Chris Hostetter wrote:
what do you guys think?
I'm going to spend some time today looking at the Solr source and
matching your suggestions to it, hopefully I'll be more able to give a
slightly more considered opinion after that ;-)
I'm in the process of evaluating what we are going to do
On Jan 8, 2007, at 4:58 AM, Alan Burlison wrote:
I'm in the process of evaluating what we are going to do with the
search functionality for http://opensolaris.org, and at the moment
Solr is my first choice to replace what we already have - *if* it
can be made to handle disparate data
Erik Hatcher wrote:
There really is no question of if Solr can be made to handle it. :)
The if was a tuits if, not a technical if ;-)
POSTing an encoded binary document in XML will work, and it certainly
will work to have Solr unencode it and parse it.
Yes, but the bits aren't there to
On Jan 8, 2007, at 5:45 AM, Alan Burlison wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
The Lucene in Action codebase has a DocumentHandler interface that
could be used for this, which has implementations for Word, PDF,
HTML, RTF, and some others. It's simplistic, so it might not be
of value specifically.
Rakefile now supports functional and unit tests
---
Key: SOLR-97
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-97
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: clients - ruby -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bertrand Delacretaz updated SOLR-20:
Component/s: (was: update)
clients - java
A simple Java client with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-30?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bertrand Delacretaz updated SOLR-30:
Component/s: (was: search)
clients - java
Java client code for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-51?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bertrand Delacretaz updated SOLR-51:
Summary: SolrQuery - PHP query client for Solr (was: SolrQuery)
SolrQuery - PHP query
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bertrand Delacretaz updated SOLR-50:
Summary: SolrUpdate - PHP update client for Solr (was: SolrUpdate)
SolrUpdate - PHP update
: I would like to know if there is a way to support prefix, phrase, etc queries
: in solr. I know that the queries, such as solr* and solr would do the
trick,
: but I am looking for a solution similar to the SolrQueryParser defaultOperator
: setting (with q.op={OR|AND} or in the schema config
: The design issue for this is to be clear about the schema and how
: documents are mapped into the schema. If all document types are
: mapped into the same schema, then one type of query will work
: for all. If the documents have different schemas (in the search
: index), then the query needs an
Ok, let me show an example. Assume, I want to perform the following
search: cat AND dog. I can perform it 3 different ways:
a) simply search for: cat AND dog (cat +dog)
b) search for: cat dog (assuming schema.xml has solrQueryParser
defaultOperator=AND/
c) search for: cat dog (passing q.op=AND
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-69?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463125
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-69:
---
Thanks. it works great. The only problem i ran into is a null pointer if you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-98:
-
Attachment: solr.py
simple python client
Key: SOLR-98
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463129
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-98:
--
Unless someone has a better starting point for a python client, I'll commit
this
This vote has passed, and I've just called for a vote within the Lucene PMC.
-Yonik
On 1/4/07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's time that Solr graduate from the incubator and become an official
Lucene subproject.
So, please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 ask Lucene PMC and the Incubator
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: The design issue for this is to be clear about the schema and how
: documents are mapped into the schema. If all document types are
: mapped into the same schema, then one type of query will work
: for all. If the documents have different schemas (in the search
:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-50:
-
Component/s: (was: update)
clients - php
SolrUpdate - PHP update client for Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-51?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-51:
-
Component/s: clients - php
SolrQuery - PHP query client for Solr
-
: Thanks for the clarification. I'm still not sure why you decided to let
: Ant control the version of JUnit that Solr gets to use (by expecting the
: JUnit JAR to be in ANT_HOME/lib). My Eclipse installation places the Ant
It wasn't an explict decision on my part, so much as the convention:
a)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik Hatcher resolved SOLR-97.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Erik Hatcher
Applied. Thanks again, Ed!
Note: be sure to svn add
21 matches
Mail list logo
