Hi guys,
we are using SOLR 3.3 with Solrj inside our java project. In actual
version we had to add some grouping support, so we add parameters into
SolrQuery object like this:
query.setParam(GroupParams.GROUP, true);
query.setParam(GroupParams.GROUP_MAIN, true);
query.
Hey,
Please disregard this, I worked out what the actual problem was. I
am going to post another query with something else I discovered.
Thanks :)
David
On 22/08/2012 7:24 PM, David Radunz wrote:
Hey,
I have been having some problems getting good search results when
using weightin
Thanks for the reply Mikhail.
For our needs the speed is more important than flexibility and we have huge
text files (ex: blogs / articles ~2 MB size) that needs to be read from our
filesystem and then store into the index.
We have our app creating separate core per client (dynamically) and there
Yes, distributed grouping works, but grouping takes a lot of
resources. If you can avoid in distributed mode, so much the better.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Tom Burton-West wrote:
> Thanks Tirthankar,
>
> So the issue in memory use for sorting. I'm not sure I understand how
> sorting of gr
Thanks Erick.
I tried to do it all at the filter but the problem i am running into doing
it at the filter is intercepting the final commit calls or in other words I
am unable to figure out when the final commit should happen such that I
don't miss out any data.
One option I tried is to increase the
What container are you using?
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 22, 2012, at 3:14 PM, "Buttler, David" wrote:
> Hi,
> I have set up a Solr 4 beta cloud cluster. I have uploaded a config
> directory, and linked it with a configuration name.
>
> I have started two solr on two computers and added a co
Yeah - we want fix that for sure.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 22, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would think so. Perhaps something for:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3288
>
>
> -Original message-
>> From:Tom Burton-West
>> Sent: Wed 22-Aug-2012 22
Thanks Tirthankar,
So the issue in memory use for sorting. I'm not sure I understand how
sorting of grouping fields is involved with the defaults and field
collapsing, since the default sorts by relevance not grouping field. On
the other hand I don't know much about how field collapsing is impl
Hi,
I would think so. Perhaps something for:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3288
-Original message-
> From:Tom Burton-West
> Sent: Wed 22-Aug-2012 22:35
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr 4.0 Beta missing example/conf files?
>
> Thanks Markus!
>
> Shou
Ok, I'll take your suggestion, but I would still be really happy if the
wildcard searches behaved a little more intelligent (body:* not looking for
everything in the body). More like when you do "q=*:*" it doesn't really
search for everything in every field.
Thanks
--
View this message in conte
Thanks Markus!
Should the README.txt file in solr/example be updated to reflect this?
Is that something I need to enter a JIRA issue for?
Tom
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hi - The example has been moved to collection1/
>
>
>
> -Original message-
> > From:Tom B
Thanks Jack, I'll give that version of SOLR a try.
Vincent Vu Nguyen
Web Applications Developer
Division of Science Quality and Translation
Office of the Associate Director for Science
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
404-498-0384 v...@cdc.gov
Century Bldg 2400
Atlanta, GA 30329
I've indexed Office 2007 .docx using Solr 3.6.
It sounds as if Solr 1.3 had an old release of Tika/POI. No big surprise
there.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Nguyen, Vincent (CDC/OD/OADS) (CTR)
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 3:57 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subj
solrconfig.xml has a setting ramBufferSizeMB that can be set
to limit the memory consumed during indexing. When this limit
is reached, the buffers are flushed to the current segment. NOTE:
the segment is NOT closed, there is no implied commit here, and
the data will not be searchable until a commit
Has anyone been able to index DOCX files? I get this error message when using
office 2007 documents
(Location of error
unknown)org.apache.poi.poifs.filesystem.OfficeXmlFileException: The supplied
data appears to be in the Office 2007+ XML. POI only supports OLE2 Office
documents
We're curren
Hi,
I have set up a Solr 4 beta cloud cluster. I have uploaded a config directory,
and linked it with a configuration name.
