[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12737568#action_12737568
]
Ken Krugler commented on SOLR-1301:
---
Hi Jason,
Re Katta, you're right that it doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12678108#action_12678108
]
Ken Krugler commented on SOLR-1044:
---
I agree with both of Yonik's points:
# We'd first
)
-1 I doesn't make sense to automatically schedule something to be
fixed in the next version of the product.
I would be +1 on automatically setting the fix version for the
current unreleased version when an issue is resolved as fixed,
though.
-Mike
--
Ken Krugler
Krugle, Inc.
+1 530-210
to leverage Solr's
analyzer/filter support in Hibernate Search.
-- Ken
--
Ken Krugler
Krugle, Inc.
+1 530-210-6378
If you can't find it, you can't fix it
personally, but I'd hate to foist
Maven on everybody else.
-- Ken
--
Ken Krugler
Krugle, Inc.
+1 530-210-6378
If you can't find it, you can't fix it
different
access rights based on groups of users.
I had a quickly hacked app that I used to convert some of our
MoinMoin pages from their markup syntax to Confluence. If the switch
to Confluence happens, I can look around for it.
-- Ken
--
Ken Krugler
Krugle, Inc.
+1 530-210-6378
If you can't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-69?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493198
]
Ken Krugler commented on SOLR-69:
-
Ryan Brian's comments above are (I think) indicative of how most people want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12491746
]
Ken Krugler commented on SOLR-214:
--
There's some complex interplay of the content-type in the request, the charset
arguing for use of Apache Commons Logging (I've had
enough fun with that in Nutch), just commenting on the discussion
here.
-- Ken
--
Ken Krugler
Krugle, Inc.
+1 530-210-6378
Find Code, Find Answers
)... but to be useful, that
id may need to be returned in the response.
A server-set date field both makes sense *and* is easy to implement.
And then there's the auto-generated unique ID value that I'd like :)
-- Ken
--
Ken Krugler
Krugle, Inc.
+1 530-210-6378
Find Code, Find Answers
On 5/4/06, Ken Krugler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/4/06, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been thinking that Solr could benefit from auto-valued fields,
such as a datestamp. This would be a field defined in the schema,
but its value comes from the Solr server itself rather than
, versus
the jindi approach :) So I've got no special reason to ask for
ongoing support of the init-param technique.
-- Ken
On 4/19/06, Ken Krugler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Just a quick note about how I did this.
One caveat - I'm using a slightly older version of Solr, without
/browse/SOLR-9
Project: Solr
Type: Improvement
Components: search
Reporter: Ken Krugler
Priority: Minor
Currently if you send Solr a query which includes a sorting specification, and
the field you're trying to sort on is not indexed, then there's no error
response
13 matches
Mail list logo