Thank you Otis. It solved the problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-1-4-1-to-SOLR-1-3-issues-backward-compatability-issue-tp1649789p1664057.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
So where does translation take place between the QUERIER's time zone, and the
eventual VIEWER's time zone?
That is done all at the application level?
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
better idea to learn
Hi,
I have two fields in the bean class, id and title.
After adding the bean to SOLR, I want to search for, say kitten, in all
defined fields in the bean, like this -- query.setQuery( kitten); --
But I get results only when I affix the bean field name before the search
text like this --
I have two fields in the bean class, id and title.
After adding the bean to SOLR, I want to search for, say
kitten, in all
defined fields in the bean, like this -- query.setQuery(
kitten); --
But I get results only when I affix the bean field name
before the search
text like this --
Hello,
What does your schema look like? Have you defined a catch all field and
copy every value from all your other fields in it with a copyField /
directive?
Cheers,
-- Savvas
On 8 October 2010 08:30, Subhash Bhushan subhash.bhus...@stratalabs.inwrote:
Hi,
I have two fields in the bean
Hi,
I have the following field defined in my schema:
fieldType name=name_field class=solr.StrField positionIncrementGap=100
omitNorms=false
analyzer
tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.StandardFilterFactory/
filter
Hi,
We've used iSCSI SANs with 6x1TB 15k SAS drives RAID10 in production
environments, and this works very well for both reads and writes. We
also have FibreChannel environments, and this is faster as you would
expect. It's also a lot more expensive.
The performance bottleneck will have more to
Hi thanks for the info.
The hardware guys made it possible for me to do some testing on an ISCSI
device, and it looks good so far. I have no idea what the hardware is,
but I'm getting about the same throughput as the local disks.
We are now looking into how it will scale if multiple machines
Hello,
Try searching for name_de:(das urteil). A search for name_de:das urteil will
search for das in *name_de* and for urteil in the default field (e.g.
catch all field).
Hope that helps,
-- Savvas
On 8 October 2010 09:00, Thomas Kellerer spam_ea...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
I have the following
Correct. You get back what you push in.
Of course if your index is for users in one time zone only, you may insert the
local time to Solr, and everything will work well. However, if you operate an
index with international users, you'd want to make sure you convert to/from UTC
in your
On 10/5/2010 10:38 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
That fixed it. Thank you. If I have time, I'll peek at the
patternfilter source code and see if I can figure out how to make it
optionally remove empty terms. For me, it's not terribly critical,
because my database is the bottleneck in my indexing
Hi there,
I have recently upgraded our Solr instance and have reindexed all of the items
in our store, and for at least one search I am getting some unusual error
messages back for a search that previously worked. It reads as follows:
HTTP Status 500 - Invalid shift value in prefixCoded string
Morning all,
I would like to ngram a company name field in our index. I have read about the
costs of doing so in the great David Smiley Solr 1.4 book and just to get
started I have followed his example in setting up an ngram field type as
follows:
fieldType name=text_substring
Hi,
The first thing I would try is to go to the analysis page, enter your test
data, and report back what each analysis stage prints out:
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/analysis.jsp
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 8. okt. 2010, at 14.19,
Hi,
Yep, I was just looking at the analyzer jsp. The ngrams *do* exist as expected,
so it's not my configuration that is at fault (he says)
Index Analyzer
sh ho oo ot te er sho hoo oot ote
ter shoohootooteotershoot hoote
How come your query analyser spits out grams? It isn't configured to do so or
you posted an older field definition. Anyway, do you actually search on your
new field?
On Friday, October 08, 2010 02:46:08 pm Allistair Crossley wrote:
Hi,
Yep, I was just looking at the analyzer jsp. The
Hello dear Solr Users..
As far as I understand, I am able to process stuff with analyzers (and
in there with tokenizers and filters and whatnot)
before indexing, but is it also possible to do that before storing the
input into a field?
What I want to do is to store some search words from
Oh my. I am basically being a total monkey. Every time I was changing my
schema.xml to try new things out I was then reindexing our staging server's
index instead of my local dev index so no changes were occurring locally.
Dear me.
This is working now, surprise.
On Oct 8, 2010, at 8:53 AM,
I have indexed my website in lucene and search is working effectively. I now
want to make an algorithm wherein I could count the quantum of keywords used
repetitively in documents like the one mentioned below:
gold tips, silver tips, tips for crude oil, commodity tips on mobile, free
commodity
Hey thanks guys! This all makes sense now. I'm using a text field and
it's giving good results of course.
Matt
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
Matt - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2145
Erik
On Oct 7, 2010, at 23:38 , Jonathan
Hello dear Solr Users..
As far as I understand, I am able to process stuff with analyzers (and
in there with tokenizers and filters and whatnot)
before indexing, but is it also possible to do that before storing the
input into a field?
