create an field for exact match. it is a optional boolean clause
在 2012-8-11 下午1:42,"abhayd" 写道:
> hi
>
> I have documents like
> iphone 4 - white
> iphone 4s - black
> ipone4 - black
>
> when user searches for iphone 4 i would like to show iphone 4 docs first
> and
> iphone 4s after that.
> Simil
hi
I have documents like
iphone 4 - white
iphone 4s - black
ipone4 - black
when user searches for iphone 4 i would like to show iphone 4 docs first and
iphone 4s after that.
Similary when user is searching for iphone 4s i would like to show iphone 4s
docs first then iphone 4 docs.
At present i
that helps
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/termFrequncy-off-and-still-use-fastvector-highlighter-tp3998590p4000575.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
In other computations I found exactly zero performance difference
between floats & doubles. Even with long arrays number which you would
expect to be sensitive to locality effects.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
wrote:
> Yeah it is... I rather like this write-up:
> ht
The beta appears imminent, unless somebody suggests that there are problems
with the current RC. You can try it here:
http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.0bRC0-rev1370099/solr/
The official Solr 4.0 wiki (a little outdated) is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr4.0
As
anyone has any clue when will the beta version of Solr 4.0 be released also
is their any timeframe when the first GA release for Solr4.0?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-0-schedule-tp4000561.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble
On Aug 10, 2012, at 3:05 PM, Nana wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for you answer.
> My Solr running under Tomcat, do you mean I have to restart Solr for
> updating?
>
> -Nader
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Jack Krupansky-2 [via Lucene] <
> ml-node+s472066n4000471...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
No, I meant that you must resend and new or changed documents to Solr, the
same way you sent documents to Solr initially.
Were scripts or shell/curl commands or data import handler (DIH) or custom
Java programs used for the initial load of data into Solr?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Mess
Hi
Thanks for you answer.
My Solr running under Tomcat, do you mean I have to restart Solr for
updating?
-Nader
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Jack Krupansky-2 [via Lucene] <
ml-node+s472066n4000471...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
> Solr itself doesn't crawl or re-crawl - you have to do that exter
hey guys, the spec mentions the following:
The unique
key field must be unique across all shards. If docs with
duplicate unique keys are encountered, Solr will make an attempt to return
valid results, but the behavior may be non-deterministic.
I'm actually looking to dupli
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:31 PM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
wrote:
> Is there any documentation on the updateLog transaction log feature in Solr
> 4?
Not much beyond what's in solrconfig.xml
> I started a quick prototype using Solr 4 alpha with a fairly structured
> schema; no big text. I disabl
Is there any documentation on the updateLog transaction log feature in Solr
4?
I started a quick prototype using Solr 4 alpha with a fairly structured
schema; no big text. I disabled auto-commit which came pre-enabled and
there's no soft-commit either. With CURL I posted a 1.8GB CSV file. AFter
Yeah it is... I rather like this write-up:
https://sites.google.com/site/trescopter/Home/concepts/required-precision-for-gps-calculations#TOC-Precision-of-Float-and-Double
-- which also arrives at 2.37m worse case.
Aside from RAM savings, I wonder if there is any noticeable performance
differenc
Hello Solr Experts,
Does anyone know how to active tabs (or scope bar) for the Solr search
mechanism within Drupal 7?
Thank you.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email constitutes an electronic communication
within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Priva
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:47 PM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
wrote:
> Information I've read vary on exactly what is the accuracy of float
> vs double but at a kilometer there's no question a double is overkill.
Back of the envelope:
23 mantissa bits + 1 implied bit == 24 effective mantissa bits in
Chris's response is quite good, and I have a couple things to add:
1. Since you can tolerate 1km slop, try defining the dynamic field
*_coordinate as tfloat instead of tdouble. This will halve your memory
requirements, but I'm not sure if it will be any faster -- it's worth a shot
since you've al
That column does not allow NULL. It's definitely an empty string, but I'm
using MySQL IF() to catch it and make sure it always has something.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Swati Swoboda wrote:
> Ah, my bad. I was incorrect - it was not actually indexing.
