Hi, All
I want to get the search result which is not sorted by anything.
Sorting by score take more time.
So, I want to disable sorting by score.
How can i do this?
Thanks, Jason.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/disable-sort-by-score-tp3057767p3057767.html
Synonyms feature to be enabled on documents in Solr.
I have one field in solr that has the content of a document.( say field name
: document_data).
The data in that field is :
Tamil Nadu state private school fee determination committee headed by
Justice Raviraja has submitted the private
Hi all
As far as I know, by using DIH it will read all the documents from database
(I am using SQLite v3) to memory.
Now I would like to ask if I have a lot of records (let say 7 millions), it
will put
All 7 millions record in memory, how can I avoid that?
There is a piece of documentation that
Hi rajini,
multi-word synonyms like private schools normally make problems.
See e.g. Solr-1-4-Enterprise-Search-Server Page 56:
For multi-word synonyms to work, the analysis must be applied at
index-time and with expansion so that both the original words and the
combined word get indexed. ...
Karsten,
I have tried for both the cases you mentioned below.
For WhitespaceTokenizerFactory that generates two tokens: private
schools and so i don't get results as required. It will initially split
private schools as private and schools and then try to match in
synonym filter. This fails
No, that doesn't work yet.
I think we'll need to enhance the Solr query parser in order to support
this.
If that is supported we don't need to use the DataMathParser and this a more
general solution also for other client libraries.
Martijn
On 12 June 2011 20:58, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com
It's easy to overlook, but all those relevance functions are
on trunk (4.0+) only, not the 3.x code branch..
Sum is a math function that's been in there for quite some time.
Best
Erick
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Jason Toy jason...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to use sorting by function
Can you back up and explain why you have this requirement?
Disabling ranking by relevance is fairly unusual in any decent
sized application.
And before you jump into this as a solution, have you tried
other ways of increasing performance? This may be an XY
problem, see:
Your question appears to
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Alucard alucard...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know, by using DIH it will read all the documents from database
(I am using SQLite v3) to memory.
That is incorrect. DIH does not read rows into memory, rather, only the set
of rows needed to create a Solr
I think the point is that you need to expand synonyms at
index time but not at query time. In the field type definitions you
provided, the expansion happens both at index and query
time
Or have you tried that already?
Best
Erick
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:46 AM, rajini maski
Thank you Shalin.
But when I google sqlite jdbc driver documentation, there is not so many
pages that describe such kind of parameters.
The most relevant one is this: http://www.xerial.org/trac/Xerial/wiki/SQLiteJDBC
Can you please tell me which resources I can reference to?
Thank you again.
str name=Total Requests made to DataSource16276/str
...
so I am doing a delta import of around 500,000 rows at a
time.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerDeltaQueryViaFullImport
We are using edismax for query and the query fired is (url:_2010)
http://redcarpet2.dm2.commvault.com:27000/solr/select/?q=url:
There is an (underscore) character before 2010
-Original Message-
From: Tirthankar Chatterjee [mailto:tchatter...@commvault.com]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 3:08 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Using Edismax
We are using edismax for query and the query fired is (url:_2010)
You haven't supplied the information that's really
needed to help here, please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
But at a guess your analysis chain contains
WordDelimiterFilterFactory, which is splitting
the input stream into tokens on letter/number
changes, and
Hi Everyone,
I am new to the Solr world and just started playing around with it. I had
everything up running and suddenly the Analyze functionality started
throwing an exception when i tried using it. It was working a few days ago
suddenly it stopped working started throwing this exception.
Hi Everyone,
I am trying to use Solrj to add documents to my solr index. In the process
of playing around with the implementation I noticed that when we add
documents in a batch to Solr the response back from solr is just - status
qtime. I am using Solr 3.1 right now.
I came across the
Dear All,
We are currently learning solr, and have some questions on multicore
setting.
First, is there a limitation on number of cores a solr instance can handle?
From what I can tell, a core is basically a entry in a Map, so there should
(virtually) not be any limits on how many cores one
I also got the same exception, anyone know how to solve this?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exceptions-in-Embedded-Solr-tp2007304p3057746.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Johannes Goll johannes.g...@gmail.com wrote:
However, sporadically, Jetty 6.1.2X (shipped with Solr 3.1.)
sporadically throws Socket connect exceptions when executing distributed
searches.
Are you using the exact jetty.xml that shipped with the solr example
I'm having an issue with how I can go about achieving this and I was
wondering if someone had any pointers...
My goal:
To produce searches where AndQueries are ORed with a SpanNearQuery,
therefore boosting the results higher because they appeared closer. The
only use case I'm concerned with is
Take a look at SOLR-445, I started down this road a while
ago but then got distracted. If you'd like to pick it up and
take it farther, feel free. I haven't applied that patch in a
while, so I don't know how easy it will be to apply.
Last I left it, it would do much of what you're asking for for
No, there's no a-priori limit to the number of cores Solr
can handle, most generally you run into issues
with machine memory (and its effect on performance) that
requires you to split the cores amongst separate machines
eventually. Only testing will tell you that point for your app.
Could simply adding a boosted phrase clause solve this?
In your example the query would become
(Tom Cruise Dancing) OR Tom Cruise Dancing~10^10.
The problem here is choosing the slop factor, but it might be
good enough with a reasonable number. This shouldn't
require any custom code at all
Hey Erick,
Thanks for the feedback, but I it doesn't particularly solve my problem.
The issue with doing a boosted phrase clause is that the terms have to be in
order to be considered a hit. I'm seeking a solution where the terms can be
near another term in any direction.
If I were to use a
Thanks Erick. Will certainly take a look.
I am looking to do this for binary objects since i have started with that.
-- karthik
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
Take a look at SOLR-445, I started down this road a while
ago but then got distracted.
Thanks to reply, Erick!
Actually, I need sort by score.
I was just curious that seach result without sorting is possible.
Then I found
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/MaxRows-and-disabling-sort-td2260650.html
In above context, Chris Hostetter-3 wrote
27 matches
Mail list logo
