Hello everyone,
I want to add turkish character support solr. For example when i make a
query with letter 'c' i want to to get result having 'c' and Turkish
character 'ç' and vice versa. How can i do that. Do you have any opinion.
Thanks,
Can
I want to add turkish character support solr. For example
when i make a
query with letter 'c' i want to to get result having 'c'
and Turkish
character 'ç' and vice versa. How can i do that. Do you
have any opinion.
You can replace Turkish characters (ç) with their ascii versions (c) with a
Hi Noble,
Thanks for the response.
CAPS is not the issue.
Can you please confirm the link below is the code for the SQLEntityProcessor
in the release 1.4?
is in solr 1.4 maby a way to search with an wildcard at the beginning?
in 1.3 i cant activate it.
KingArtus
Thanks Alexey, this is working.
I've split it into query and boostQuery using dismax and it gives some
appropriate results.
Cheers,
Chantal
Alexey Serba schrieb:
Or maybe it's
possible to tweak MoreLikeThis just to return the fields and terms that
could be used for a search on the other
Hi Yonik,
this works fine for me! However, I'm using Java/SolrJ and I have the
freedom to add any necessary jars to convert the value.
But how about clients that cannot make use of FieldType? They cannot use
those custom values and will be stuck at that point, isn't it?
Shall I still open
Noble Paul wrote:
Yes , open an issue . This is a trivial change
I've opened JIRA issue SOLR-1554.
-Sascha
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Sascha Szott sz...@zib.de wrote:
Noble,
Noble Paul wrote:
DIH imports are really long running. There is a good chance that the
connection times out
Hi Experts,
I would like help on multi word synonyms. The scenario is like:
I have a name Micheal Jackson(wrong term) which has a synonym Michael Jackson
i.e.
Micheal Jackson = Michael Jackson
When I try to search for the word Micheal Jackson (not a phrase search), it is
searching for
Hi,
I am using solr 1.3 and i hv inserted some data in my comment
field.
for example:
for document1:
str name=comment
The iPhone 3GS finally adds common cell phone features like multimedia
messaging, video recording, and voice dialing. It runs faster; its promised
battery life is longer;
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Chantal Ackermann
chantal.ackerm...@btelligent.de wrote:
this works fine for me! However, I'm using Java/SolrJ and I have the freedom
to add any necessary jars to convert the value.
These conversions should normally be done on the Solr server side
(i.e.
Hi Avlesh,
Avlesh Singh wrote:
1. Is it considered as good practice to set up several DIH request
handlers, one for each possible parameter value?
Nothing wrong with this. My assumption is that you want to do this to
speed
up indexing. Each DIH instance would block all others, once a
I'm not sure if this is what you mean, but we do all our indexing on a
non-public server so we can test it. Only when everyone is satisfied do
we put it on the public server.
To do that we just tar up the index folder and scp it to the server.
To install it, we stop solr, untar it, and start
-- Forwarded message --
From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् noble.p...@corp.aol.com
Date: 2009/11/12
Subject: Re: ${dataimporter.delta.twitter_id} not getting populated in
deltaImportQuery
To: Mark Ellul m...@catalystic.com
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Mark Ellul
On Nov 12, 2009, at 8:55 AM, Rakhi Khatwani wrote:
Hi,
I am using solr 1.3 and i hv inserted some data in my comment
field.
for example:
for document1:
str name=comment
The iPhone 3GS finally adds common cell phone features like multimedia
messaging, video recording, and voice
It's one of my pending issues for SolrNet (
http://code.google.com/p/solrnet/issues/detail?id=71 )
I've looked at the code, it doesn't seem terribly complex to port to C#. It
would be kind of cumbersome to test it though.
I just didn't implement it yet because I'm getting good enough performance
Has anyone looked into using the javabin response format from .NET
(instead of SolrJ)?
It's mainly a curiosity.
How much better could performance/bandwidth/throughput be? How
difficult would it be to implement some .NET code (C#, I'd guess being
the best choice) to handle this response
I was thinking of going this route too because I've found that parsing XML
result sets using XmlDocument + XPath can be very slow (up to a few seconds)
when requesting ~100 documents. Are you getting good performance parsing
large result sets? Are you using SAX instead of DOM?
