Hi all,
i am experimenting with solr, and I feel the need to
index more than just one corpus and search them
with solr independently.
is it possible to have this setup?
Several independent indices all managed by the same solr instance?
cheers,
Giovanni
Hi all,
when querying my solr instance, the answers I get
are the document IDs of my docs. Here is how one of my docs
looks like:
-- -- 8 -- -- 8 -- -- 8 -- -- 8 -- -- 8 -- --
add
doc
field name=texthello solar!/field
field name=id123/field
/doc
/add
-- -- 8 -- -- 8 -- --
Hi all,
this morning I was very proud of myself since I managed
to set up solritas ( http://wiki.apache.org/solr/VelocityResponseWriter )
for the solr instance on my server (ubuntu natty).
This joy lasted only half a minute, since the only query
that gets more than zero results with solritas is
Hi,
did you include the fl parameter in the Solr query URL? If that's the case make
sure that the field name 'text' is mentioned there. You should also make sure
that the field definition (in schema.xml) for 'text' says stored=true,
otherwise the field will not be returned.
-Sascha
Hi,
Solritas uses the dismax query parser. The dismax config parameter 'qf'
specifies the index fields to be searched in. Make sure that 'name' is your
default search field.
-Sascha
Giovanni Gherdovich g.gherdov...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi all,
this morning I was very proud of myself since
Debugging this you can add debugQuery=truewt=xml to get the full classic Solr
XML output that drives it all.
Erik
On Jun 30, 2012, at 7:36, Giovanni Gherdovich g.gherdov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
this morning I was very proud of myself since I managed
to set up solritas (
Hello!
If you implement SolrCoreAware interface in your custom
UpdateRequestProcessorFactory, you could then access your cache via Solr
Core in the inform method, I think. Haven't tried it myself, but it looks
logical to me to start from there.
// Dmitry
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Iana
Hello Sascha,
Sascha:
Solritas uses the dismax query parser.
The dismax config parameter 'qf' specifies
the index fields to be searched in.
Make sure that 'name' is your default search field.
I am not sure I understand this; I have no field named 'name'.
My documents are like
-- -- 8 -- --
2012/6/30 Afroz Ahmad:
You can set up multiple cores, each core managing a different index.
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
thank you very much Ahmad for this hint.
cheers,
Giovanni
Don't try doing this with the text field of the Solr example schema, which
is a catchall field that is populated via CopyFields. Rather, add the
original source field(s) to fl that was/were copied to the catchall field.
The catchall field is designed for indexing, not result display. But do
2012/6/30 Erik Hatcher:
Debugging this you can add debugQuery=truewt=xml to get
the full classic Solr XML output that drives it all.
Thank you Erik, I'll see what I get from it.
cheers,
GGhh
Just use a simple Google search for any Solr question using specific
technical terms. Google will find the Solr archives as well as quite a few
discussions on StackOverflow.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Giovanni Gherdovich
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 5:39 AM
To:
Sascha:
You should also make sure that the field definition (in schema.xml) for 'text'
says stored=true, otherwise the field will not be returned.
I guess you're hitting my problem.
The field I want to search on is declared with store=false in
the schema.xml:
-- -- 8 -- -- 8 -- -- 8 -- -- 8
Hi all,
how do I trash a whole index and start over
with a new fresh index of my corpus?
I need that since I modified my schema.xml
since my last indexing, and I'd like the changes
to be taken into account.
Cheers,
Giovanni
Hey all,
Trying to figure out the best way to perform atomic operation across
multiple cores on the same solr instance i.e. a multi-core environment.
An example would be to move a set of docs from one core onto another core
and ensure that a softcommit is done as the exact same time. If one
Hi all,
in the example schema.xml I can find a wide variety
of fieldType and field, already there to be used.
I believe each of them has been designed for a specific
usage case, with some pragmatics in mind.
Where can I find documentation on what those field / fieldTypes
were designed for? Is
Hello,
The easiest way is to remove what's inside data/index directory; in case
you have a spell-checker index, remove it as well. This requires solr
instance restart.
