[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul updated SOLR-742:
Attachment: SOLR-742.patch
dynamic fields are added if they are present in the doc
Unable to create
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul updated SOLR-742:
Attachment: SOLR-742.patch
the old patch was wrong
Unable to create dynamic fields with custom
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12627419#action_12627419
]
Henri Biestro commented on SOLR-745:
Part of it might be in 'getAdminHandler()' which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12627419#action_12627419
]
henrib edited comment on SOLR-745 at 9/1/08 3:02 AM:
Part of it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12627468#action_12627468
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-743:
---
Neither patch will apply cleanly for some reason
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12627476#action_12627476
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-743:
---
bq. they are represented by a long and set operations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12627477#action_12627477
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-743:
---
OK, some performance results:
Setup: P4, WinXP, Java6
On Aug 31, 2008, at 8:21 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
I just realized that we are still refering to StandardRequestHandler
and DisMaxRequestHandler in the 1.3 example/solr/conf/solrconfig.xml
even though they are deprecated in favor of SearchHandler and
alternate defType values.
Do we want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Henri Biestro updated SOLR-745:
---
Attachment: solr-745.patch
Seems like this fixes it.
CoreAdminHandler in bad state after UNLOADing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12627503#action_12627503
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-743:
--
Okay, I'm surprised at the results, but I suppose they
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Akshay K. Ukey updated SOLR-617:
Attachment: 617.patch
Attached is a patch with SolrDeletionPolicy class as the default deletion
In a lot of cases we do not actually need the data included in the
header.SO we just waste bandwidth, processing to write and read this .
we should add a request parameter omitHeader=true|false . Default
should be false . If it is true let us not send the header itself
--
--Noble Paul
seems totally reasonable... i've seen some headers get pretty out of
control with parameters!
+1 (but after 1.3 please :)
Erik
On Sep 1, 2008, at 2:44 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള്
नोब्ळ् wrote:
In a lot of cases we do not actually need the data included in the
header.SO we just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12627502#action_12627502
]
henrib edited comment on SOLR-745 at 9/1/08 3:21 PM:
The uploaded
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12627551#action_12627551
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-743:
--
Any chance on sharing the test code used for that ?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12627552#action_12627552
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-743:
--
bq. As a general rule, perhaps, but advice like this has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12627558#action_12627558
]
Chris Harris commented on SOLR-538:
---
When I apply this patch, the last line of
Make it possible to omit responseheader
---
Key: SOLR-746
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-746
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: search
Affects Versions: 1.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul updated SOLR-746:
Description:
In a lot of cases we do not actually need the data included in the
header.So we just waste
: The compressed database size is 15K so we can easily put the compressed
Seriously? ... oh hell yeah, i assumed the DB was already compressed.
15+650K for the DB and driver both? ... no brainer, put them in -- it's
worth it to have an easy to use self contained demo.
Do we want to do this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12627577#action_12627577
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-745:
---
Maybe i'm missing something but haven't i seen some docs
: seems totally reasonable... i've seen some headers get pretty out of control
: with parameters!
isn't this what echoParams=none is for?
-Hoss
echoParams=none is just for params.
we can totally omit the other things too
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Chris Hostetter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: seems totally reasonable... i've seen some headers get pretty out of control
: with parameters!
isn't this what echoParams=none is for?
: echoParams=none is just for params.
: we can totally omit the other things too
I must be more out of touch with recent Solr features then i thought ... i
didn't realize there was anything else in the responseHeader.
-Hoss
24 matches
Mail list logo