>
> @Jon - is there a possibility that
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Jason Axelson wrote:
> You're correct that there is an underlying problem I'm trying to
> solve. The underlying problem is that due to the security policies I
> cannot run another service that listens on a TCP port, but a unix
> domain socket would be okay. It look
"Doc1 has the pattern "AB%CD%" associated with it (somehow?!)."
You need to clarify what you mean by that.
To be clear, Solr support for wildcards is a superset of the SQL LIKE
operator, and the patterns used in the LIKE operator are NOT stored in the
table data, but used at query time - same
I remember I did set the 15sec autocommit and still saw the Tlogs growing
unboundedly. But sounds like theoretically it should not if I index in a
constant rate. I'll probably try it again sometime.
For the peersync, I think solr cloud now uses push-replication over pull.
Hmm, it makes sense to ke
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Bing Hua wrote:
> Thanks for the information. It definitely helps a lot. There're
> numDeletesToKeep = 1000; numRecordsToKeep = 100; in UpdateLog so this should
> probably be what you're referring to.
>
> However when I was doing indexing the total size of TLogs k
Thanks for the information. It definitely helps a lot. There're
numDeletesToKeep = 1000; numRecordsToKeep = 100; in UpdateLog so this should
probably be what you're referring to.
However when I was doing indexing the total size of TLogs kept on
increasing. It doesn't sound like the case where the
One simple example is in the testUpdateField method of:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/solrj/src/test/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/SolrExampleTests.java
It creates a HashMap with a "set" command, and then adds that Map as the
value for the field
HashMap oper = new HashM
> It seems more complicate than i
> need.
> I just want, if the user specify nothing, to search in all
> my fields that I declared in my schema.xml
> like that :
> article_nom
> but not only article_nom but all fields.
> There should be some simple way to do that without using all
> of this..?
> O
This may be your problem:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2894
-Original message-
> From:giovanni.bricc...@banzai.it
> Sent: Fri 10-Aug-2012 16:08
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: solrcloud and facet_pivot
>
> I'm moving my first steps with solr4 alpha and solr
I'm moving my first steps with solr4 alpha and solr cloud, and I'm
having troubles with the facet.pivot parameter.
starting solr cloudless I am able to use this parameter in some queries:
...facet.pivot=pidlevel_0,pidlevel_1,pidlevel_2,pidlevel_3
obtaining something like this
..."facet_pivot"
On 10 August 2012 14:35, Videnova, Svetlana
wrote:
>
> This is schema.xml
As requested, please also share the DIH configuration file,
data-config.xml.
Regards,
Gora
Either you need to use dismax/edismax or have a catch-all text field
and copyField directives that copy the contents of your other fields
into it, and make that the default search field.
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions | 18 East 41st St., Suite 1806
Solr itself doesn't crawl or re-crawl - you have to do that external to
Solr. How did you index the data originally? You simply need to perform
those steps again, hopefully via a script that can be re-executed to refresh
Solr whenever the external data has changed.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Orig
I'd recommend you ignore search speed for the time being.
First, your index isn't that large from what you've described.
I see clients witn 40-50M documents on a single machine
(admittedly with some iron under the hood)...
Instead, I'd concentrate on designing the best user
experience I could, and
Hi,
I am planning to use Field Collapsing/Grouping feature in Solr 3.6.1
version. I found the details regarding the same from the solr wiki page.
I have a doubt regarding the same i.e. can we change the way, the groups are
formed. If so can you please guide me on the same?
I have a scenario wh
It seems more complicate than i need.
I just want, if the user specify nothing, to search in all my fields that I
declared in my schema.xml
like that : article_nom but not only
article_nom but all fields.
There should be some simple way to do that without using all of this..?
Or am I wrong?
