I am using SolrJ from trunk and according to
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj you should be able to set the response
parser in the SolrServer interface layer; however, I am unable to do so and
I need the XML response support for querying and adding documents to a Solr
1.2 instance. Also, I have ch
Found it.
I need to remove
${solr.data.dir:./solr/data}
From my solrconfig.xml
Otherwise it keep pointing to C:\WINDOWS\system32\solr
Instead of the folder I specified via solr.solr.home
R,
Erwin
-Original Message-
From: Lau, Erwin
Sent: Friday,13 February 2009 5:45 PM
To: solr-u
Ah I found it.
For some reason my index file is written to
C:\WINDOWS\system32\solr
I have set the solr.solr.home value via the registry.
Is there somewhere else that I need to set to get it written to c:\solr
R,
Erwin
-Original Message-
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar [mailto:shalinma
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Lau, Erwin wrote:
>
> I start my solr jvm through tomcat and I have set registry with the
> following value
>
> Tomcatsolr--parameters--options:
>
> -Dsolr.solr.home=c:\solr
>
> This is my datadir set up on solrconfig.xml
>
> ${solr.data.dir:./solr/data}
>
> And
Hi,
First of all thanks for your reply Otis
I start my solr jvm through tomcat and I have set registry with the
following value
Tomcatsolr--parameters--options:
-Dsolr.solr.home=c:\solr
This is my datadir set up on solrconfig.xml
${solr.data.dir:./solr/data}
And I have check the C:\solr\d
Hi,
data/index is correct, but perhaps you pointed your Solr to some other
directory via solrconfig.xml dataDir setting? Or maybe you didn't specify
solr.solr.home when starting the JVM, so you ended up with a solr directory in
whichever directory you started java from? Hm, do a search (ha!)
Hi All,
Where is the solr indexed stored on the machine?
I have checked SOLR_HOME folder as well as solr tomcat container and it is not
there. When I look at the timestamp of the file located in solr_home\data\index
all the files are quite old.
Is there a way to copy this file across somewh
forEach="/record | /record/mediaBlock" is likely to have problem .
This causes inconsistencies anyway because this is supposed to give
callbacks with same data.
you can definitely write a transformer which gives out multiple rows
if a record contains /record/mediaBlock. the return value of a
tran
: > A roundabout way of asking: how can I fire off *just* a spell check query?
: I don't think it is possible with SpellCheckComponent. But note that only
maybe i'm missing something, but why can't you just say...
spellcheck
...i havne't tried it, but there's no reason i
: which shows that the 5.0 boost in dateCreatedYear:2009^5.0 is being
: applied however, the 2.0 boost is missing in "(bodytext:iphone OR
: bodytext:firmware)^2.0" How is the 2.0 boost being applied to the
: score?
if i remember correctly, in boolean queries the boost is pushed down
to the cla
: It still seems to get confused by & characters and turning them into %26
: does not work from the solr-ruby connection. ..but it works for most of the
: DOI's that I have tried so still a big improvement - thanks.
my suggestion would be to start by testing your queries in a browser so
you can
I believe the reason is b/c when onlyMP is false, if the word itself
is already in the index, it short circuits out. When onlyMP is true,
it checks to see if there are more frequently occurring variations.
However, I don't have the code in front of me at the moment, so I
can't verify.
-G
I'm on version 1.3.0
My schema has the float and sfloat types defined, but doesn't have any float
fields at all. I've rolled through my list of fields with required="true"
and verified that none of them are empty. Additionally, there are no empty
values being passed in the doc wrapper.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Joshua Kaiser wrote:
> I'm having issues debugging an error on the Solr server when I attempt to
> add a document. My feeling is that it's ultimately an issue with my
> document not obeying my schema definition, but I have no clue how to track
> down the offendi
Hi,
I'm very new to Solr. I've tried searching archives for this error, but
haven't found it. If this is something that may be found in a faq or
existing forum, please feel free to point me there.
I'm having issues debugging an error on the Solr server when I attempt to
add a document. My feel
Thanks, I'm inclined not to even bother with stopwords as in my case I've got
a fairly small dataset and leaving them in doesn't seem to have a noticeable
effect on performance.
On Thursday 12 February 2009 15:41:05 Jeff Newburn wrote:
> Unfortunately, the stopword filter acts funny (depending o
Batch committing is always a better option than committing for each
document. An optimize automatically commits. Note that you may not need to
optimize very frequently. For a lot cases, optimizing once per day works
fine.
Yes but commit once per day won"t show updated datas until the next day, I
Hi,
Do you have an idea where it could come from ??
the process seems to stay stuck ???
2009/02/12 16:35:01 started by root
2009/02/12 16:35:01 command: /data/solr/book/bin/commit
2009/02/12 16:35:02 ended (elapsed time: 1 sec)
2009/02/12 16:40:01 started by root
2009/02/12 16:40:01 command: /
Unfortunately, the stopword filter acts funny (depending on who you ask) in
dismax. The short version is that the stopwords filter has to be on all
fields being queried on for minimum matches to work. We have the same issue
with one of our brands. We require all word matching so "The North Face"
Hi Grant,
Thanks for your quick answer.
So there is not a real quick way to increase one field in particular
according to another one if the text is find there, otherwise how can I do
that in two queries ?
thanks a lot,
Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote:
>
> Hi Sunny,
>
> As with any relevance issue
Hi Sunny,
As with any relevance issue, one of the first thing I ask before
getting to a solution, is what is the problem you are seeing that
makes you want to change the way things work?
That being said, the only way you would be able to do this is through
some custom components and I'm p
Hi Grant,
thanks for your help.
I have just one more question:
BTW, one workaround is to simply create an index from your file and then
use the IndexBasedSpellChecker. Each line equals one document. You
could even assign weights that way.
In the solrconfig.xml there is a line
field
Can I u
Hello,
I am having bother with forEach. I have XML source documents containing
many embedded images within mediaBlock elements. Each image has a an
associated caption. I want to implement a separate image search function
which searches the captions and brings back the associated image.
Is
Hello,
I have another question concerning the spell checking mechanism.
Setting onlyMorePopular=true and using the parameters
spellcheck=true&spellcheck.q=gran&q=gran&spellcheck.onlyMorePopular=true
I get the result
1
0
4
13
32
grand
true
which is oka
Hi Noble, the Solr instance is not exactly at example.solrstuff.org. I don't
want to write here the exact url, it might get picked up by a bot...
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <
noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> this link is not working example.solrstuff.org. who is main
Yes, I'm aware of SolrSharp. I exposed my reasons to build another client in
my blog (http://bugsquash.blogspot.com/2007/11/introducing-solrnet.html),
it's a different approach. This is not something that I'm starting now -
I've already used my client in production for over a year.
I see on the fro
Hi everybody,
Wish you a nice day,
I've a question, I would like to know if it's possible to boost differently
some field according to where it find the word.
Will try to make it more clear;
I've a book core with title, description and tags.
If word looked for is found in the title, I would li
Hi everybody,
Wish you a nice day,
I've a question, I would like to know if it's possible to boost differently
some field according to where it find the word.
Will try to make it more clear;
I've a book core with title, description and tags.
If word looked for is found in the title, I would li
Hi
Yes I saw that afterward so I decrease it from 5000 to 4500
Sunny
Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote:
>
> It looks like you are running out of memory. What is your heap size?
>
> On Feb 11, 2009, at 4:09 AM, sunnyfr wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Have you an idea why after a night with solr running, b
29 matches
Mail list logo
