: Anyway, I think support will be good enough for 1.4 that we should
: make types like "integer" in the example schema be based on the trie
: fields. The current "integer" fields should be renamed to "pinteger"
: (for plain integer), and have a recommended use only for compatibility
: with other/
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Otis
Gospodnetic wrote:
> Would it make sense to instead add new tint(eger) type instead of renaming
> integer to pinteger? (thinking about people upgrading to Solr 1.4).
People upgrading can always use their existing schemas - remember that
the naming is local to
Message
> From: Yonik Seeley
> To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, August 2, 2009 3:01:09 PM
> Subject: trie fields default in example schema
>
> I'm working on a jumbo trie patch (just many smaller trie related
> issues at once) - SOLR-1288.
>
> Anyw
I'm working on a jumbo trie patch (just many smaller trie related
issues at once) - SOLR-1288.
Anyway, I think support will be good enough for 1.4 that we should
make types like "integer" in the example schema be based on the trie
fields. The current "integer" fields should be renamed to "pintege
