or scene file. However, if SP1 is indeed a 11.1 instead of 11.0,
then there must have been API chan
2014 SP2 *does* have API changes, even to the extent that plugins compiled
against 2014 SP1 are not loadable in 2014 SP2.
Our installer got broken by the weirdness in version numbers. In all
versions back to 2011 (and probably before that), the "minor" version
referred to the SP#, i.e. 2011 SP2 i
Well, my apologies too, the e-mail was likely way too snappy.
It's just I'm getting very, very tired of seeing mailing lists turning so
dark. What prominent private lists there are see every industry discussion
quickly turn into union VS anti-union, or subsidies discussions or the
inactions of VES.
looks alright to me.
the build number change tell me SP2 is indistinguishable from SP1
except it's got some code change that caused 5 builds but dont affect
API or scene file. However, if SP1 is indeed a 11.1 instead of 11.0,
then there must have been API change or something that affects the
versi
: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: SP2
An SP and a hotfix are a million miles apart, and there is a definition to
both, and their impact on software versioning IS important when you have to
manage the software park.
A hotfix is an emergency patching deployed (potentially and often
An SP and a hotfix are a million miles apart, and there is a definition to
both, and their impact on software versioning IS important when you have to
manage the software park.
A hotfix is an emergency patching deployed (potentially and often with
little testing) to immediately fix something in pl
Naming software after their correct versions sells them not quite as good as
numbers in years for example. At least for the people in marketing
devisions. The fact that versioning was (and is) always strictly ruled by
certain changes, is something marketing monkeys seems to have a problem
with. So
0.0.05 rather
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Hans Payer wrote:
> Please someone explain,
>
> How does naming a release SP2 compare to SP1 has a version number
> increment of 0.0.03?
>
> 2014 SP1 = 12.1.94
> 2014 SP2 = 12.1.99
>
> Should itnot have been at least 12.2.xx?
>
> You can blame my
32 matches
Mail list logo
