Re: 8 for 1.4

2009-10-06 Thread Israel Ekpo
x27;t. > > Thanks, > > James > > P.S.: Since I just joined the list, I didn't know how to reply to the > thread with all the thread history attached. Sorry if this causes > problems with the mailing list. > Hi James, You almost gave me heart attack by using that su

Re: 8 for 1.4

2009-10-06 Thread James McKinney
Hi all, I only just now discovered this thread on the future of SolrJS. I'm one of the Drupal developers that worked on the SolrJS fork that we call AJAX Solr. The code is up at http://github.com/evolvingweb/AJAX-Solr Before I address some of the concerns that came up earlier in the thread, I'd ju

Re: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-29 Thread Bill Au
;>>> >>>>>> We agreed that the best steps forward are to: >>>>>> 1. Support the Drupal guys GPL port >>>>>> 2. Archive the solrjs code to solrstuff.org >>>>>> 3. Yank solrjs from apache svn (and 1.4 release) >>>

Re: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-29 Thread Bill Au
>>>>> We agreed that the best steps forward are to: >>>>> 1. Support the Drupal guys GPL port >>>>> 2. Archive the solrjs code to solrstuff.org >>>>> 3. Yank solrjs from apache svn (and 1.4 release) >>>>> 4. Add links to the drupal code (G

Re: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-29 Thread Walter Underwood
It might not be proper to use the name "Solr", because it is really "Apache Solr". At a minimum, it is misleading to use an Apache project name on GPL'ed code. I agree that changing to GPL is a bad idea. I've worked at eight or nine companies since the GPL was created, and GPL'ed code was

Re: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-29 Thread Grant Ingersoll
er Wolanin on a private thread. Begin forwarded message: From: Peter Wolanin Date: September 26, 2009 9:43:23 AM EDT To: Grant Ingersoll Subject: Re: 8 for 1.4 I talked to the guys reworking the JS library for Drupal at Drupalcon - they are also having to fork potentially around license as

Re: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-29 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Sep 29, 2009, at 4:00 AM, Matthias Epheser wrote: Grant Ingersoll schrieb: Moving to GPL doesn't seem like a good solution to me, but I don't know what else to propose. Why don't we just hold it from this release, but keep it in trunk and encourage the Drupal guys and others to submit

Re: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-29 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Matthias Epheser < matthias.ephe...@indoqa.com> wrote: > Grant Ingersoll schrieb: > >> Moving to GPL doesn't seem like a good solution to me, but I don't know >> what else to propose. Why don't we just hold it from this release, but keep >> it in trunk and encoura

Re: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-29 Thread Matthias Epheser
sound reasonable to everybody? ryan On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: Forwarded with permission from Peter Wolanin on a private thread. Begin forwarded message: From: Peter Wolanin Date: September 26, 2009 9:43:23 AM EDT To: Grant Ingersoll Subject: Re: 8 for 1.4

Re: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-28 Thread Bill Au
the drupal code (GPL) and the solrjs archive (Apache) > >> > >> Does this sound reasonable to everybody? > >> > >> ryan > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Grant Ingersoll > >> wrote: > >>> > >>

Re: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-28 Thread Ryan McKinley
a private thread. >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> From: Peter Wolanin >>>> Date: September 26, 2009 9:43:23 AM EDT >>>> To: Grant Ingersoll >>>> >>>> Subject: Re: 8 for 1.4 >>>> >>>> I ta

Re: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-28 Thread Grant Ingersoll
er Wolanin on a private thread. Begin forwarded message: From: Peter Wolanin Date: September 26, 2009 9:43:23 AM EDT To: Grant Ingersoll Subject: Re: 8 for 1.4 I talked to the guys reworking the JS library for Drupal at Drupalcon - they are also having to fork potentially around license as m

Re: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-28 Thread Bill Au
er Wolanin > >> Date: September 26, 2009 9:43:23 AM EDT > >> To: Grant Ingersoll > >> > >> Subject: Re: 8 for 1.4 > >> > >> I talked to the guys reworking the JS library for Drupal at Drupalcon > >> - they are also having to fork potent

Re: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-28 Thread Ryan McKinley
t;> From: Peter Wolanin >> Date: September 26, 2009 9:43:23 AM EDT >> To: Grant Ingersoll >> >> Subject: Re: 8 for 1.4 >> >> I talked to the guys reworking the JS library for Drupal at Drupalcon >> - they are also having to fork potentially arou

Fwd: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-28 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Forwarded with permission from Peter Wolanin on a private thread. Begin forwarded message: From: Peter Wolanin Date: September 26, 2009 9:43:23 AM EDT To: Grant Ingersoll Subject: Re: 8 for 1.4 I talked to the guys reworking the JS library for Drupal at Drupalcon - they are also having to

Re: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-28 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Yes, but no committers have stepped up and said whether the patch is any > good. The last thing I saw about the last actual patch: """this patch should enable the usage of IE8 with solrjs Tho, I didn't get it working with IE7 yet..""" I

Re: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-28 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Sep 27, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : > On S-1294, the SolrJS patch, I yet again have concerns about even including : > this, given the lack of activity (from Matthias, the original author and ... : > true for others too. At a minimum, I think S-1294 should be p

Re: Fwd: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-27 Thread Chris Hostetter
: > On S-1294, the SolrJS patch, I yet again have concerns about even including : > this, given the lack of activity (from Matthias, the original author and ... : > true for others too. At a minimum, I think S-1294 should be pushed to 1.5. : > Next up, I think we consider pulling SolrJS f

Fwd: 8 for 1.4

2009-09-25 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Argh, this was meant for solr-dev. Begin forwarded message: From: Grant Ingersoll Date: September 25, 2009 1:34:32 PM EDT To: solr-u...@lucene.apache.org Subject: 8 for 1.4 Reply-To: solr-u...@lucene.apache.org Y'all, We're down to 8 open issues: https://issues.apache.org/j