Hi
I have the following search query LTJ Bukem - Horizons
When this is processed by solr it subtracts Horizons from the search e.g.
str name=parsedquery_toString+text:LTJ +text:Bukem -text:Horizons/str
I do not want to subtract Horizons from the search, but to ignore/remove the
minus sign, to
I have the following search query LTJ Bukem - Horizons
When this is processed by solr it subtracts Horizons from
the search e.g.
str name=parsedquery_toString+text:LTJ
+text:Bukem -text:Horizons/str
I do not want to subtract Horizons from the search, but to
ignore/remove the
minus
While the year zero exists, month zero and day zero don't. And while
APIs ofttimes accept those values (ie day zero is the last day of the
previous month) the ISO 8601 spec does not accept it as far as I know.
On 11/18/2010 4:26 AM, Dennis Gearon wrote:
I thought that that value was a
Hi,
I've used three different JMX clients to query
solr/core:id=org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache,type=queryResultCache
and
solr/core:id=org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache,type=documentCache
beans and they appear to return old cache information.
As new searchers come online, the newer
This happening because query parser pre-tokenizes your query using whites
paces. It is tokenized before it reaches your query analyzer.
And you are using KeywordTokenizer in your field definition.
Is there a special reason for you to use KeywordTokenizer ?
--- On Thu, 11/18/10, Chamnap Chhorn
I think this question is more related to Lucene query search but I'm posting
here becuase I feel more Solr User :-)
I have multiple value field named field1 containint codes separated by a space
doc
field name=iddoc1/field
field name=field1A BB1 B BB2 C BB3/field
field name=field1A CC1 B CC2 C
On Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:36:40 pm Dario Rigolin wrote:
Sorry wrong query:
q=field1:(A BB1 AND B BB2)
Dario
Hello,
i have a running solr 1.3 installation and would like to migrate it to
solr 3 in order to get speed improvements by using the multiple threads
for indexing.
When starting SOLR 3, i get the following error message:
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unknown fieldtype 'textfc'
hi,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 05:00:04PM +0100, Peter Blokland wrote:
pubdate:([* TO NOW] OR (NOT *))
i've gone back to the examples provided with solr 1.4.1. the
standard example has 19 documents, one of which has a date-field
called 'incubationdate_dt'. so the query
incubationdate_dt:[* TO
On a quick glance: You're trying to sort on a tokenized field,
which is not good. Not good at all. You'll go 'round and 'round
and it'll never give you what you want.
Consider your example Whithers, Alfred Robert The
WhitespaceTokenizer breaks this up into three tokens
(I'm ignoring everything
What version of Solr are you using? Could we see the actual query
you're sending?
And the dismax definition, and perhaps the relevant parts of schema.xml.
There's not much information to go on here to help debug this.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:21 AM, sivaprasad
Well, the claim is that eDismax supports full Lucene syntax, so I
assume so.
Here's the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553which indicates that you
have two choices: Trunk or the 3.x build, see
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/
See below:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Sasank Mudunuri sas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been poking around the JavaDocs a bit, and it looks like it's possible
to directly read the index using the Solr Java API. Hoping to clarify a
couple of things --
1) Do I need to read the index
average time per request is
the total time spent servicing X requests divided by X (in milliseconds I
believe).
If no searches are being processed, this number doesn't change.
It's a measure of how long it takes, on average, to service a single
request.
avrRequests per second is the total time
All,
I am trying apply the Solr spell check component functionality to our
data.
The configuration set up I needed to make for it by updating config.xml and
schema.xml is done as follows..
Please let me know if any errors in it.
I am not getting any suggestions in suggestion tags of solr
It does support wildcard queries - we are using that feature from
edismax
-Original Message-
From: Swapnonil Mukherjee [mailto:swapnonil.mukher...@gettyimages.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 1:39 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Does edismax support wildcard queries?
We have recently upgraded some of our solr instances to 1.4.1 from 1.3.
Interestingly both these parameter values got increased after our upgrade.
When avgRequestsPerSecond increases, avgTimePerRequest should be increased.
But it is not in our case..
Any thoughts ?
--
View this message in
I did a quick grep through the directory listing of the Solr 3.1 source,
the only part of your analysis chain that came up empty was
HTMLStripWhitespaceTokenizerFactory. I think you'll have to replace it
with something like this:
charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/
Thanks. I downloaded and built the solr trunk to test for wild card queries and
as you guys reported, edismax does support wildcards and it works beautifully.
My next challenge will be to apply these patches
1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553
2.
Hi Rajani,
some notes:
* try spellcheck.q=curst or completely without spellcheck.q but with q
* compared to the normal q parameter spellcheck.q can have a different
analyzer/tokenizer and is used if present
* do not do spellcheck.build=true for every request (creating the
spellcheck index
Thanks for the tip. This seems to work ;)
But now i ran into another problem - im trying to use the threads
parameter in my entitys in order to speed up the index creation. as soon
as i use the threads parameter (e.g. threads=2) i get the following
errors in my log:
Hi,
is there a way to make solr respect the order of token matches when the query
is a multi-term string?
