Hi,
I have a requirement where I want to sum up the scores of the faceted
fields. This will be decide the relevancy for us. Is there a way to do it on
a facet field? Basically instead of giving the count of records for facet
field I would like to have total sum of scores for those records.
Any
Hi All,
I am very new and learning solr.
I have 10 column like following in table
1. id
2. name
3. user_id
4. location
5. country
6. landmark1
7. landmark2
8. landmark3
9. landmark4
10. landmark5
when user search for landmark then I want to return only one landmark which
match. Rest of the
Well you are correct Erik that this is a database-ish thing try to achieve
in solr and unfortunately the sin :) had been committed by somebody else :)
and now we are running into relevancy issues.
Let me try to state the problem more casually.
1. There are user records of type A, B, C etc.
Hi,
I think the starting point should be :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors
For example you could start playing with the mergeFactor parameter.
My 2 cents,
Tommaso
2010/7/27 Chengyang atreey...@163.com
How to reduce the index files size, decreate the sync time between each
I attached a patch for Solr 1.4.1 release on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1902 that made things work for
me.
This strange behaviour for me was due to the fact that I copied the patched
jars and war inside the dist directory but forgot to update the war inside
the example/webapps
Does anybody know if this feature works correctly?
Or I'm doing something wrong?
2010/7/27 Pavel Minchenkov char...@gmail.com
Hi,
I'm trying to sort by distance like this:
sort=dist(2,lat,lon,55.755786,37.617633) asc
In general results are sorted, but some documents are not in right
Nobody out there who can help me with this problem?
I need to edit the result of the javabin writer (adding the results from
the webservice).
I hope it is possible to do that.
thanks in advance.
Am Mo 26.07.2010 10:25 schrieb Jörg Wißmeier :
Hi everybody,
since a while i'm working with solr
Hi all,
I am running a Solr 1.4 instance on FreeBSD that generates large log files in
very short periods. I used /etc/newsyslog to configure log file rotation,
however once the log file is rotated then Solr doesn't write logs to the new
file. I'm wondering if there is a way to let Solr know
Hi Mark,
Thanks for that info looks very interesting, would be great to see your
code. Out of interest did you use the dictionary and the phonetic file? Did
you see better results with both?
In regards to the secondary part to check the corpus for matching
suggestions, would another way to do
make sure to set stored=true on every field you expect to be returned
in your results for later display.
Chantal
Hi Lance!
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 02:31 +0200, Lance Norskog wrote:
Should this go into the trunk, or does it only solve problems unique
to your use case?
The solution is generic but is an extension of XPathEntityProcessor
because I didn't want to touch the solr.war. This way I can deploy the
Hi,
Solr seems to be crashing after a JVM exception that new threads cannot be
created. I am writing in hope of advice from someone that has experienced this
before. The exception that is causing the problem is:
Exception in thread btpool0-5 java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create
new
try to delete solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory from your analyzerchain. i
had similar problems by using german SnowballPorterFilterFactory
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Strange-search-tp998961p1001990.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
Hello community,
I need to transform SolrJ - responses into JSON, after some computing on
those results by another application has finished.
I can not do those computations on the Solr - side.
So, I really have to translate SolrJ's output into JSON.
Any experiences how to do so without
Hi,
In my schema I have (inter ali) fields CollectionID, and CollectionName.
These two values always match together, which means that for every value of
CollectionID there is matching value from CollectionName.
I am interested in query which allow me to get unique values of CollectionID
with
Hi,
I'm observing some strange highlighted words in field value snippets
returned from Solr when matched term highlighting
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters) is enabled.
In some cases, highlighted field value snippets contain highlighted
words that are not matches:
-
The patch should also work with trunk, but I haven't verified it yet.
I've just added a patch against solr trunk to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1804.
S.
I want to show elevated Result Different from others is there any way to do
this
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Show-elevated-Result-Differently-tp1002081p1002081.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I think you should just be able to add wt=json to the end of your
query (or change whatever the existing wt parameter is in your URL).
Mark
On 28 Jul 2010, at 12:54 pm, MitchK wrote:
Hello community,
I need to transform SolrJ - responses into JSON, after some
computing on
those results
Hello ,
Second try to send a mail to the mailing list...
I need to translate SolrJ's response into JSON-response.
I can not query Solr directly, because I need to do some math with the
responsed data, before I show the results to the client.
Any experiences how to translate SolrJ's response
On 28 Jul 2010, at 2:08 pm, MitchK wrote:
Second try to send a mail to the mailing list...
Your first attempt got through as well. Here's my original response.
I think you should just be able to add wt=json to the end of your
query (or change whatever the existing wt parameter is in your
Hi,
I got a response to your e-mail in my box 30 minutes ago. Anyway, enable the
JSONResponseWriter, if you haven't already, and query with wt=json. Can't get
mucht easier.
Cheers,
On Wednesday 28 July 2010 15:08:26 MitchK wrote:
Hello ,
Second try to send a mail to the mailing list...
Thank you Markus, Mark.
Seems to be a problem with Nabble, not with the mailing list. Sorry.
