Jason,
have a look on
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Accessing_request_parameters
, this might help you out.
If not, you'd give us a quick example of what you plan to do?
Regards
Stefan
Hi,
Talk to the ManifoldCF guys - they have successfully implemented support for
document level security for many repositories including CMC/ECMs and may have
some hints for you to write your own Authority connector against your system,
which will fetch the ACL for the document and index it
Hi,
Ah cool - missed that bit! Will give that a go (as it will be handy for
passing along other paramaters too)
Cheers
Andy
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: I know its possible to do via adding sort= , but the Perl module
:
Which field you are copping id to ng_text
or description to ng_text
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
http://lucidimagination.com
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-copyfield-tp2663873p2663998.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Query on facet field results...
When I run a facet query on some field say : facet=on
facet.field=StudyID I get list of distinct StudyID list with the count that
tells that how many times did this study occur in the search query. But I
also needed the count of these distinct StudyID
Hi,
I need to show a facets on Category and then I need the category id in the
href link. For this what I 'm trying to do is create a field which will
store ID|Category in the schema and split it in the UI.
Also I have Category and category id 's indexed .
Categories are multivalued as well,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Prav Buz buz.p...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
I need to show a facets on Category and then I need the category id in the
href link. For this what I 'm trying to do is create a field which will
store ID|Category in the schema and split it in the UI.
Also I have
Hi,
Yes I already have different fields for category and category Id , and they
are in same order when retrieved from solr
for eg:
IDs
1
3
4
5
names
a
b
c
d
e
id 1 is of name a and id 5 is of name e. but when I sort the category names
, looses this order as they are not related in any manner in
hi
it seems my mail is judged as spam.
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient
domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further
information about the cause of this error. The error that the other
Problem of Replication Reservation Durationhi all,
I tried to send this mail to solr dev mail list but it tells me this is
a spam. So I send it again and to lucene dev too.
The replication handler in solr 1.4 which we used seems to be a little
problematic in some extreme situation.
The
ok thank you!!!
2011/3/10 Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu
On 3/10/2011 8:15 AM, Gastone Penzo wrote:
Thank you very much. i understand the difference beetween qs and ps but
not
what pf is...is it necessary to use ps?
It's not neccesary to use anything, including Solr.
pf: Will take
Hi,
I have received the following error, when I try to insert a document into
solr,
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: ERROR: multiple values
encountered for non multiValued copy field id: 272327_1
In my schema.xml, I have specified,
id
In the query, I have passed as
You're copying the id field rather than description into ng_text. Try:
copyField source=description dest=ng_text/
Best
Erick
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:11 AM, nidhi gupta wdnidhigu...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
I want to implement type ahead styling feature for description field.For that
I defined
There's nothing that I know of that gives you this, but it's
simple to count the members of the list yourself...
Best
Erick
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:34 AM, rajini maski rajinima...@gmail.com wrote:
Query on facet field results...
When I run a facet query on some field say : facet=on
Thinking out loud here, but would it work to just have ugly
categories? Instead of splitting them up, just encode them like
1|a
2|b
3|c
or some such. Then split them back up again and display
the name to the user and use the ID in the URL
Best
Erick
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Prav
Show us the input please? But what that means is that you
have a field in your input document twice, something like
field1val1field1
field1val2field1
where field1 is single valued. Or, more correctly, a field
for which you have NOT specified multiValued=true.
Note that multiValued is case
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
I have post that value only one time.
The following are the list of values that I have posted,
Any documentation on index Defaults Section and main index section that is
in solrconfig.xml -- Solr1.4.1 I want to
understand the terminology of these parameters and how are they inter
connected?mergeFactor10/mergeFactorramBufferSizeMB32/ramBufferSizeMB
What about using the BitwiseQueryParserPlugin?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1913
You could encode your documents with a series of permissions based on
Bit flags and then OR them on query.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: r...@intelligencebank.com
hi,,
seems I have identified the issue.
In the code I am using
ContentStreamBase.StringStream stream = new
ContentStreamBase.StringStream(streamData);
If the streamData contains name=ID , ie, ID value then already I set
copyfield for uniqueid as id. Hence, It throws error.
Seems, it check
Thank you Jan, I will take a look at the MainfoldCF.