I have started two solr on two computers and added a couple of shards using the
Core Admin function on the admin page.
When I go to the admin cloud view, the shards all h
Hi - The example has been moved to collection1/
-Original message-
> From:Tom Burton-West
> Sent: Wed 22-Aug-2012 20:59
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Solr 4.0 Beta missing example/conf files?
>
> Hello,
>
> Usually in the example/solr file in Solr distributions there
Hello,
Usually in the example/solr file in Solr distributions there is a populated
conf file. However in the distribution I downloaded of solr 4.0.0-BETA,
there is no /conf directory. Has this been moved somewhere?
Tom
ls -l apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA/example/solr
total 107
drwxr-sr-x 2 tburtonw
Hi Lance and Tirthankar,
We are currently using Solr 3.6. I tried a search across our current 12
shards grouping by book id (record_no in our schema) and it seems to work
fine (the query with the actual urls for the shards changed is appended
below.)
I then searched for the record_no of the seco
I'm reaching a bit here, haven't implemented one myself, but...
It seems like you're just dealing with some shared memory. So say
your filter recorded all the stuff you want to put into the DB. When
you put stuff in to the shared memory, you probably have to figure
out when you should commit the b
Hi,
checkout : https://github.com/geek4377/jetty-solr
you can remove exampledocs from the list to get only the required dirs for
running solr.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Alexander Cougarman wrote:
> Hi. Which folders/files can be deleted from the default Solr package
> (apache-solr-3.6.1
Why do you care? I suspect that the example directory can be removed
assuming you're distributing the war file. But disk space is really cheap,
I suspect that tidying up the directories for aesthetic reasons isn't worth
the risk of removing something that you might need later...
Best
Erick
On Wed
Jack, sorry to forgot to answer you, we tried "[* TO *]" and the response
times are the same as doing plain "*"
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-3-6-1-query-performance-is-slow-when-asterisk-is-in-the-query-tp4002496p4002708.html
Sent from the Solr - User
Don't have an immediate answer for you on #1, but for #2, "mm" does not
override explicit operators - "and" - it only applies to terms that are not
the immediate operand of an explicit operator. Note that by default
lower-case operators are enabled in edismax - "and" is treated as "AND" -
you c
You could also add a bodySize numeric (trie) field, which you can check for
0 for empty/missing bodies.
And don't forget to check and see whether the "[* TO *]" range query might
be faster.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: david3s
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 12:37 PM
Hi,
I ran into an issue lately with Index version & generation for Solr 3.5.
In Solr 1.4., the index version of slave service increments upon each
replication. However, I noticed it's not the case for Solr 3.5; the
index version would increase 20, or 30 after replication. Does anyone
know why and
The name of the game for performance and functionality in Solr quite
often *denormalization*, which might run against your RDBMS instincts,
but once you embrace it, you'll find that things go a lot more
smoothly.
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions | 18
> Does anyone have the grammar file (.jj
> file) for the complex phrase query
> parser. The patch from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1604 does
> not have the grammar file as part of it.
It does not have a separate grammar file. It just extends QueryPaser.
Hello Chris, thanks a lot for your reply. But is there an alternative
solution? Because I see adding "has_body" as data duplication.
Imagine in that in a Relational DB you had to create extra columns because
you can't do something like "where body is not null"
If there's no other alternative I'll
Check your cores' "status" page and see if you're running the
MMapDirectory (you probably are.)
In that case, you probably want to devote even less RAM to Tomcat's
heap because the index files are being read out of memory-mapped pages
that don't reside on the heap, so you'd be devoting more memory
Just to clarify that query-side joins ( e.g. {!join from=id
to=parent_signal_id_s}id:foo ) do not work in a distributed mode yet?
I saw LUCENE-3759 as unresolved but also some some Twitter traffic
saying there was a patch available.
Cheers,
Tim
Commercial solutions often have %age that is meant to signify the quality
of match. Solr has relative score and you cannot tell by just looking at
this value if a result is relevant enough to be in first page or not.