What I want to do is to store some search words from
Well, a lot of this is working but not all.
Consider the company name Shooters Inc
My ngram field is able to match queries to the name for shoot and hoot and so
on. This works.
However consider the company name
Location Scotland
If I query scot I get one result back - but it's for a company
I don't know if sending the wrong content type results in this error message
but you must send the proper content type header, text/xml.
On Friday, October 08, 2010 03:57:33 pm Dennis Brundage wrote:
I am just getting started with Solr and have successfully run through the
tutorial. I now
Is it possible to have certain query terms not effect score, if that
same query term is present in a field? For example, I have an index of
hotels. Each hotel has a name and city. If the name of a hotel has the
name of the city in it's name field, I want to completely ignore
that and not have it
Hi All,
I am using Solr 1.3 in my project. Just wanted to know if there is any other
way by which below mentioned queries will return the same results:
Gruyère-and-Zucchini
Gruyere-and-Zucchini
The first query has accented characters in it. I was just going through the
Solr tokenizers and
Hi all,
Just to let you know, deleting the index and reindexing our data appears to
have fixed this problem, at least for the moment. My guess is that the old
index wasn't deleted cleanly, as I assumed it had been.
Thanks
Jon
On 8 Oct 2010, at 12:14, Jon Poulton wrote:
Hi there,
I have
Can anyone help me on how to remove myself from this mailing list. The
emails don't come with an opt-out link nor can I find anywhere else to
go to remove my email address. Any help would be really appreciated!
Steve
Life is difficult: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=unsubscribe+from+solr
On Friday, October 08, 2010 05:50:42 pm Steve Reichgut wrote:
Can anyone help me on how to remove myself from this mailing list. The
emails don't come with an opt-out link nor can I find anywhere else to
go to remove my email
Markus Jelsma-2 wrote:
I don't know if sending the wrong content type results in this error
message
but you must send the proper content type header, text/xml.
Thanks Markus. I thought uploading a file from an HTML form required
multipart/form-data.
Anyway, I did try changing it to
Thanks for your time responding to this. I have decided also to go down the
route of cron-scheduled Perl LWP pings to DIH + deltaQueries. This seems to
work inline with what the business requires and for the index size.
Thanks again
On Oct 7, 2010, at 7:46 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On
OK, great. No worrying about which time zone the server is running in with
Solr, LOL! Databases and server side languages and cron scripts OTOH . . .
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
better idea to
Thanks to anyone who spent time looking at this. In the future, should
anyone else run across this, I got it working by adding the name attribute
to the input type=file tag. Final script looks like:
html
head
/head
body
form action=http://localhost.:4747/solr/update;
Hi,
I am indexing the data using DIH.Data coming from mysql.Each document
contains 30 fields.Some of the fields are multi valued.When i am trying to
index 10 million records it taking more time to index.
Any body has suggestions to speed up indexing process?Any suggestions on
solr admin level
Right. You're requiring that every document have an ID (via uniqueKey), but
there's nothing
magic about DIH that'll automagically parse a PDF file and map something
into your ID
field.
So you have to create a unique ID before you send your doc to Curl. I'm
pretty sure you
can specify
Boosting doesn't necessarily put documents in a particular order. Boosting
just #tends#
to make the doc score higher. What do you see if you add debugQuery=on?
That'll tell
you why docs scored as they did.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Shanmugavel SRD
srdshanmuga...@gmail.comwrote:
not that I know of. Do note that whether the query has the accent filter
active or not MUST
be matched with the index-time filter. In other words, if you indexed with
the filter but
search without it or vice-versa you won't get the resultsyou expect.
Also note that no matter what, the original
Thanks for letting us know...
Erick
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Jon Poulton jon.poul...@vyre.com wrote:
Hi all,
Just to let you know, deleting the index and reindexing our data appears to
have fixed this problem, at least for the moment. My guess is that the old
index wasn't deleted
Thanks for the info - I'll try out this patch.
-Peter
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Dyer, James james.d...@ingrambook.com wrote:
Look at SOLR-2010 which has patches for 1.4.1 and trunk. It works with the
spellcheck collate functionality and ensures that collations are returned
only if
Alex,
If I understand correctly, you are taking people's search terms and storing
them
in some Solr index?
Before you store them you want to convert them to their root form.
In that case a custom UpdateRequestProcessor (in which you'd add your code that
does this conversion) should do the job.
-- Forwarded message --
From: ankita shinde ankitashinde...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 8:19 AM
Subject: solr-user
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
hello,
Is there any api in SolrJ that calls the dataImportHandler to execute
commands like full-import and delta-import.
Please start a new thread with this topic in the subject line.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:37 PM, ankita shinde
ankitashinde...@gmail.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: ankita shinde ankitashinde...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 8:19 AM
Subject: solr-user
To:
41 matches
Mail list logo