Here's an example:
Query String: John C
Indexed Strings:
- John Cage
- Cargill John
This will return both indexed strings as a result. However, Cargill John
should not match in that
I'm using solr as a part of what could be described as a content
management system. I don't have a problem with uploading the files
independently of Solr, but I'm trying to avoid sending excess data.
I'm also trying to avoid any solutions that are system dependent.
Perhaps another option would be
No, that's not true. As long as you're not limited by some resource,
avgRequestsPerSecond can grow without impacting avgTimePerRequest
much.
avgTimePerRequest is the elapsed time from the beginning of Solr handling
the request to the end, measured in clock time. Say it takes 100 ms. Of
that 100
I am using the solr admin to query the document. The returned document is
showing old values.
Lance,
I will not be able to post my configuration but i will create a simple
schema just to highlight the issue.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
How are
Hi,
Forgot to mention solr version number:
Solr Implementation Version: 2010-04-30_08-05-41 939580 - hudson -
2010-04-30 08:37:22
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Pramod Goyal pramod.go...@gmail.comwrote:
I am using the solr admin to query the document. The returned document is
showing old
On Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:42:49 pm Dario Rigolin wrote:
On Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:36:40 pm Dario Rigolin wrote:
Sorry wrong query:
q=field1:(A BB1 AND B BB2)
Dario
q=field1:(A BB1 B BB2~10)
I discovered that proximity search works well with multiple terms
Ciao.
Dario.
Hi Peter!
* I believe the NRT patches are included in the 4.x trunk. I don't
think there's any support as yet in 3x (uses features in Lucene 3.0).
I'll investage how much effort it is to update to solr4
* For merging, I'm talking about commits/writes. If you merge while
commits are going
Erick,
Thanks a lot for explaining about these two fields.
Could you please let us know which one we have to look for if we have to
monitor the performance? avgTimePerRequest OR avgRequestsPerSecond.
Thanks,
SRD
--
View this message in context:
Ahmet,
I modified the schema as follows: (Added more fields for faceting)
field name=title type=text indexed=true stored=true
omitNorms=true /
field name=author type=text indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=true omitNorms=true /
field name=authortype type=text indexed=true stored=true
Maybe I didn't fully understood what you explained: but doesn't this mean
that you'll have one index per day?
Or are you overwriting, via replicating, every shard and the number of shard
is fixed?
And why are you replicating from the local replica to the next shard? (why
not directly from
Hi,
i'm suddenly getting a LockReleaseFailedException when starting a full-import
using the Dataimporthandler:
org.apache.lucene.store.LockReleaseFailedException: Cannot forcefully unlock a
NativeFSLock which is held by another indexer component
This worked without problems until just now.
Hi,
I am going crazy but which config is necessary to include the missing doc 2?
I have:
doc1 tw:aBc
doc2 tw:abc
Now a query aBc returns only doc 1 although when I try doc2 from
admin/analysis.jsp
then the term text 'abc' of the index gets highlighted as intended.
I even indexed a simple
Hi,
Please add preserveOriginal=1 to your WDF [1] definition and reindex (or
just try with the analysis page).
This will make sure the original input token is being preserved along the
newly generated tokens. If you then pass it all through a lowercase filter, it
should match both documents.
Does yours need to be once a day?
no, I only thought you use one day :-)
so you don't or do you have 31 shards?
having a look at Solr Cloud or Katta - could be useful
here in dynamically allocating shards.
ah, thx! I will take a look at it (after trying solr4)!
Regards,
Peter.
Hi,
Please add preserveOriginal=1 to your WDF [1] definition and reindex (or
just try with the analysis page).
but it is already there!?
filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory protected=protwords.txt
generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1
catenateAll=0
Hi,
I'm not sure what QParser you're using but with the DismaxQParser you can
specify slop on explicit phrase queries, did you set it because it can make a
difference. Check it out:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin#qs_.28Query_Phrase_Slop.29
Cheers,
Hi,
is there a way to
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Peter Karich peat...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi,
Please add preserveOriginal=1 to your WDF [1] definition and reindex
(or
just try with the analysis page).
but it is already there!?
filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory protected=protwords.txt
Hi,
I searched google and the wiki to find out how I can force a full re-index
of all of my content and I came up with zilch. My goal is to be able to
adjust the weight settings, re-index my entire database and then search my
site and view the results of my weight adjustments.
I am using
avgTimePerRequest is the important one for your users. They don't care if
you're processing
a million QPS, they care how long *their* query took. But you also have to
pay attention
to longest response times
Best
Erick
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Shanmugavel SRD
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Eric Martin e...@makethembite.com wrote:
Hi,
I searched google and the wiki to find out how I can force a full re-index
of all of my content and I came up with zilch. My goal is to be able to
adjust the weight settings, re-index my entire database and then
The changes that you made have no relevance to the fields you named
in your query. Things like author, format, etc. You have to ask to
facet by your new fields...