Score depends on "what else is in the index" so not easy to normalize in
the way
Le 22/08/2012 16:57, Bruno Mannina a écrit :
Dear users,
I try to know if my add in the setenv.sh (which I need to create
because it didn't exist) file has been set but when I click on the
link Java Properties on Admin Solr web page
I can't see the variable CATALINA_OPTS.
In fact, I would li
Hi Tirthankar,
Can you give me a quick summary of what won't work and why?
I couldn't figure it out from looking at your thread. You seem to have a
different issue, but maybe I'm missing something here.
Tom
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Tirthankar Chatterjee <
tchatter...@commvault.com> wr
Hi Lance,
I don't understand enough of how the field collapsing is implemented, but I
thought it worked with distributed search. Are you saying it only works if
everything that needs collapsing is on the same shard?
Tom
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> How do you separa
This is really nice. Thanks for pointing it out.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 8:23 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Co-existing solr cloud installations
You can use a connect string of host:port/pa
Hi,
I think that this totally depends on your requirements and thus applicable
for a user scenario. Score does not have any absolute meaning, it is always
relative to the query. If you want to watch some particular queries and want
to show results with score above previously set threshold, you can
It's not great to leak internal implementation details of your
application out like this, and it may be that someone more skilled at
exploiting things like this could find one.
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions | 18 East 41st St., Suite 1806 | New York
Dear users,
I try to know if my add in the setenv.sh (which I need to create because
it didn't exist) file has been set but when I click on the link Java
Properties on Admin Solr web page
I can't see the variable CATALINA_OPTS.
In fact, I would like to know if my line added in the file setenv
This is string fieldType:
These are the filelds using 'string' fieldType:
And this the sample query:
/select/?q=url:http\://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2012/08/10/social-change-coming-from-gas-prices-to-rent-prices-and-beyond/
AND image_url:*
Each query like this taking aro
I haven't spent time in trying anything, just entered a query and recognized
that it showed up in the page source view.
If they really escape everything it is not that dangerous?
Actually I don't want to try anything with their page,
they might not have any humor ;-)
Bernd
Am 22.08.2012 15:41,
Did you see my message about debugging parameters? Try that and see what's
happening behind the scenes.
I can confirm that by default the queries are NOT case sensitive.
Ravish
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:45 PM, meghana wrote:
> Hi Ravish , the defination for text_en_splitting in solr default s
Hi,
I tried to start the solr-4.0.0-BETA with tomcat-6.0.20 but does not work.
I copied the apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA.war to $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps. Then I copied
the directory apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA\example\solr to C:\home\solr-4.0-beta and
adjusted the file
$TOMCAT_HOME\conf\Catalina\localhost\apa
Hi Ravish , the defination for text_en_splitting in solr default schema and
of mine are same.. still its not working... any idea?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-case-insensitive-search-do-not-work-tp4002605p4002645.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailin
Actually, I'm having a little trouble coming up with a
proof-of-concept exploit for this... it doesn't seem like Solr is
exposed directly, and it does seem like it's escaping submitted
content before redisplaying it on the page.
I'm not crazy about leaking the raw query string into the HTML, but i
Ouch, not to mention the potential for XSS.
I'll see if I can get in touch with someone.
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions | 18 East 41st St., Suite 1806 | New York, NY 10017
www.appinions.com
Where Influence Isn’t a Game
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:4
Hi,
Just few things to add up, I found that when we search for less than or
equal to 3 letters I'm not able to get any suggestions and also when I
search for "finding", I dont get any suggestions related to it even though i
have search results regarding the same.
But when i Search for "findingg"
You can collapse in each Shards as a separate query
Lance Norskog wrote:
How do you separate the documents among the shards? Can you set up the
shards such that one "collapse group" is only on a single shard? That
you never have to do distributed grouping?
