Where is your query?
You don't search for anything.
The q-param is empty.
You got two options (untested): remove the q-param or search for something
special.
I think removing is not a good idea. Instead search for *:* would retrive
ALL results that match your filter-query.
Kind regards
-
Hey,
I'm using solr 1.4 I've a master / slave setup, I use the slave for all my
read operations commits are scheduled every 20 mins or every 1 docs. Now
I think slave shouldn't build index but fetch ones created on Master, but I see
it creating indexes, during which all read stalls.
Hi folks,
is it possible to sort by field length without having to (redundantly)
save the length information in a seperate index field? At first, I
thought to accomplish this using a function query, but I couldn't find
an appropriate one.
Thanks in advance,
Sascha
So my need is this:
I have a site in which a user does a query for other users. The user can filter
the query by different parameters that will limit the result set. One of the
things about the system is that the user's can like different objects
(Products, Services, etc.). When the user
I should add that talks on Mahout, Tika, Nutch, etc. are also encouraged.
-Grant
On May 17, 2010, at 8:43 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Lucene Revolution Call For Participation - Boston, Massachusetts October 7
8, 2010
The first US conference dedicated to Apache Lucene and Solr is coming
So you're right i did miss removing the app deployment but removing that
still didn't really do that great. The avg request response time is still
slower. The bell curve is a lot more streched than it was before but it
doesn't seem to give an overall better performance.
Thanks for your
Hello,
How am I able to highlight a field that contains a specific value? If I have a
field called type, how am I able to highlight the rows whose values contain
something like title?
I'm running edismax (on both a 1.4 with patch and a branch_3x version) and
I'm seeing something I don't expect.
We have our mm set such that 2/2 must match and 2/3 must match (mm=2-1
567%
A query of
dog cat
...gets interpreted as
dog AND cat
But a query of
dog cat -mouse
...gets
I am not sure, what you mean with multi-user-scenario.
I have an application deployed on an application server (Weblogic). This
application uses solr to query an index. Users (sessions) will log in to the
application, query and then log out. This login and logout has nothing to do
with solr but
Hi
I am using dismax request handler, I wanted to highlight the search
field,
So added
str name=hltrue/str
I was expecting like if I search for keyword Akon resultant docs
wherever the Akon is available is bold.
But I am not seeing them getting bold, could some one tell me the real
Check that the field you are highlighting on is stored. It won't work
otherwise.
Now, this also means that the field is returned from the query. For large
text fields to be highlighted only, this means the entire text is returned
for each result.
There is a pending feature to address this, that
Are there any of these conferences in India?
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Mon, 5/24/10, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
From: Grant
Hey Daren,
Yes the fields for which I am searching are stored and indexed, also
they are returned from the query,
Also it is not coming, if the entire search keyword is part of the
field.
Thanks
Prakash
-Original Message-
From: dar...@ontrenet.com [mailto:dar...@ontrenet.com]
Sent:
Hi,
I have a requirement to dynamically choose a fieldType to analyze text in
multiple languages. I will know the language (in a separate field) at index
and query time.
I've tried implementing this with a custom UpdateRequestProcessorFactory and
custom DocumentBuilder.toDocument to change the
I have Windows 7 x64. The entire issue is the non-existence of solr/logs
folder.
Even when I run commands in Administrator mode the folder doesn't get
created automagically.
After I manually created it,
ant index (21 minutes) and
java -Xms512M -Xmx1024M -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
Hi Prakash,
more importantly, check the field type and its associated analyzer. In
case you use a non-tokenized type (e.g., string), highlighting will
not appear if only a partial field match exists (only exact matches,
i.e. the query coincides with the field value, will be highlighted). If
Thanks Sascha,
The type for fields for which I am searching are all text , and I am
using solr.TextField
fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
!-- in this example, we will only
Hi Prakash,
can you provide
1. the definition of the relevant field
2. your query
3. the definition of the relevant request handler
4. a field value that is stored in your index and should be highlighted
-Sascha
Doddamani, Prakash wrote:
Thanks Sascha,
The type for fields for which I am
Ahh, now I understand.
No, you need no second IndexSearcher as long as the Server is alive.
You can reuse your searcher for every user.
The only commands you are executing per user are those to create a
search-query.
Kind regards,
- Mitch
--
View this message in context:
I apply a faceted search and get document ids from the facet_field I have
used.
Then I search for these documents given ids. id:(id1 id2 ...)
But the order is not predictable. (It applies OR)
I do not want to sort documents again.
Is there any way to get documents in the given id order?
--
Thank you I found the API to get the existing SolrIndexSearcher to be
present in SolrCore:
SolrCore.getSearcher().get()
So if now the Index changes (a commit is done) in between, will I
automatically get the new SolrIndexSearcher from this call ?
Regards
Rahul
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:25
Good question.
Well, I never worked productively with SolrJ.
But two things:
The first: As the documentation says, you *should* get your IndexSearcher
from your SolrQueryRequest-object.
The second: As a developer of the SolrJ I would do as much as I can
automatically behind the curtain. That
It's not true that highlighting means you have to return the field
from the query too. You can specify fl independently of hl.fl
Erik
On May 24, 2010, at 12:02 PM, dar...@ontrenet.com wrote:
Check that the field you are highlighting on is stored. It won't
work
otherwise.
Now,
A. Good to know. Thanks!
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 16:34 -0400, Erik Hatcher wrote:
It's not true that highlighting means you have to return the field
from the query too. You can specify fl independently of hl.fl
Erik
On May 24, 2010, at 12:02 PM, dar...@ontrenet.com wrote:
I'm trying to perform a faceted search without any luck. Result set
doesn't return any facet information...
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=title:*facet=onfacet.field=title
I'm getting the result set, but no face information present? Is there
something else that needs to happen to turn
Hi Ilya,
Ilya Sterin wrote:
I'm trying to perform a faceted search without any luck. Result set
doesn't return any facet information...
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=title:*facet=onfacet.field=title
I'm getting the result set, but no face information present? Is there
something else
it's probably because your query isn't matching anything. try q=title:
[* TO *], or maybe even simply *:* if you are trying to match all
documents.
Erik
On May 24, 2010, at 5:11 PM, Ilya Sterin wrote:
I'm trying to perform a faceted search without any luck. Result set
doesn't
: -Should I be warming the new searcher with a search which uninverts all of
: my fields?
yes.
: -If so, will the warming happen before the new searcher is registered?
they will if you do them as part of a newSearcher event in your
solrconfig.xml -- the example solrocnfig.xml has some
: Special characters in the text used for boost queries are not removed. For
: example, bq=field1:(what is xyz?)^10 gets parsed into query field1:xyz?10
: (what and is are stop words). Question mark didn't get removed -- field1
: uses standard tokenizer and standard filter, so I expect it to get
: so i edit the solrconfig.xml in tht file to add clustering information (i
: did make sure that the lib declaration points to the correct location).
are you sure? ... did you see log messages (prior to the stack trace
below) inidcating that the clustering jar was being loaded?
: Thank you I found the API to get the existing SolrIndexSearcher to be
: present in SolrCore:
: SolrCore.getSearcher().get()
I think perhaps you need to take 5 big steps back and explain what your
goal is. 99.999% of all solr users should never care about that method --
even the 99.9% of
Are you sure you want to recompute the length when sorting?
It's the classic time/space tradeoff, but I'd suggest that when
your index is big enough to make taking up some more space
a problem, it's far too big to spend the cycles calculating each
term length for sorting purposes considering you
32 matches
Mail list logo
