Thank you for request! I'm did next request and all is ok
https://localhost:8443/solr/alfresco/select?wt=standard&q=TYPE:%22{http://www.test.com/test/test/model/content/0.1}field%22&indent=on&hl=true&hl.fl=TYPE
https://localhost:8443/solr/alfresco/select?wt=standard&q=TYPE:%22{http://www.test.com/
Hi all,
I need to find a way by which solr check and return for results for
misspelled search term.
Do anybody have any idea?
Thank You!!
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Search-for-misspelled-search-term-tp3529961p3529961.html
Sent from the Sol
Hi Shawn
That was so great of you to explain the architecture in such a detail. I
enjoyed reading it multiple times.
I have a question here:
You mentioned that we can use crc32(DocumentId)% NumServers. Now actually I am
using that in my data-config.xml in the sql query itself, something like:
Thanks for replying
I tried using "Trie" types for faceting solr but that did not solve the
problem. If I use Trie types(for e.g. I used tlong)...it shows "schema
mismatch error" as in FileListEntityProcessor api , fileSize has been
defined of type string. That means we can not apply facet.range on
This what i tried:
- Gone to the solr 3.1 directory which is downloaded from here.
http://www.trieuvan.com/apache//lucene/solr/3.1.0/apache-solr-3.1.0.tgz
- wget
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12493167/SOLR-2703.patch
- run the : patch -p0 -i SOLR-2703.patch --d
Hi Hoss,
Thanks for the detailed response.
My XY problem is:
1) I am trying to search for a complex query:
q={!type=edismax qf="abstract^0.02 title^0.08 categorysearch^0.05"
boost='eqsim(alltokens,"xyz")' v='+tokens5:"xyz" '}
Which answers my query needs. BUT, my boost function actually changes
How to apply this patch https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2703 with
solr 3.1 to install surround as plugin?
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> The "surround" query parser is fully wired into Solr trunk/4.0, if that
> helps. See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SurroundQue
Thanks Shawn. So to recap:
- Every "match" must be found after entire chain, not in the middle of the
chain.
- Suggested: and chain should be the same.
In my situation, if I make both of them the same, the result may be
misleading because it will also match other records that have the same
par
Spark:
Solr with RankingAlgorithm is not a plugin but a change of search
library from Lucene to RankingAlgorithm. Here is more info on the
changes you will need to make to your solrconfig.xml:
http://solr-ra.tgels.org/wiki/en/Near_Real_Time_Search
Regards,
- Nagendra Nagrajayya
http://solr-
On 11/22/2011 7:54 PM, Ellery Leung wrote:
I am searching for an email called: off...@officeofficeoffice.com. If I
search any text under 20 characters, result will be returned. But when I
search the whole string: off...@officeofficeoffice.com, no result return.
As you all see in the schema in
Hi there,
Is it possible to separate ACL index and document index and achieve to
search by user role in SOLR?
Currently my implementation is to index ACL with document, but the
document itself change frequently. I have to perform rebuild index
every time when ACL change. It's heavy for whole syst
Hi all
I am using Solr 3.4 with Win7 and Jetty.
When I do a search on a field, according to the "Analysis" from Solr, the
search string matches the index in the middle of the chain. Here is the
schema:
Hi Nagarajayya,
Thanks for your information. Do I need to change any configuration of my
current solr server to integrate your plugin?
Spark
2011/11/22 Nagendra Nagarajayya
> Yu:
>
> To get Near Real Time update in Solr 1.4.1 you will need to use Solr 1.4.1
> with RankingAlgorithm. This allow
(11/11/22 22:30), VladislavLysov wrote:
Hello!!!
I have a trouble with Solr highlighting. I have any document with next
fields- "TYPE", "DBID" and others. When i do next request -
https://localhost:8443/solr/myCore/afts?wt=standard&q=TYPE:
https://localhost:8443/solr/myCore/afts?wt=standard&q=
AFAIK, FieldValueCache is only used for faceting on tokenized fields.