And if you did send a different query, did you reindex after your config
changes?
It would be better if you made a habit of showing
Ah, I am using an ApacheSolr module in Drupal and used nutch to insert the data
into the Solr index. When I using Jetty I could just delete the data contents
in sshd and then restart the service forcing the reindex.
Currently, the ApacheSolr module for Drupal allows for a 200 record re-index
Peter,
I recently had this issue, and I had to set splitOnCaseChange=0 to
keep the word delimiter filter from doing what you describe. Can you
try that and see if it helps?
- Ken
Hi Ken,
yes this would solve my problem,
but then I would lost a match for 'SuperMario' if I query 'mario',
We're working on a budgeting for an environment to begin using SOLR in
Production and the question came up about whether or not we should pay for
commercial support on the container that SOLR runs under. We've pretty much
decided to run on JBOSS simply because that's what we use company-wide.
no, I only thought you use one day :-)
so you don't or do you have 31 shards?
No, we use 1 shard per month - e.g. 7 shards will hold 7 month's of data.
It can be set to 1 day, but you would need to have a huge amount of
data in a single day to warrant doing that.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at
mets/alto is an xml standard for describing physical objects. In this
case, we're describing books. The mets file holds the metadata (author,
title, etc.), the alto file is the physical description (words on the
page, formatting of the page). So it's a one (mets) to many (alto)
Hi I'm pretty new to SOLR and interested in getting an idea about a simple
standard way of setting up a production SOLR service. I have read the FAQs
and the wiki around SOLR security and performance but have not found much on
a best practice architecture. I'm particularly interested in best
Hi,
It's a common practice not to use Solr as a frontend. Almost all deployed
instances live in the backend near the database servers. And if Solr is being
put to the front, it's still being secured by a proxy.
Setting up staging and production instances depend on your need. If the load
is
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Eric Martin e...@makethembite.com wrote:
Ah, I am using an ApacheSolr module in Drupal and used nutch to insert the
data into the Solr index. When I using Jetty I could just delete the data
contents in sshd and then restart the service forcing the reindex.
We currently have a 30G index with 73M of .tii files running on a
machine with 4 Intel 2.27GHz Xeons with 15G of memory.
About once a second a process indexes ~10-20 smallish documents using
the XML Update Handler. A commit happens after every update. However we
see this behaviour even if the
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:01:09AM +, me said:
I'm baffled - I've had way bigger indexes than this before with no
performance problems. At first it was the frequent updates but the fact
that it happens even when the indexer isn't running seems to put paid to
that.
More information:
-
Well, this field is a keyphrase. I want to make it to case-insensitive
single token field. It matches only when the user types the same as data in
solr.
What's wrong with that? Does it can be done in another way?
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
This
Does it need 10G to run? Have you cycled it down to, say, 4-5G as a
test? Large memory sizes can just cause more garbage collection.
What is the disk activity when this happens? Do you have paging turned
on? I generally turn it off- having things go into page-thrash mode is
lame.
How many
Some ideas:
XPathEntityProcessor parses a very limited XPath syntax. However, you
can add an XSL script as an attribute, and this somehow gets called
instead.
With this, you might be able to create an XPath that selects out every
combination that you want.
A second option: SOLR-1499 is an
Have you tried removing the index files and rebuilding it from
scratch? The index could be corrupted. It's rare, but it does happen.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Pramod Goyal pramod.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Forgot to mention solr version number:
Solr Implementation Version:
If they are on the same server, you do not need to replicate.
If you only do queries, the query server can use the same index
directory as the master. Works quite well. Both have to have the same
LockPolicy in solrconfig.xml. For security reasons, I would run the
query server as a different user
Hello Peter,
Thanks For reply :)I did spellcheck.q=Curst as you said ...Query is
like:
http://localhost:8909/solr/select/?spellcheck.q=Curstversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onspellcheck=true
I am getting this error :(
HTTP Status 500 - null java.lang.NullPointerException at
And If I am trying to do :
http://localhost:8909/solr/select/?spellcheck.q=Curstversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onspellcheck=true
q=Curst
The XML OUTPUT IS
-http://localhost:8090/solr/select/?spellcheck.q=Curstversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onq=Curst#
response
Did you configure below one in your default request handler?
arr name=last-components
strspellcheck/str
/arr
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spell-Check-Component-Functionality-tp1923954p1929124.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
Hi
I am searching for keywords: ad testing (without quotes). I want result
containing both words on the top. But it is giving me results containing
words: ad test. Is it correct or any logic behind that i.e. will it consider
the word test also ?
Please help
--
Thanks,
Pawan Darira
In my app,I want to search numdocs for some queries. I see SolrIndexSearcher
has two methods:
public int numDocs(Query a, DocSet b)
public int numDocs(Query a, Query b)
But these're not fit for me.For search's params,I get q and fq, and q' results
are not in filterCache.But above methods are
62 matches
Mail list logo