-
You probably want a mergepolicy, here's a good blog:
http://juanggrande.wordpress.com/2011/02/07/merge-policy-internals/
Best
Erick
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Bing Hua wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> With StandardDirectoryFactory, index is stored under data/index in forms of
> frq, tim, tip and a f
Thank you Toke, your comments made a lot of sense to me. Luckily we do not have
many patterns and we just decided to consider only the prefixes up to the first
wildcard. So we will no longer have to deal with patterns.
Alexander
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Toke Eskildsen [mailto:t...@
Thanks for wrapping that up.
Erick
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:52 PM, csscouter wrote:
> Erick,
>
> Thank you for the courtesy of your reply.
>
> I was able to figure out the problem, and for the benefit of the list, I
> list the analysis. Judging by the caliber of those on this list, this is
>
On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 10:07 +0200, Lochschmied, Alexander wrote:
> Coming from a SQL database based search system, we already have a set of
> defined patterns associated with our searchable documents.
>
> % matches no or any number of characters
> _ matches one character
>
> Example:
> Doc 1: 'A
I have OpenCMS on one of my server and use Solr for searching in index files.
Each night will OpenCMS-index files updated. But Solr stille use the old
index files. How can I configure Solr to become opdatet just shortly efter
index files are updated?
--
View this message in context:
http://luce
> So in the example I provided below, a user might enter "
> ABCDXYZ " and I need Solr to return Doc1, as Doc1 has the
> pattern "AB%CD%" associated with it (somehow?!).
OK understood now. You can use Lucene's MemoryIndex for this.
http://lucene.apache.org/core/3_6_1/api/contrib-memory/org/apache
> I couldn't find none tutorials who explain properly how to
> use dismix :s
> Can somebody please explain here, or maybe give to me better
> solution of my multisearching base problem?
http://searchhub.org/dev/2010/05/23/whats-a-dismax/
Plus example solrconfig.xml has an example. Search for keyw
You're correct that there is an underlying problem I'm trying to
solve. The underlying problem is that due to the security policies I
cannot run another service that listens on a TCP port, but a unix
domain socket would be okay. It looks like I might have to go with
mysql full-text search or someth
Currently I'm using this in order to search:
###
article_id
article_nom
###
But I wish be able to add more parameters in my defaultSearchField.
I saw in some forums that is not possible with defaultSearchField to do multi
requests and add parameters, but I can use dismax request.
I couldn't fin
I thought my question might be confusing...
I know about Solr providing wildcards in queries, but my problem is different.
I have those patterns associated with my searchable documents before any actual
search is done.
I need Solr to return the document which is associated with matching patterns
This is schema.xml
###
On 10.08.2012 04:42, Jason Axelson wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the information. Unfortunately I'm having a hard time
finding any servlet containers that can serve over a unix domain
socket. Also it looks like EmbeddedSolr won't work since I am not
writing the application in Java (it's in Ruby
On 10 August 2012 14:09, Videnova, Svetlana
wrote:
> Hi everybody, someone can help me please with this:
>
>
>
> I have a problem to index the part named "contenusection".
>
>
> -Data-config.xml :
>
>
> Section.id Is ok =>
It is a little difficult to understand what you are saying (please
shar
Hi everybody, someone can help me please with this:
I have a problem to index the part named "contenusection".
-Data-config.xml :
Section.id Is ok =>
-Schema.xml
In the Schema browser section_id is filled, but after reindexation which is
completed, but there is nothing in contenusect
--- On Fri, 8/10/12, Lochschmied, Alexander
wrote:
> From: Lochschmied, Alexander
> Subject: Indexing wildcard patterns
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Date: Friday, August 10, 2012, 11:07 AM
> Coming from a SQL database based
> search system, we already have a set of defined patterns
Coming from a SQL database based search system, we already have a set of
defined patterns associated with our searchable documents.
% matches no or any number of characters
_ matches one character
Example:
Doc 1: 'AB%CD', 'AB%CD%'
Doc 2: 'AB_CD'
...
Thus Doc 1 matches
ABXYZCD
ABCD
ABCDXYZ
...
49 matches
Mail list logo