Maybe, are you getting confused with FieldCache (
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_2/api/all/org/apache/lucene/search/FieldCache.html)?
This is used for common facets (using facet.method=fc and not tokenized
fields).
This makes
It seem you forget this
true
-Original Message-
From: Ruixiang Zhang
To: solr-user
Sent: Tue, Nov 22, 2011 11:54 am
Subject: spellcheck in dismax
I put the following into dismax requestHandler, but no suggestion field is
returned.
true
false
1
I put the following into dismax requestHandler, but no suggestion field is
returned.
true
false
1
spellcheck
But everything works if I put it as a separate requestHandler. Did I miss
something?
Thanks
Richard
: > q={!frange l=0 incl=false}query({!type=edismax qf="abstract^0.02
: > title^0.08 categorysearch^0.05" boost='eqsim(alltokens,"xyz")'
: > v='+tokens5:"xyz" '})
: >
: >
: > With the above query, I am getting only the results that I want, the ones
: > whose score after my FucntionQuery are above 0
I think you're using dismax, not edismax. edismax will take q=*:* just fine as
it handles all Lucene syntax queries also. dismax does not.
So, if you're using dismax and there is no actual query (but you want to get
facets), you set q.alt=*:* and omit q - that's entirely by design.
If there's
I'm trying to use multi-word synonyms. For example in my synonyms file I have
nhl, national hockey league. If I do this index only, a search for nhl returns
a correct match, but highlights the first word only, national. Ideally, it
would highlight national hockey league or not highlight at all.
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your suggestion.
My Exact scenario is that, I have one master core which has many underlying
shards core(Disturbed architecture). I want the terms.limit should be
defaulted to 10 in the underlying shards cores. When i hit the master core,
it will in-turn hit the underlying s
Hi Erick,
Thanks for your reply. I would know all the options that can be given under
the defaults section and how they can be overridden. is there any
documentation available in solr forum. Cos we tried searching and wasn't
able to succeed.
My Exact scenario is that, I have one master core whic
Seeing something odd going on with faceting . . . we execute facets with
every query and yet the fieldValueCache is not being used:
name: fieldValueCache
class: org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache
version: 1.0
description: Concurrent LRU Cache(maxSize=1, initial
Can this be fixed somehow? I also need the real score.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:44 AM, John wrote:
> After playing some more with this I managed to get what I want, almost.
>
> My query now looks like:
>
> q={!frange l=0 incl=false}query({!type=edismax qf="abstract^0.02
> title^0.08 categoryse
Thanks it works.
All this is based on the fact that NOW/DAY means the beginning of the day.
- Message d'origine -
De : sebastian.pet...@tib.uni-hannover.de
Envoyés : 22.11.11 16:46
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : AW: How to select all docs of 'today' ?
Hi, "fetch-time:[NOW/DAY
Hi Erik:
It's not in the SolrJ library, but rather my use of it:
In my application code:
protected static final String SOLR_ALL_DOCS_QUERY = "*:*";
/*
* If no search terms provided, then return all neighbors.
* Results are to be returned in neighbor symbol alphabetical order.
*/
if (search
Hi,
When doing a distributed query in solr 4.0 (4.0.0.2011.06.25.15.36.22) with
facet.missing=true and facet.limit=20 I get a NullPointerException. By
increasing the facet limit to 200 or setting facet missing to false it seems to
fix it. The shards both contain the field but one shard always h
Hi all,
I'm facing a real weird issue here with solr (lucene 3.3) and CentOS
5.7. I've two servers, one running CentOS 5.5 and the other running
CentOS 5.7. Both servers has the same solr, java and tomcat versions,
the only difference between them is OS version.
I added a custom field to schema.xm
You should try out the autocomplete component using Solr with
RankingAlgorithm. The performance is less than 3ms for a 1 million
Wikipedia titles index with very low deviation. You can get more information
about the performance with different indexes of size 3k, 390k, 1m, 10m docs
from here:
http
Hi,
"fetch-time:[NOW/DAY TO NOW]" should do it.