Another way, without restarting the server, is to issue deleteByQuery over
http.
When you are done, you need to reindex your
Hi all,
when declaring a field in the schema.xml file you can
set the attributes 'indexed' and 'stored' to true or false.
What is the difference between a indexed=true stored=false
and a indexed=true stored=true?
I guess understanding this would require me to have
a closer look to lucene's
2012/6/30 Dmitry Kan:
Hello,
The easiest way is to remove what's inside data/index directory; in case
you have a spell-checker index, remove it as well. This requires solr
instance restart.
thanks dmitry, I'll go for this solution.
cheers,
GGhh
indexed and stored are independent, orthogonal attributes - you can use
any of the four combinations of true and false. indexed is used for search
or query, the lookup portion of processing a query request. Once the
search/query/lookup is complete and a set of documents is selected, stored
is
Giovanni
stored=true means the data is stored in the index and can be returned with
the search results (see the 'fl' parameter). This is independent of indexed=..
Which means that you can store but not index a field:
indexed=false stored=true
Best regards
François
On Jun 30,
On 30 June 2012 15:28, Giovanni Gherdovich g.gherdov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
i am experimenting with solr, and I feel the need to
index more than just one corpus and search them
with solr independently.
is it possible to have this setup?
Several independent indices all managed by the
Thank you François and Jack for those explainations.
Cheers,
GGhh
2012/6/30 François Schiettecatte:
Giovanni
stored=true means the data is stored in the index and [...]
2012/6/30 Jack Krupansky:
indexed and stored are independent [...]
Hi,
I really hate bothering this group with something that should be trivial,
but I've been googling and experimenting to get this to work for the last
week now. I had no trouble getting my simple configuration working on 3.5,
but when I moved over to 3.6, I seem to have hit something strange.
Hi Gora,
yes I was actually looking for a multi-core setup.
thanks!
GGhh
2012/6/30 Gora Mohanty
Not quite sure what you mean by more than one
corpus, and by several independent indices in
this context, but maybe multi-core Solr will meet
your needs: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
Index all documents to both cores, but do not call commit until both
report that indexing worked. If one of the cores throws an exception,
call roll back on both cores.
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Nicholas Ball
nicholas.b...@nodelay.com wrote:
Hey all,
Trying to figure out the best way
Try starting with the example/multicore directory. It shows how
solr.xml describes different available cores.
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Nabeel Sulieman
nabeel.sulie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I really hate bothering this group with something that should be trivial,
but I've been
What is the exception you're encountering? You might review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:48 PM, derohit mailrohi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am facing an ecpetion while trying to use dataImportHandler for Indexing
My solrcofig.xml
Lots of the index modification (all of it?) has been removed in 4.0
from IndexReaders...
It seems like you could always get the directory and open a
SolrIndexWriter wherever you wanted,
but I'm not sure it's a good idea, are there other processes that will
be writing to the index at the
same
This works fine for me with 3.6, float fields and even on a currency type.
I'm assuming a typo for 15.00.00 BTW.
I admit I'm not all that familiar with the currency type, which I infer you're
using given the USD bits. But I ran a quick test with currency types and
it worked at least the way I
for searching sub-strings, ngrams are generally preferred. To expand
on Jack's point.
The whole purpose behind reversed wildcards is that without them, searching for
*abcd requires that _every_ term in your field be enumerated, which can be very
expensive. Adding in reversed wildcards causes this
Your very best way of figuring this out is to use the admin/analysis
page. It will show
you the exact effects of each element of the analysis chains for the
field type you
specify. From there it's just a matter of getting your head around the fact that
the various filters and tokenizers can be
Hi Erik
The workflow I'd like to implement is
1- search the index using the incoming query
2- the query is of the type does entity X exist
3- if X does not exist in the index then I'd like to add X to the index
Currently I am using a custom search component to achieve this by creating a
33 matches
Mail list logo
