: Each element of the cached array is a ... what? The ID of the
the elements of the array are the values, the indexes into the array are
the document IDs ... esentailly it's inverted-inverted-index.
: document? (I'll be happy to answer this myself by reading the source
: code, but I'm not quite
: I don't think that will solve the relevance issues, given that the IDF
: (described at
:
http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/javadoc/org/apache/lucene/search/Similarity.html)
: is per document, not per field. In the end, though, it may be negligible.
well .. yes, but
:
:
:
: SEVERE: Exception starting filter SolrRequestFilter class
: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class
: org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig
this may be a variant of SOLR-337 ... are you sure
/var/lib/tomcat5/solr/home exists? does it contain a ./conf directory?
does
This is fairly straightforward and works well with the DisMax
handler. Indes the text into three different fields with three
different sets of analyzers. Use something like this in the
request handler:
0.01
exact^16 noaccent^4 stemmed
exact^16 no
On 5-Nov-07, at 9:05 PM, Papalagi Pakeha wrote:
Hi all,
I use Solr 1.2 on a job advertising site. I started from the default
setup that runs all documents and queries through
EnglishPorterFilterFactory. As a result for example an ad with
"accounts" in its title is matched when someone runs a qu
On 11/6/07, evol__ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. Is the "expansion" method described in the following year old post still
> the best available way to do this?
> http://www.nabble.com/newbie-Q-regarding-schema-configuration-tf1814271.html#a4956602
>
> The way I understand it, indexing these
>
Hi. Is the "expansion" method described in the following year old post still
the best available way to do this?
http://www.nabble.com/newbie-Q-regarding-schema-configuration-tf1814271.html#a4956602
The way I understand it, indexing these
First val
Less important value
would just make the
Hi all,
I use Solr 1.2 on a job advertising site. I started from the default
setup that runs all documents and queries through
EnglishPorterFilterFactory. As a result for example an ad with
"accounts" in its title is matched when someone runs a query for
"accountant" because both are stemmed to th
On 11/5/07, evol__ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a remark:
>
> Might be a good idea to change this to ./data/index to reflect the location
> that is expected in there.
./data is the generic solr data directory "index" stores the main
index under the data directory.
-Yonik
Thanks Grant. Solrconfig.xml was the first place I looked into, but somehow
missed it *scratches head*...
Just a remark:
Might be a good idea to change this to ./data/index to reflect the location
that is expected in there.
D.
Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote:
>
> Have a look at the solrconfig.xml
first: i m sure i enable php and phps in my solrconfig.xml
two: i can't get answer.
*phps:
*http://localhost:8080/solr1/select/?q=2&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&wt=phps
';
$a = file_get_contents($url);
echo 'before unserialize';
var_dump($a);
$a = unserialize($a);
echo 'after unserial
On 11/5/07, Haishan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for the first issues. The number of different phrase queries have
> performance issues I found so far are about 10.
If these are normal phrase queries (no slop), a good solution might be
to simply index and query these phrases as a single t
> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 14:55:21 -0500> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: Re: Phrase Query Performance Question
> and score threshold> > On 11/5/07, Haishan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> >
> If I limit the documents returned based on a score threshold (fi
On 5-Nov-07, at 2:22 PM, Charles Hornberger wrote:
On 11/5/07, Charles Hornberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, it seems a bit inefficient to bother allocating an array
containing an entry for each document when only some small percentage
of the documents actually contain values for the fiel
On 11/5/07, Charles Hornberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, it seems a bit inefficient to bother allocating an array
> containing an entry for each document when only some small percentage
> of the documents actually contain values for the field. Would it be
> worth investigating whether you
On 11/5/07, Kristen Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering if this is possible... I am trying to model a hierarchy of
> facets, and have a field in my xml (Category) that structured like this:
> facet1::facet2::facet3... At index time, I would like to split this
> field on the :: to popul
On 11/5/07, Haishan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I limit the documents returned based on a score threshold (filter by
> score) will it be able to improve query performance?
No.
Taking a different approach can really speed up queries though.
To figure out what approach you should take, we
Hoss,
If I limit the documents returned based on a score threshold (filter by score)
will it be able to improve query performance? My intuition is it won't be able
to because you will still have to calculate the score and then compare to the
threshold.
I know it may not be meaningful to do s
I'm attempting to set up multiple instances of Solr using JNDI (taken
from http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat). I created a new solr.xml
file in $CATALINA_HOME/conf/Catalina/localhost with:
The box is running tomcat 5.5.23, so the solr.war file is out of the
webapps path and the solr/ho
On 10/31/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the biggest factor to worry about is the number of "sources" ... the key
> to understanidng the performance risks is to understand that:
> 1) no matter how many documents do or don't have a value for a given
> field, when you sort on thta
I don't think that will solve the relevance issues, given that the IDF
(described at http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/javadoc/org/apache/lucene/search/Similarity.html)
is per document, not per field. In the end, though, it may be
negligible. Can you test it out
On 11/5/07, Yu-Hui Jin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just curious, does the default operator ( "AND" or "OR") specify the
> relationship between a field/value component or between the tokens of the
> same field/value componenet?
between any clauses in a boolean query.
> e.g. for a query like this
Did you enable the PHP serialized response writer in your solrconfig.xml? It is
not enabled by default.
Thanks,
Stu
-Original Message-
From: James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2007 9:03am
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to use PHP AND PHPS?
i know
Good points Grant. I'm envisioning my front end working so that a user would
never be able to search across all the verticals at once.
EVERY query would inject "vertical:jobs" or "vertical:news" or
"vertical:Autos", etc.. etc...
This may detrimentally affect my faceted results sets so I'll have t
One reason to consider separate indexes is in terms of relevance. Do
you want content from classifieds effecting the rankings of your news
searches? May not be an issue for you depending on your term
distributions, but might be something to consider.As you suspect,
though, having mult
500K is definitely doable with good hardware, but it also depends on
what your queries look like, how many fields you are faceting on,
etc... look at your performance now to try and judge how much
headroom you have.
-Yonik
On 11/5/07, Tim Archambault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Typical newspape
Typical newspaper site with: news, jobs, homes, autos, classifieds,
community-generated content, guestimate of .5 million documents
Do I really need to create a different solr index for each vertical? How
ineffecient is it to add a few additional fields for each content type?
Thinking of having a
i know it...but u try it,,u will find simlar question.
On 11/5/07, Robert Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would imagine you have to unserialize
>
> On 11/5/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i find they all return string
> >
> > > $url = '
> >
> http://localhost:8080/solr/s
On Nov 5, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Robert Young wrote:
I would imagine you have to unserialize
On 11/5/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i find they all return string
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?
q=solr&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&wt=php
';
var_dump(file_get_contents(
I would imagine you have to unserialize
On 11/5/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i find they all return string
>
>$url = '
> http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solr&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&wt=php
> ';
> var_dump(file_get_contents($url);
> ?>
>
>
> --
> regards
>
i find they all return string
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solr&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&wt=php
';
var_dump(file_get_contents($url);
?>
--
regards
jl
My question sounds strange I know, but I'll try to explain:
Say I have a custom functionquery MinFloatFunction which takes as its
arguments an array of valuesources.
MinFloatFunction(ValueSource[] sources)
In my case all these valuesources are the values of a collection of fields.
What I need
Thanks, Yonik.
Just curious, does the default operator ( "AND" or "OR") specify the
relationship between a field/value component or between the tokens of the
same field/value componenet?
e.g. for a query like this:
field1:abc field2:xyz
does the operator connect field1:abc and field2:xyz ,
33 matches
Mail list logo