So it seems that the solution is basically to implement something outside of
Solr for permission control.
thanks,
canal
From: Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri,
This question is probably not a completely Solr question but it's related to
it. I'm dealing with a Japanese Solr application in which I would like to be
able to search in any of the Japanese Alphabets. The content can also be in
any Japanese Alphabet. I've been thinking in this solution: Convert
What exactly is phrase and query slop? What technically is a slop?
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Mar 11, 2011, at 4:15 AM, Gastone Penzo gastone.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
ok thank you!!!
2011/3/10 Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu
On 3/10/2011 8:15 AM, Gastone Penzo wrote:
Thank you
There is my patch to do that. SOLR-2242
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Mar 11, 2011, at 1:34 AM, rajini maski rajinima...@gmail.com wrote:
Query on facet field results...
When I run a facet query on some field say : facet=on
facet.field=StudyID I get list of distinct StudyID list
AFAIK, the difference is that the phrase slop applies to the phrase queries
generated automatically by dismax and applied to the fields in pf. Query
Slop (qs) is the phrase slop applied to a phrase explicitly specified by the
user, which will be applied to all the Query Fields (qf).
An easy way
Tomás
That wont really work, transliteration to Romaji works for individual terms
only so you would need to tokenize the Japanese prior to transliteration. I am
not sure what tool you plan to use for transliteration, I have used ICU in the
past and from what I can tell it does not
Hey folks,
Google Summer of Code 2011 is very close and the Project Applications
Period has started recently. Now it's time to get some excited students
on board for this year's GSoC.
I encourage students to submit an application to the Google Summer of Code
web-application. Lucene Solr are
We need to see the relevant portions of your schema file, particularly the
uniqueKey definition and any copyfields directives.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:29 AM, rahul asharud...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,,
seems I have identified the issue.
In the code I am using
Hi,
Thanks Erik, yes that's what I've done for now, but was wondering if it's
the best way :)
thanks
Praveen
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
Thinking out loud here, but would it work to just have ugly
categories? Instead of splitting them up,
Why not index it as-is? Solr can handle Unicode.
Transliterating hiragana to katakana is a very weird idea. I cannot imagine how
that would help.
You will need some sort of tokenization to find word boundaries. N-grams work
OK for search, but are really ugly for highlighting.
As far as I
Good question about transliteration, the issue has to do with recall, for
example, I can write 'Toyota' as 'トヨタ' or 'とよた' (Katakana and Hiragana
respectively), not doing the transliteration will miss results. You will find
that the big search engines do the transliteration for you
On Mar 10, 2011, at 10:48 PM, go canal wrote:
But in real world, any content management systems need full text search; so
the
question is to how to support search with permission control.
I have yet to see a Search Engine that provides some sort of Content
Management
features like we
If it works, it's performant and not too messy it's a good way :-) . You can
also consider just faceting on Id, and use the id to fetch the categoryname
through sql / nosql.
That way your logic is seperated from your presentation, which makes
extending (think internationalizing, etc.) easier. Not
Why not just add a security field in Solr and use fq to limit to the users
permissions?
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Mar 11, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org wrote:
On Mar 10, 2011, at 10:48 PM, go canal wrote:
But in real world, any content management systems
On Mar 11, 2011, at 9:32 AM, Bill Bell wrote:
Why not just add a security field in Solr and use fq to limit to the users
permissions?
You can. When permissions change, you need to reload every affected document.
You also need to build the whole security filtering from scratch instead of
About the 'having to reindex when permissions change'-problem:
have a look at ExternalFileField
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/schema/ExternalFileField.html
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/schema/ExternalFileField.htmlwhich
enables you to reload a file without
the issue has to do with recall, for example, I can write 'Toyota' as 'トヨタ'
or 'とよた' (Katakana and Hiragana respectively), not doing the transliteration
will miss results.
Exactly, that's my problem, searching on a different alphabet than the one
on which it was indexed a document.
François, thank
Sounds more like generating synonyms than conflating everything to one set of
kana.
Why not a filter that does that transliteration and adds a token at the some
position?
wunder
On Mar 11, 2011, at 9:49 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
the issue has to do with recall, for example, I can
Yes there can be cases where user is allowed a subset of a content type,
or a combination of content type groups and individual documents, where
this would break down.
