Re: Multiple Schema File

Hi Sachit, I think what you could do is to create all the "core fields" of your models such as username, role, title, body, images... You can name them with prefix like user.username, user.role, article.title, article.body... If you want to dynamically add more fields to your schema, you can use d

Re: Multiple Schema File

hi , use multi-core Solr. Each core can have its own schema. If possible the DISCLAIMER can be dropped. --Noble On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Sachit P. Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > > > I have a scenario as follows: > > > > I have a CMS where in I'm storing all the contents.

Multiple Schema File

Hi folks, I have a scenario as follows: I have a CMS where in I'm storing all the contents. I need to index all these contents and have a search on these indexes. For indexing, I can define a schema for all the contents. Some of the properties are like title, headline, body, keywords, imag

Re: HttpDataSource common fields

attachment did not work try this http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-How-to-describe-2-entities-in-dataConfig-for-the-DataImporter--p17577610.html --Noble On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > commonField="true" can be added in any field when you are usin

Re: HttpDataSource common fields

commonField="true" can be added in any field when you are using an XPathEntityProcessor.But you will never need to do so because only xml has such a requirement. If you wish to add a string literal use a TemplateTransformer and keep the The one in the patch has a bug use the attached one. http://

Re: POSTing repeated fields to Solr

On 4-Jun-08, at 2:22 PM, Andrew Nagy wrote: Hello - I was wondering if there is a work around with POSTing repeated fields to Solr. I am using Jetty as my container with Solr 1.2. I tried something like: http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=author:(smith)&rows=0&start=0&facet=true&facet.mi

Re: ClassCastException trying to use distributed search

: Hoss:Your are right. It has a version byte written first. This can be : used for any changes that come later..So , when we introduce any Cool .. i just wanted to make sure the issue here was the defualt format changing from XML to binary as part of the development cycle and not an expected "up

Re: new user: some questions about parameters and query syntax

: that for a newbie, there is a certain confusion when it comes to "one : thing with comma a separated list, the other can have multiple : values". This could also be solved perfectly in the wiki (i.e. making : it very clear multiple GET params with the same name can be used, or : if a comma-separ

Re: new user: some questions about parameters and query syntax

: I dunno... for something like "fl", it still seems a bit verbose to : list every field separately. : Some of these things feel like trade offs in ease of readability & : manually typing of URLs vs ease of programmatic manipulation. I don't even think the primary issue is programmatic manipulat

Re: what is null value behavior in function queries?

: I am using function queries to rank the results, : if some/ allthe fields (used in the function ) are missing from the document : what will be the ranking behavior for such documents? Off the top of my head, I believe it's zero, but an easy way to check is to run a simple linear function query

HttpDataSource common fields

Hi, I have a question about the HttpDataSource (DataImportHandler) ... Is it possible add common values *explicitly*, something like: Im blanking on if xpath has a command / option to return back just a string literal (vs. node). Thanks. - Jon

POSTing repeated fields to Solr

Hello - I was wondering if there is a work around with POSTing repeated fields to Solr. I am using Jetty as my container with Solr 1.2. I tried something like: http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=author:(smith)&rows=0&start=0&facet=true&facet.mincount=1&facet.limit=10&facet.field=authorlast&fac

Re: Luke / Lucli w/ Solr index (trunk)

Thanks ... that worked. Much appreciated. - Jon On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:51 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: You will more than likely need to replace the Lucene jars in Luke with the ones used in Solr. We have upgraded Solr's Lucene dependencies in the trunk. I think, this means getting just the

Re: Luke / Lucli w/ Solr index (trunk)

You will more than likely need to replace the Lucene jars in Luke with the ones used in Solr. We have upgraded Solr's Lucene dependencies in the trunk. I think, this means getting just the Luke jar (instead of Luke "all") and then using it with the Lucene lib here. Double check the Luke

Re: Solrj + Multicore

Are you using a recent version of multi-core? Do you have the /update RequestHandler mapped in solrconfig.xml? Since multicore support is new, it does not support the @deprecated / update servlet ryan On Jun 4, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Alexander Ramos Jardim wrote: 2008/6/3 Ryan McKinley

Re: Luke / Lucli w/ Solr index (trunk)

Jon, Lucli is ancient and, as far as I recall, has its own Lucene jar, which you could try replacing. Luke might be better at this point, but even with Luke you may have to use your own Lucene jar (the one you used with Solr+DIH). The error indicates index format incompatibility (likely old j

Re: Luke / Lucli w/ Solr index (trunk)

I got this error when trying to use an index generated by an old version with trunk Solr. 2008/6/4 Jon Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > Just recently upgraded w/ trunk version, Solr works fine but Luke & Lucli > are showing this: > > lucli> index /www/solr/test/index > Lucene CLI. Using direc

Luke / Lucli w/ Solr index (trunk)

Hi, Just recently upgraded w/ trunk version, Solr works fine but Luke & Lucli are showing this: lucli> index /www/solr/test/index Lucene CLI. Using directory '/www/solr/test/index'. Type 'help' for instructions. Error:org.apache.lucene.index.CorruptIndexException: Unknown format version:

Re: How to describe 2 entities in dataConfig for the DataImporter?

Another thing to note, the parentDeltaQuery is of no use if deltaQuery is not specified. In my experience, DataImportHandler is pretty fast and delta queries may not be needed at all if your dataset is small. We use it without delta queries even with millions of solr documents and it completes very

Re: How to describe 2 entities in dataConfig for the DataImporter?