I can create a JSON-response, when I query Solr directly.
But I mean, that I query Solr through a SolrJ-client
(CommonsHttpSolrServer).
That means my queries look a litte bit like that:
Yesterday I did get this working with version 4.0 from trunk. I haven't fully
tested it yet, but the content doesn't come through blank anymore, so that's
good. Would it be more stable to stick with 1.4.1 and your patch to get to
Tika 0.8, or to stick with the 4.0 trunk version?
Best,
Dave
In my opinion, the 1.4.1 version with the Patch is more Stable.
Until 4.0 will be released
2010/7/28 David Thibault dthiba...@esperion.com
Yesterday I did get this working with version 4.0 from trunk. I haven't
fully tested it yet, but the content doesn't come through blank anymore, so
You could use org.apache.solr.handler.JsonLoader.
That one uses org.apache.noggit.JSONParser internally.
I've used the JacksonParser with Spring.
http://json.org/ lists parsers for different programming languages.
Cheers,
Chantal
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 15:08 +0200, MitchK wrote:
Hello ,
If you don't store the content then you can't do highlighting, right? Also,
don't you just have to switch the text field to say stored=true in your
schema to store the text? I don't understand why you're differentiating the
behavior of ExtractingRequestHandler from the behavior of Solr in
Thanks, I'll try that then. I kind of figured that'd be the answer, but after
fighting with Solr ExtractingRequestHandler for 2 days I also just wanted to
be done with it once it started working with 4.0...=) However, stability would
be better in the long run.
Best,
Dave
-Original
you can index each of these field separately...
field1- Id
field2- name
field3-user_id
field4-country.
field7- landmark
While quering you can specify q=Landmark9 This will return you results..
And if you want only particular fields in output.. use the fl parameter in
query...
like
This was my same feeling :-) and so I went for the trunk to have things
working quickly, but I also have to consider which one is the best version
since I am going to deploy it in the near future in an enterprise
environment and choosing the best version is an importat step.
I am quite new to Solr
Hi,
I'm new to Solr and have a rather dumb question. I want to do a query
that returns all the Titles that start with a certain letter. For
example
I have these titles:
Results of in-mine research in support
Cancer Reports
State injury indicators report
Cancer Reports
Indexed dermal
Thank you, Chantal.
I have looked at this one: http://www.json.org/java/index.html
This seems to be an easy-to-understand-implementation.
However, I am wondering how to determine whether a SolrDocument's field
is multiValued or not.
The JSONResponseWriter of Solr looks at the
I am new for solr. Just got example xml file index and search by following solr
tutorial. I wonder how I can get the search result display in a JSP. I really
appreciate any suggestions you can give.
Thanks so much,
Xiaohui
Hi Mitch
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 16:38 +0200, MitchK wrote:
Thank you, Chantal.
I have looked at this one: http://www.json.org/java/index.html
This seems to be an easy-to-understand-implementation.
However, I am wondering how to determine whether a SolrDocument's field
is multiValued or
Hi
thanks for reply..
Actually requirement is diffrent (sorry if I am unable to clerify in first
mail).
basically follwoing are the fields name in schema as well:
1. id
2. name
3. user_id
4. location
5. country
6. landmark1
7. landmark2
8. landmark3
9. landmark4
10. landmark5
which
Hi,
very simple to display value in jsp. if you are using solrj then simply
store value in bean from java class and can display.
same thing you can do in servlet too.. get the solr server response and
return in bean or can display directly(in servlet).
hope you will able to do.
regards
I think you using wild-card search or should use wild-card search. but
first of all please provide the schema and configuration file for more
details.
regards
Ranveer
On Wednesday 28 July 2010 07:51 PM, Nguyen, Vincent (CDC/OSELS/NCPHI)
(CTR) wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to Solr and have a rather
Thanks - but my schema.xml is not recognizing field names specified in the
data-config.xml.
For example - and I just tested this now - if I have in my data-config.xml:
field column=product_id name=pid /
And then in my schema.xml:
field name=pid type=int indexed=true stored=true required=true
I therefore wrote an implementation of SolrSpellChecker that wraps jazzy,
the java aspell library. I also extended the SpellCheckComponent to take
the
matrix of suggested words and query the corpus to find the first
combination
of suggestions which returned a match. This works well for my use
As far as I know all searches get cache at least for some time. I am
not sure about field collapse results being cached.
- Moazzam
http://moazzam-khan.com
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Li Li fancye...@gmail.com wrote:
I want a cache to cache all result of a query(all steps including
Hi Chantal,
thank you for the feedback.
I did not see the wood for the trees!
The SolrDocument's javadoc says the following:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/common/SolrDocument.html
|*getFieldValue
I think I got it to work. If I do a wildcard search using the dc3.title
field it seems to work fine (dc3.title:c*). The dc.title:c* returns
every title that has a word in it that starts with 'c', which isn't
exactly what I wanted. I'm guessing it's because of the
type=caseInsensitiveSort.
Hi guys,
I read somewhere that Solr 1.4.1 has field collapse support by default
(without patching it) but I haven't been able to confirm it. Is this
true?