And yes, afaik, if you want to update the permissions in the document
(seems slightly strange, since you would potentially many
Tomás
The ICU code base is used by a *lot* so I think it is safe to say that it works
ok :)
François
On Mar 11, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
the issue has to do with recall, for example, I can write 'Toyota' as 'トヨタ'
or 'とよた' (Katakana and Hiragana respectively), not
You could certainly do it that way if you wanted.
The one point I would make here is that from a linguistic POV these are not
synonyms but are the same term written in a different alphabet.
François
On Mar 11, 2011, at 12:51 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
Sounds more like generating synonyms
Sweet, those links very very useful :).
and should most definitely help :)
One overriding concern I have:
1) if I were to simply update the config to use a different mergeFactor, and
restart the solr server, (would it then adjust the segments accordingly?) or
would I need to start from
Hello All,
I searched for this but couldn't find a convincing answer.
I'm planning to use Lucene/Solr in a tool for indexing and searching
documents. I'm thinking of if I use Lucene directly instead of Solr, will it
improves the performance of the search?(in terms of time taken for indexing
or
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:21 PM, sivaram yogendra.bopp...@gmail.com wrote:
I searched for this but couldn't find a convincing answer.
I'm planning to use Lucene/Solr in a tool for indexing and searching
documents. I'm thinking of if I use Lucene directly instead of Solr, will it
improves the
Thanks for the quick reply Yonik,
So you are saying that it all depends on how we setup the Solr? In a
performance perspective, does Solr lags behind Lucene because it's a layer
above Lucene to our application or will it have a better indexing and
searching techniques than Lucene? (when talking
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:07 PM, sivaram yogendra.bopp...@gmail.com wrote:
So you are saying that it all depends on how we setup the Solr? In a
performance perspective, does Solr lags behind Lucene because it's a layer
above Lucene to our application or will it have a better indexing and
I have seen little repeatable empirical evidence for the usual answer
mostly no.
With respect: everyone in the Solr universe seems to answer this
question in the way Yonik has.
However, with a large number of requests the XML
serialization/deserialization must have some, likely significant,
what's the quickest and most efficient way to access a doc by its primary
key? suppose I already know a document's unique id and simply want to fetch
it without issuing a sophisticated query.
Thanks,
Ben
Hello,
I am denormalizing a map of string,float into a single lucene document
by storing it as key1|score1 key2|score2 In Solr, I pull this in
using the following analyzer definition.
fieldtype name=payloads stored=false indexed=true
class=solr.TextField
analyzer
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:58 PM, onlinespend...@gmail.com
onlinespend...@gmail.com wrote:
what's the quickest and most efficient way to access a doc by its primary
key? suppose I already know a document's unique id and simply want to fetch
it without issuing a sophisticated query.
Bypassing
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
That's an apples to oranges comparison - lucene is a library and solr
is a server.
I partially agree ;-)
Lucene is a library and Solr is an http server wrapper-plus around Lucene.
Solr also adds (all sorts of
Looking at the API doc, it seems that only floating value is currently
supported, is it true?
thanks,
canal
From: Geert-Jan Brits gbr...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sat, March 12, 2011 1:42:38 AM
Subject: Re: Solr and Permissions
About
Thank you, that is the best explanation I have ever heard.
We should add to the Wiki (given that is is correct).
On 3/11/11 9:05 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK, the difference is that the phrase slop applies to the phrase
queries
generated automatically by dismax
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*facet=truefacet.field=StudyIDface
t.mincount=1facet.limit=-1f.StudyID.facet.namedistinct=1
Would do what you want I believe...
On 3/11/11 8:51 AM, Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com wrote:
There is my patch to do that. SOLR-2242
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
(11/03/12 10:28), go canal wrote:
Looking at the API doc, it seems that only floating value is currently
supported, is it true?
Right. And it is just for changing score by using float values in the file,
so it cannot be used for filtering.
Koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Thanks Bill Bell . .This query works after applying the patch you refered
to, is it? Please can you let me know how do I need to update the current
war (apache solr 1.4.1 )file with this new patch? Thanks a lot.
Thanks,
Rajani
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your suggestions, thanks to the great community too :)
regards
Praveen
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Geert-Jan Brits gbr...@gmail.com wrote:
If it works, it's performant and not too messy it's a good way :-) . You
can
also consider just faceting on Id, and use the id to
57 matches
Mail list logo