Best
Sebastian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Danicela nutch [mailto:danicela-nu...@mail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. November 2011 16:08
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: How to select all docs of 'today' ?
Hi,
I have a fetch-t
Thanks, Erick. I was in fact reading the patch (the one attached as a
file to the aforementioned jira) you updated sometime yesterday. I'll
watch the issue, but as said the change of a hard-coded boolean to its
opposite worked just fine for me.
Best,
Dmitry
On 11/22/11, Erick Erickson wrote:
>
No, no, no That's something buried in Lucene, it has nothing to
do with the patch! The patch has NOT yet been applied to any
released code.
You could pull the patch from the JIRA and apply it to trunk locally if
you wanted. But there's no patch for 3.x, I'll probably put that up
over the holid
Yu:
To get Near Real Time update in Solr 1.4.1 you will need to use Solr
1.4.1 with RankingAlgorithm. This allows you to update documents in near
real time. You can download and give this a try from here:
http://solr-ra.tgels.org/
Regards,
- Nagendra Nagarajayya
http://solr-ra.tgels.org/
ht
Hi,
I have a fetch-time (date) field to know when the documents were fetched.
I want to make a query to get all documents fetched today.
I tried :
fetch-time:NOW/DAY
but it returns always 0.
fetch-time:[NOW/DAY TO NOW/DAY]
(it returns 0)
fetch-time:[NOW/DAY-1DAY TO NOW/DAY]
but it ret
On Nov 22, 2011, at 09:55 , Jeff Schmidt wrote:
> When using [e]dismax, does configuring q.alt=*:* and not specifying q affect
> the performance/caching in any way?
No different than using q=*:* with the "lucene" query parser.
MatchAllDocsQuery is possibly the fastest query out there! (it sim
Hi Erik:
When using [e]dismax, does configuring q.alt=*:* and not specifying q affect
the performance/caching in any way?
As a side note, a while back I configured q.alt=*:*, and the application (via
SolrJ) still set q=*:* if no user input was provided (faceting). With both of
them set that wa
Hi, we currently have 2 servers running on JBoss container (master and slave)
with 20mln documents and about 3GB index size.
Java was executed with options:
*-Xms12G -Xmx12G -XX:NewSize=4G -XX:MaxNewSize=4G -XX:MaxPermSize=256m
-Dorg.jboss.resolver.warning=true -Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=36000
Why do you need spaces in the replacement?
Try pattern="\+" replacement="plus" - it will cause the transformed charstream
to contain as many tokens as the original and avoid the highlighting crash.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.sol
Hi,
Long shot: Try f.date.facet.range.gap=%2B1DAY instead, in case your "+" was
interpreted as space by your browser...
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
On 22. nov. 2011, at 12:57, do3do3 wrote:
> i try to use range
Congratulations!
Feel free to write a shorter version of the announcement text, suitable as a
news teaser on the Solr site, and we'll try to update the site with new thumb
and all.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
O
If all you're doing is filtering (browsing by facets perhaps), it's perfectly
fine to have q=*:*. MatchAllDocsQuery is fast (and would be cached anyway), so
use *:* as appropriate without worries.
Erik
On Nov 22, 2011, at 07:18 , pravesh wrote:
> Usually,
>
> Use the 'q' parameter
The "surround" query parser is fully wired into Solr trunk/4.0, if that helps.
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SurroundQueryParser and the JIRA issue linked
there in case you want to patch it into a different version.
Erik
On Jan 21, 2011, at 02:24 , Ahson Iqbal wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I
> do i need to install this seperately
> or it is integrated in solr 4.0 ?
You need to install SOLR-1604 separately. But this is easy since it is
implemented as a solr plugin.