- Moazzam
Well I do have disk limitations too, and thats why I think slave nodes died,
when replicating data from master node. (as it was just adding on top of
existing index files).
:: What do you mean here? Optimizing is too CPU expensive?
What I meant by avoid playing around with slave nodes is that
In solrconfig.xml, these two lines control that. Maybe they need to be
increased.
str name=httpConnTimeout5000/str
str name=httpReadTimeout1/str
Where do I add those in solrconfig? These lines doesn't seem to be present
in the example solrconfig file...
--
View this message in
I wonder how do NOT queries work. Is it a pass on the result set and
filtering out the NOT property or something like that?
Also is there anybody who does some performance checks on NOT queries? I
want to know whether there is a significant performance degradation or not
when you have NOT in a
Thanks so much for your reply. I don't have much experience at JSP. I found tag
library, and am trying to use xsltlib:apply xml=%=
url.getContent().toString() % xsl=/xsl/result.xsl/ . Unfortunately I
didn't get it work.
Would you please give me more information? I really appreciate your
Tom,
The total number of terms... Ah well, not a big deal, however yes the
flex branch does expose this so we can show this in Solr at some
point, hopefully outside of Solr's Luke impl.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Burton-West, Tom tburt...@umich.edu wrote:
Hi Jason,
Are you looking for
Tommasso,
I used your patch and tried it with the 1.4.1 solr.war from a fresh 1.4.1
distribution, and it still gave me that NoSuchMethodError. However, when I
tried it with the newly-patched-and-compiled apache-solr-1.4.2-dev.war file it
works. I think I tried that before and it didn't work.
At first I was thinking the TermsComponent might give you this, but
oddly it seems not to.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent
ManBearPig is still a threat.
-Kallin Nagelberg
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 7:44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to 'filter' facet results
Is there a way to tell Solr to only return a specific
Hi All,
Whenever I use field collapse, the numFound attribute contains
exactly as many rows as I put in rows parameter instead of returning
total number of documents that matched the query. Is there a way to
rectify this?
Thanks,
Moazzam
Hi,
It didn't seem like it improved the situation. The same exception stack
traces are found.
I have explicitly defined the index readers to be reopened by specifying in
the solrconfig.xml
The exception occurs when the remote cores are being searched. I am
attaching the exceptions in a text
: I'm trying to use dspace to search across a range of index created and stored
: using Dsindexer.java class. I have seen where Solr can be use to perform
I've never headr of Dsindexer.java but since this is hte first result
google returns...
I would like to be search against my index, and then *know* which of a set
of given terms were found in each document.
For example, let's say I want to show articles with the word pizza or
cake in them, but would like to be able to say which of those two was
found. I might use this to handle the
Please expand on what this means, it's quite vague. You might review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Vishal.Arora vis...@value-one.com wrote:
I want to show elevated Result Different from others is there any way to do
this
--
View
What is the query you submit (don't forget debugQuery=on? In particular,
what
field are you sorting on?
But yes, if you're searching on a tokenized field, you'll get matches on all
tokens
in that field. Which are probably single words. And no matter how you sort,
you're
still getting documents
1,500 threads seems extreme by any standards so there is something
happening in your install. Even with appservers for web apps,
typically 100 would be a fair # of threads.
On 7/28/10, Christos Constantinou ch...@simpleweb.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
Solr seems to be crashing after a JVM exception that
Your commits are very suspect. How often are you making changes to your
index?
Do you have autocommit on? Do you commit when updating each document?
Committing
too often and consequently firing off warmup queries is the first place I'd
look. But I
agree with dc tech, 1,500 is wy more than I
: pos token offset
: 1 3 0-1
: 2 diphenyl 2-10
: 3 propanoic 11-20
: 3 diphenylpropanoic 2-20
: Say someone enters the query string 3-diphenylpropanoic
:
: The query parser I'm using transforms this into a phrase query and the
: indexed form is missed because based the positions of the terms '3'
You weren't really clear on how you are generating your autocomplete
results -- ie: via TermsComponent on your main index? or via a
search on a custom index where each document is a word to suggested?
Assuming the later, then the approach you describe below sounds good to
me, but it doesn't
Hi,
I have a use case where i get a document and a list of events that has
happened on the document. For example
First document:
Some text content
Events:
Event TypeEvent By Event Time
Update Pramod 06062010 2:30:00
Update Raj 06062010 2:30:00
Once I want to create a large index, can I split the index on different nodes
and the merge all the indexs to one node.
Any further suggestion for this case?
First of all I hope that in schema you have mentioned for fields
indexed=true and stored=true...
Next if you have done so... and now just search as q=landmark:piza... you
will get one result set only..
Note : There is one constraint about applying analyzers and tokenizers... IF
you apply white
Yeah right... This query will do it
http://localhost:8090/solr/select/?q=*:*version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onwt=json
This will do your work... This is more liike using xsl transformation
supported by solr..:)
Regards,
Rajani Maski
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Mark Allan
65 matches
Mail list logo