Thanks,
Wojtek
I've got a process external to Solr that is constantly feeding it new
documents, retrying if Solr is nonresponding. What's the right way to
stop Solr (running in Tomcat) so no documents are lost?
Currently I'm committing all cores and then running catalina's stop
script, but between my commit
I use DOM. Honestly, I haven't run any perf tests, it all just runs well
enough for me. Then again, my documents and resultsets are typically small
(~1KB docs and ~50 docs per resultset). How big are your documents?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:40 PM, wojtekpia wojte...@hotmail.com wrote:
I was
It is recommended [1] to use synonyms at index time only for various reasons
especially with multi-word synonyms.
[1]http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.SynonymFilterFactory
only at index time use expand=true ingoreCase=true with synonym.txt :
micheal, michael
OR:
I simply altered solr.xml and changed it to persistent=true, then
all subsequent actions were saved.
Thanks
2009/11/11 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् noble.p...@corp.aol.com:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like our core admin wiki
DOM is the wrong choice for unmarshalling XML data from a protocol. The DOM is
slow and bloated. You need that if you are manipulating an XML document, but
not if you are stripmining the data from it then throwing the document away.
Try a StAX parser: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StAX
That
Like I said before, it has served me and other people very well so far.
AFAIK there is no StAX implementation for .Net, there is XmlReader but it's
quite more complex to use than XmlDocument (DOM).
Of course, I always welcome patches.
Cheers,
Mauricio
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Walter
Hi,
I have succeeded running and querying with *PayloadTermQueryPlugin, *
*When I ran my test against an embedded solrj server it ran fine, Im using
maven solr 1.4 artifacts.*
*When I deployed it into my servlet container the plugin didn't load, the
war in the servlet container came from a
: ex: A + W Root Beer
: the field uses a keyword tokenizer to keep the string together, then
: it will get converted to aw root beer by a custom filter ive made, i
: now want to split that up into 3 tokens (aw, root, beer), but seems
TokenFilter's can produce more tokens then they consume ... so
: Here's how we did it in Lucene: we had an extension of Query, with a custom
: scorer. In the index we stored the category id's as single-valued
: space-separated string. We also stored a space-separated string of scores
: in another field. We made of these fields stored. We simply
: I want to disable coord for certain queries. For example, if I pass a URL
: parameter like disableCoord to Solr, the BooleanQuery generated will have
: coord disabled. If it's not currently supported, what would be a good way
: to implement it?
in order to have something like this on a per
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
oh man, so you were parsing the Stored field values of every matching doc
at query time? ouch.
Assuming i'm understanding your goal, the conventional way to solve this
type of problem is payloads ... you'll find
: I can contribute a patch for this.
: Attached is the patch I would like to have in Solrj.
: If there is any problem with it please let me know. I followed the
: HowToContribute wiki page and I hope that I didn't miss any steps.
the mailing list typically rejects attachments. As mentioned on
: I am getting results from one query and I just need 2 index attribute values
: . These index attribute values are used for form new Query to Solr.
can you elaborate on what exactly you mean by These index attribute
values are used for form new Query to Solr ... are you saying that you
want
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: I am getting results from one query and I just need 2 index attribute
values
: . These index attribute values are used for form new Query to Solr.
can you elaborate on what exactly you mean by These index
Scenario:
1. I have a query I want to execute; I would be using the results and facets
returned
2. I also have a couple of dozen other queries that are closely related to
the first query and to the facets returned by that query. For each query, I
would only be using the total number of results
Checked out the 1.4.0 release from the tag but when I build I get
1.4.1-dev appended to the build artifacts.
Thank you,
Nasseam
http://bodukai.com
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: I can contribute a patch for this.
: Attached is the patch I would like to have in Solrj.
: If there is any problem with it please let me know. I followed the
: HowToContribute wiki page and I hope that I
May be simpler to just download it. The -dev bit was just mentioned on the
list, so check the ML archives.
Otis
--
Sematext is hiring -- http://sematext.com/about/jobs.html?mls
Lucene, Solr, Nutch, Katta, Hadoop, HBase, UIMA, NLP, NER, IR
- Original Message
From: Nasseam Elkarra
Could you use the facet.query feature
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.query_:_Arbitrary_Query_Faceting)
to reduce it to 2 queries?