1. Yes you can add virtual columns. Any column/name which does not exist in schema.xml are used for joins but not added to the document. The "column" attribute is the key using which data is read from the entity's Map. The "name" attribute is the solr field to which data is written. Also note that

RE: How to describe 2 entities in dataConfig for the DataImporter?

Thanks Shalin, I'll try this asap. Yes, you did understand the sample schema I've been playing with. Just a couple of questions to clarify for my own understanding your proposal. 1) the column "comboId" doesn't exist on the dB (yet it is specified as a separate "column" for both "owners" and "vets"

Re: Solrj + Multicore

It is mapped correctly. 2008/6/4 Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Jun 4, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Alexander Ramos Jardim wrote: > >> 2008/6/3 Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >>> This way I don't connect: new CommonsHttpSolrServer("http://localhost:8983/solr/idxItem";) >>

Re: How to describe 2 entities in dataConfig for the DataImporter?

Hi Julio, The following are my assumptions after studying your given data-config examples 1. The column id is present in all three tables -- vets, owners and pets. 2. Vets and owners are independent of each other, there is no join required between them 3. There is a parent-child relationship betw

Boost support for MoreLikeThis fields

Hi, SOLR-295 mentions boost support for morelikethis and then seems to have been subsumed by SOLR-281. To be clear, I'm talking about boosts for the mlt.fl fields and how they are ranked rather than

Re: Solrj + Multicore

On Jun 4, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Alexander Ramos Jardim wrote: 2008/6/3 Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: This way I don't connect: new CommonsHttpSolrServer("http://localhost:8983/solr/idxItem";) this is how you need to connect... otherwise nothing will work. When I try this way, I get

Re: 1.3 DisMax and MoreLikeThis

Hi, Thanks Yonik. That fixed that. I would be useful to change one of the existing dismax query types in the default solrconfig.xml to use this new syntax (Especially since DisMaxRequestHandler is being deprecared.) Thanks again...Tom On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PRO

RE: How to describe 2 entities in dataConfig for the DataImporter?

Noble, Thanks for continuing to assist me on trying to come up a config that works. A couple of questions/clarifications: 1) I had to introduce the "artificial" comboID and the transformer because of a conflict with a parallel entity on the "id" ("vets" and "owners"). 2) I don't think there is a co

Re: Ideas on how to implement "sponsored results"

Cuong, I think you will need some manipulation beyond solr queries. You should separate the results by your site criteria after retrieving them. After that, you could cache the results on your application and randomize the lists every time you render the a page. I don't know if solr has collapsin

Re: an error after deleting "index" files

Hi, not sure but this might be same thing that happened to me, you have to delete the index FOLDER not only the contents. On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Nahuel ANGELINETTI < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm doing some test with solr to see if it can be usefull for us, and after > deletin

an error after deleting "index" files

Hi, I'm doing some test with solr to see if it can be usefull for us, and after deleting the index to restart from scratch the indexing, it returns me this error when I want to post datas : java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.FileNotFoundException: no segments* file found in org.apache.luce

Re: 1.3 DisMax and MoreLikeThis

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Tom Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wanted to use the new dismax support for more like this described in > SOLR-295 but can't even get > the new syntax for dismax to work (described in > SOLR-281

1.3 DisMax and MoreLikeThis

Hi, I wanted to use the new dismax support for more like this described in SOLR-295 but can't even get the new syntax for dismax to work (described in SOLR-281). Any ideas if this functionality works

Re: Solrj + Multicore

2008/6/3 Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> >> This way I don't connect: >> new CommonsHttpSolrServer("http://localhost:8983/solr/idxItem";) >> >> > this is how you need to connect... otherwise nothing will work. > When I try this way, I get the following exception, when trying to make an up

Re: Index structuring

Fot 16 mil docs it may not be necessary. Add the shards when you see that perf is degrading. --Noble On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Ritesh Ambastha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The number of docs I have indexed till now is : 1,633,570 > I am bit afraid as the number of indexed docs will grow a

Re: Index structuring

The number of docs I have indexed till now is : 1,633,570 I am bit afraid as the number of indexed docs will grow atleast 5-10 times in very near future. Regards, Ritesh Ambastha Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > > A lot of this also depends on the number of documents. But we have > successful

Re: Index structuring

A lot of this also depends on the number of documents. But we have successfully used Solr with upto 10-12 million documents. On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Ritesh Ambastha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Noble, > > That means, I can go ahead with single Index for long. > :) > > Regards, >

Re: Index structuring

Thanks Noble, That means, I can go ahead with single Index for long. :) Regards, Ritesh Ambastha Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् wrote: > > For the datasize you are proposing , single index should be fine .Just > give the m/c enough RAM > > Distributed search involves multiple requests made betwe

Re: Index structuring

For the datasize you are proposing , single index should be fine .Just give the m/c enough RAM Distributed search involves multiple requests made between shards which may be an unncessary overhead. --Noble On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Ritesh Ambastha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Noble

Re: Index structuring

Thanks Noble, I maintain two separate indexes on my disk for two different search services. The index size of two are: 91MB and 615MB. I am pretty sure that these index size will grow in future, and may reach 10GB. My doubts : 1. When should I start partitioning my index? 2. Is there any perf