You're doing more commits than you need. You may want to turn off
autocommit since you are running commit yourself. Every commit causes
segment activity, so if you want to minimize that, you don't need
autocommit.
About memory sizing: you should drop the memory assigned to Solr until
it slows
I've been pestering you all with a series of questions about
disassembling and partially rescoring queries. Every helpful response
(thanks) has led me to further reading, and this leads to more
questions. If I haven't before, I'll apologize now for the high level
of ignorance at which I'm
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Rohit ro...@in-rev.com wrote:
The machine has a total ram of around 46GB. My Biggest concern is Solr index
time gradually increasing and then the commit stops because of timeouts, out
commit rate is very high, but I am not able to find the root cause of the
Why doesn't this example have to
use _val_? Is there an assumed defType of fund?
Yeah, that wiki page is misleading there, as it is implying a non-specified
defType=func. Wanna fix up the wiki to make this clear?
_val_ would work too, or of course using that function as a parameter to
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
Why doesn't this example have to
use _val_? Is there an assumed defType of fund?
Yeah, that wiki page is misleading there, as it is implying a non-specified
defType=func. Wanna fix up the wiki to make this clear?
_val_ would work too, or of course using that function as a parameter to
(e)dismay's bf, or dismay's boost params.
oops damn you autocorrect. I've been fighting this one since upgrading to
Lion and will turn it off. s/dismay/dismax/! :)
Erik
Since I ended up with 'fund' instead of 'func' we're even. I made the
edit. I'd make some more if you answered more of my questions :-)
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
_val_ would work too, or of course using that function as a parameter to
Mark, while thinking about it .. perhaps it'd would a good idea to compute the
needed information somewhere in a request-handler/servlet, so that not every
tool which shows the health needs to do that on their own?
On Sunday, April 15, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
Otis,
Is SMP a
This was done in SOLR-1301 going on several years ago now.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
It sounds like you really want the final map/reduce phase to put Solr
index files into HDFS. Solr has a feature to do this called 'Embedded
Solr'. This packages
So, I've been experimenting to learn how the _val_ participates in scores.
It seems to me that http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery should
explain the *effect* of including an _val_ term in an ordinary query,
starting with a constant.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I've been experimenting to learn how the _val_ participates in scores.
It seems to me that http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery should
explain the *effect* of including an _val_ term in an ordinary query,
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I've been experimenting to learn how the _val_ participates in scores.
It seems to me that
On Apr 15, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Stefan Matheis wrote:
Mark, while thinking about it .. perhaps it'd would a good idea to compute
the needed information somewhere in a request-handler/servlet, so that not
every tool which shows the health needs to do that on their own?
Yeah, I guess the hard
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
That's just because Lucene normalizes scores. By default, this is
really just multiplying scores by a magic constant (that by default is
the inverse of the sum of squared weights)
Sorry... I missed the square
You'll have to create a field per language...
The 3.6 example code has the fieldType
definitions for a lot of languages, that might
be a good place to start.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:32 PM, srinir sramasw...@nextag.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to pick different analyzers for the same
Faces are query-time construct, so you can
easily facet on the _values_ of fields
by specifying the field name in your query. See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
Best
Erick
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:06 AM, hadi md.anb...@gmail.com wrote:
hi
I am new to solr, I crawled
Please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
I have no clue what you mean by supported here.
Best
Erick
2012/4/14 Radim Kolar h...@filez.com:
is custom /org.apache.lucene.store.Directory ///supported in Solr? I want to
try infinispan.
//
Hi Erick,
Thanks a lot for your reply. I have around 10-15 searchable text fields (and
5-6 languages). If I create one per language will that increase the memory
occupied by my index. Even though only one field will have a value at a
time, will there be a case the empty fields in the index will
I took a quick look at Zabbix and specifically the lucid imagination
template for solr but in trying to import it into Zabbix I don't see
the template show up in the list to choose from. What version of
zabbix is recommended to use with LWE and specifically the provided
zabbix templates? I tried
I think I found the answer here
http://lucidworks.lucidimagination.com/display/lweug/Integrating+Monitoring+Services#IntegratingMonitoringServices-HowtointegratewithZabbix2.0%281.9.x%29
I'll go ahead and try on the 1.9 baseline and see if I have any
different result.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 3:46
Before you start worrying about memory, do you have any proof at all
that memory is a problem? Are you expecting to have a lot of documents
in your index (as in multiple tens of millions)?
If you try to put multiple languages in a single field, the results will be
problematic for some set
I think what Radim is referring to is can he use the Infinispan Lucene
Directory
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/ISPN/Infinispan+as+a+Directory+for+Lucene
in
Solr.
To do this Radim, I think you'll need to create an implementation of Solr's
DirectoryFactory that can load your Directory
Hello folks,
We are trying to access JMX data from SOLR 3.6 multi-core
setup and feed it into Nagios. Once we reload the core the JMX no more
works and we cannot get any data. Prior to moving to SOLR 3.6, I heard
that SOLR-2623 might have fixed the core reload issue. I reloaded one
of the
23 matches
Mail list logo