> I have the solr-trunk , but queries
> are running on both (on trunk (4.0) and
> on (3.1) ) . then how i can be sure that what query will
> run by surround
> query parser plugin.
>
> The query i tried :
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=abstracts:99n(flat,panel,display)
>
> http://localhost:
Thanks Pravesh for your reply..
I definitely try this.. i hope it will improve solr response time.
pravesh wrote
>
> Usually,
>
> Use the 'q' parameter to search for the free text values entered by the
> users (where you might want to parse the query and/or apply
> boosting/phrase-sloppy, minim
Hi
We need to get minimum and maximum values for a field, within a group in
a grouped search-result. Is this possible today, perhaps by using
StatsComponent some way?
I'll flesh out the example a little, to make the question clearer.
We have a number of documents, indexed with a price, date
Hello!!!
I have a trouble with Solr highlighting. I have any document with next
fields- "TYPE", "DBID" and others. When i do next request -
https://localhost:8443/solr/myCore/afts?wt=standard&q=TYPE:
https://localhost:8443/solr/myCore/afts?wt=standard&q=TYPE:"cm:content"&indent=on&hl=true&hl.fl=
do i need to install this seperately or it is integrated in solr 4.0 ?
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> > Not sure about leading wildcard but you can use
> https://issues.apache.org for this.
>
> Sorry, link was : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1604
>
--
Tha
I have the solr-trunk , but queries are running on both (on trunk (4.0) and
on (3.1) ) . then how i can be sure that what query will run by surround
query parser plugin.
The query i tried :
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=abstracts:99n(flat,panel,display)
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=a
> I have done the following steps for
> installing surround plugin.
>
> 1. Downloading from
> http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/JKL/Downloadlucenesurround241jar.htm
> 2. Moved the
> lucene-surround-2.4.1.jar to
> /apache-solr-3.1.0/example/lib
> 3. restart solr .
>
> But How to be sure
> Not sure about leading wildcard but you can use https://issues.apache.org for
> this.
Sorry, link was : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1604
Usually,
Use the 'q' parameter to search for the free text values entered by the
users (where you might want to parse the query and/or apply
boosting/phrase-sloppy, minimum match,tie etc )
Use the 'fq' to limit the searches to certain criterias like location,
date-ranges etc.
Also, avoid using t
I have done the following steps for installing surround plugin.
1. Downloading from
http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/JKL/Downloadlucenesurround241jar.htm
2. Moved the lucene-surround-2.4.1.jar to /apache-solr-3.1.0/example/lib
3. restart solr .
But How to be sure that surround plugin i
> Have used Proximity Queries only work using a sloppy phrase
> query (e.g.:
> "catalyst polymer" ~5) but do not allow wildcards.
>
> Want to use Proximity Queries between any terms (e.g.:
> (poly* NEAR *lyst))
> is this possible using additional query parsers like
> "Surround"?
>
> if yes ,Pleas
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Rahul Mehta wrote:
> From: Rahul Mehta
> Subject: Integrating Surround Query Parser
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 8:05 AM
> Hello,
>
> I want to Run surround query .
>
>
> 1. Downloading from
> http://www.java2s.com/Code/Ja
i try to use range faceting in solr 3.1 using facet.range=date,
f.date.facet.range.gap=+1DAY, f.date.facet.range.start=NOW/DAY-5DAYS, and
f.date.facet.range.end=NOW/DAY
and i get this exception
Exception during facet.range of date org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
Can't add gap 1DAYS to value
I guess, I have found your comment, thanks.
For our current needs I have just set:
setLowercaseExpandedTerms(true); // changed from default false
in the SolrQueryParser's constructor and that seem to work so far.
In order not to start a separate thread on wildcards. Is it so, that for
the trail
Hi !I'm using solr 3.3 version and i have some pdf files which i want to
index. I followed instructions from the wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler
The problem is that i can add my documents to Solr but i cannot request
them. Here is what i have:
*solrconfig.xml*:
58 matches
Mail list logo