So you'd:
1. Send solr the first query
2. Solr executes and returns the query to you
3. You then use the facet results to create a 2nd
tpunder wrote:
Could you use the facet.query feature
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.query_:_Arbitrary_Query_Faceting)
to reduce it to 2 queries?
So you'd:
1. Send solr the first query
2. Solr executes and returns the query to you
3. You then use the facet
Hi, everyone, this is a problem I've had for quite a while,
and have basically avoided optimizing because of it. However,
eventually we will get to the point where we must delete as
well as add docs continuously.
I have a Solr 1.3 index with ~4M docs at around 90G. This is a single
instance
When using Solr 1.4 in multicore configuration:
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
cores adminPath=/admin/cores sharedSchema=false
core name=core0 instanceDir=/opt/multicore
dataDir=/opt/core0 schemaName=schema-core0.xml /
core name=core1
Turner, Robbin J wrote:
When using Solr 1.4 in multicore configuration:
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
cores adminPath=/admin/cores sharedSchema=false
core name=core0 instanceDir=/opt/multicore
dataDir=/opt/core0 schemaName=schema-core0.xml /
On the CoreAdmin wiki page. thanks
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:11 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Multicore solr.xml schemaName parameter not being recognized
Turner, Robbin J wrote:
When
Jerome L Quinn wrote:
Hi, everyone, this is a problem I've had for quite a while,
and have basically avoided optimizing because of it. However,
eventually we will get to the point where we must delete as
well as add docs continuously.
I have a Solr 1.3 index with ~4M docs at around 90G.
Unfortunately no. the +20 queries are distinct from each other, even tho
they share some of the original query parameters (and some facet
information
from the original query facets).
what I was envisioning was something that works like a facet, but instead
of
returning information about
Not posting a problem or a solution. Just wanted to get word back to
the Solr developers, bug testers, and mailing list gurus how much I love
Solr 1.4. Our site search is more accurate, the search box offers
better suggestions must faster than before, and the elevate
functionality has
: Use SolrJ and embed solr in my webapp, but I want to disable the http access
: to solr, meaning force all calls through my solrj interface I am building (no
: admin access etc).
if you're app is running in a servlet container anyway, you might find it
just as easy to install solr into the
Hi,
I'm seeing this stack trace when I try to view a specific document, e.g.
/admin/luke?id=1 but luke appears to be working correctly when I just view
/admin/luke. Does this look familiar to anyone? Our sysadmin just upgraded us
to the 1.4 release, I'm not sure if this occurred before that.
Hi,
Sorry i forgot to mention that comment field is a text field.
Regards,
Raakhi
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
On Nov 12, 2009, at 8:55 AM, Rakhi Khatwani wrote:
Hi,
I am using solr 1.3 and i hv inserted some data in my comment
Is there any tool to directly port java to .Net? then we can etxract
out the client part of the javabin code and convert it.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone looked into using the javabin response format from .NET (instead
of SolrJ)?
It's
I guess SOLR-1352 should solve all the problems with performance. I am
working on one currently and I hope to submit a patch soon.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Sascha Szott sz...@zib.de wrote:
Hi Avlesh,
Avlesh Singh wrote:
1. Is it considered as good practice to set up several DIH
I played around with it and am also getting a NullPointerException on Solr
1.4, as well (albeit with a slightly different dump). Some of my documents
actually return, FYI, just not all. I'm on a on a multi-solr-core system
searching /solr/core1/admin/luke?id=MYID. My Exception looked different,
Hi,
I would like to know if there is a way to add type converters when using
getBeans. I need convertion when Updating (Calendar - String) and when
Searching (String - Calendar)
The Bean class defines :
@Field
private Calendar validFrom;
but the recieved type within Query Response is a String
create a setter method for the field which take s a Stringand apply
the annotation there
example
private Calendar validFrom;
@Field
public void setvalidFrom(String s){
//convert to Calendar object and set the field
}
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:24 PM, paulhyo st...@ouestil.ch wrote:
Hi,
52 matches
Mail list logo