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:10 PM,
Hi I am experiencing 2 strange behavior in edismax:
edismax is configured to behave default OR (using mm=0)
Total there are 700 results
1. Search for *auto* = *50 results*
Search for *NOT auto* it gives *651 results*.
Mathematically, it should give only 650 results for *NOT auto*.
2. Search f
Also, try comparing your field configuration to Solrs default text field
and see if you can spot any differences.
Ravish
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Ravish Bhagdev wrote:
> OK. Try without quotes like myfield:cloud+university and see if it has
> any effect.
>
> Also, try both queries with
OK. Try without quotes like myfield:cloud+university and see if it has any
effect.
Also, try both queries with debugging turned on and post the output of the
same ( http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#Debugging )
It must be some field configuration issue or that double quotes are c
Could it be different 'current' working directories? What happens if
you hardcode the full path into the command and input/output files?
./convert.bin -> /Dev/Solr/bin/convert.bin, etc.
Also, you may want to use some file system observation tools to figure
out exactly what file is touched where.
I have following code on my Apache Tika Maven project.
This code works when I test locally, but fails when it's attached as
external jar in Apache Solr (container is Tomcat).
String cmd; contains command string that will convert file with input as
./convert.bin input.custom output.xml
I checked
Thanks, I will look into autoCommit.
I assume there are memory implications of not committing? Or is it
just writing in a separate file and can theoretically do it
indefinitely?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovit
@Ravish Bhagdev , Yes I am adding double quotes around my search , as shown
in my post. Like,
myfield:"cloud university"
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-case-insensitive-search-do-not-work-tp4002605p4002610.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
is already present in your
field type definition (its twice now)
Are you adding quotes around your query by any chance?
Ravish
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:31 AM, meghana wrote:
> I want to apply case-insensitive search for field *myfield* in solr.
>
> I googled a bit for that , and i found tha
I want to apply case-insensitive search for field *myfield* in solr.
I googled a bit for that , and i found that , i need to apply
*LowerCaseFilterFactory *to Field Type and field should be of
solr.TextFeild.
I applied that in my *schema.xml* and re-index the data, then also my search
seems to be
Hey,
I have been having some problems getting good search results when
using weighting against many fields with multi-values. After quite a bit
of testing it seems to me that the problem is (at least as far as my
query is concerned) is that the only one weighting is taken into account
per
Thanks for your reply,
I had tryied many things (copy field etc) with no succes. Notice that the
"pdfs" are stored as BLOB in mysql database. I am trying to use DIH in order
to fetch the binaries from DB. Is it possible?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.co
You can include one xml file into another, something like
1.
2. ]>
4.
5. &resourcedb;
6.
- Ravish
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Alexander Cougarman wrote:
> Thanks, Lance. Please forgive my ignorance, but what do you mean by soft
> links/XML include feature? Can you prov
Thanks, Lance. Please forgive my ignorance, but what do you mean by soft
links/XML include feature? Can you provide an example? Thanks again.
Sincerely,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Lance Norskog [mailto:goks...@gmail.com]
Sent: 22 August 2012 9:55 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
S
Now this is very scary, while searching for "solr direct access per docid" I
got a hit
from US Homeland Security Digital Library. Interested in what they have to tell
me
about my search I clicked on the link to the page. First the page had nothing
unusual
about it, but why I get the hit?
http://
when i search with "abc cde", solr will return result but highlighting
portion is as per below,
and when i search with "ABC cde" it will have below response
... ... ABC cde .
seems highlighting returns response is case sensitive.
in above both case other query parameters a
Hi. Which folders/files can be deleted from the default Solr package
(apache-solr-3.6.1.zip) on Windows if all we'd like to do is index/store
documents? Thanks.
Sincerely,
Alex
Hi,
Im using Solr 1.4.0 version and tried to use spellcheck component by doing
the following changes in solrconfig.xml
solr.IndexBasedSpellChecker
./spellchekerFile1
spell
true
and included the below in the standard request handler to enable spell check
65 matches
Mail list logo
