You can use PowerShell in windows to kick off a URL at a scheduled time.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:02 PM, harshrossi harshro...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using *DeltaImportHandler* for indexing data in Solr. Currently I am
manually indexing the data into Solr by selecting commands full-import
Thanks! So solr 4.7 does not seem to respect the luceneMatchVersion on the
binary (index) level. Or perhaps, I misunderstand the meaning of the
luceneMatchVersion.
This is what I see when loading index from hdfs via luke and launching the
Index Checker tool:
[clip]
Segments file=segments_2
Can you try this
bin/nutch solrindex http://127.0.0.1:8080/solr/ crawl/crawldb -linkdb
crawl/linkdb crawl/segments/*
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-Integrating-solr-4-7-1-with-apache-nutch-1-8-tp4130149p4130569.html
Sent from the Solr - User
Hi Xavier;
I think that it is better to ask this question at Nutch user list.
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
2014-04-11 7:52 GMT+03:00 Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com:
Does your Solr schema match the data output by nutch? It's up to you to
create a Solr schema that matches the output of nutch
On 4/11/2014 12:42 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
Thanks! So solr 4.7 does not seem to respect the luceneMatchVersion on the
binary (index) level. Or perhaps, I misunderstand the meaning of the
luceneMatchVersion.
luceneMatchVersion does not dictate the index format. It is a way to
signal things like
Thanks Shawn,
perhaps the comment on the luceneMatchVersion in the example schema.xml
could be changed to reflect / clarify this?
!-- Controls what version of Lucene various components of Solr
adhere to. Generally, you want to use the latest version to
get all bug fixes and
Erick Erickson wrote
So you're saying that you have B_1 - B_8 in one doc, B_9 - B_16 in
another doc etc?
Well yes that could work, but this would mean we get a lot of unique dymanic
fields, basically equal to the number of documents in our system and I am
not sure if that is a good practice.
Hello Doug
I have just watched the quepid demonstration video, and I strongly agree
with your introduction: it is very hard to involve marketing/business
people in repeated testing session, and speadsheets or other kind of files
are not the right tool to use.
Currenlty I'm quite alone in my
Hello,
I am facing the same issue discussed at SOLR-4852. I am getting below error:
Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class
org.apache.lucene.analysis.icu.ICUFoldingFilter
at
i am using solr 4.3.1 and want to highlight complete sentences if possible or
at least not cut up words. it it finds something the hole field is displayed
instead of only 180 chars
the field is:
fieldType name=text_de class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100
field name=plain_text
Hi,
I built an Apache SOLR cloud (version 4.7.0) with 3 shards. I chose
implicit routing mechanism while creating new collection (one shard per
month, fields with date format MM use as shardId). I configured
DataImportHandler with database as a data source.
Finally I run full-import
Thanks, that was helpful.
Regards,Rohit
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 08:44:36 -0700
From: iori...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Fails to index if unique field has special characters
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi Ayush,
I thinks this
IBM!12345. The exclamation mark ('!') is critical here, as
Well, this is somewhat of a problem if you have have URL's as uniqueKey that
contain exclamation marks. Isn't it an idea to allow those to be escaped and
thus ignored by CompositeIdRouter?
On Friday, April 11, 2014 11:43:31 AM Cool Techi wrote:
Thanks, that was helpful.
Regards,Rohit
Yes that is all fine with me. Only thing that worries me is what needs to be
coded in the batch file.
I will just try a sample batch file and get back with queries if any.
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
I realized what the problem was. One of the Solr threads freezes when importing
MP3 files. When there are many such files Solr loads all processors. Is there a
way to free thread?
Re: High CPU usage after import That could mean that the code is hung somehow.
Or, maybe Solr is just
working on the
I just wanted to let people know about some recent Solr books and videos
that are now available at safariflow.com. You can sign up for a free
trial and get instant access, buy a subscription, or you may already be
a subscriber. I don't normally send out announcements like this, but
because
When I search for a list of words, per default Solr uses the OR operator.
In my case I index (pdfs) files. How/what can I do so that when I search the
index for a list of words, I get the list of documents ordered first by the
ones that have all the words in them?
Thank you
Francesco
Thanks to both of you. I finally found the issue and you were right (again) ;)
The problem was not coming from the full indexation code containing the SQL
replace statement but from another process whose job is to maintain our index
up to date. This process had no idea that commas were to be
Sorry - yes, I meant to say leader.
Each JVM has 16G of memory.
On 10 April 2014 20:54, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
First, there is no master node, just leaders and replicas. But that's a
nit.
No real clue why you would be going out of memory. Deleting a
document, even by
On 4/11/2014 3:44 AM, ronak kirit wrote:
I am facing the same issue discussed at SOLR-4852. I am getting below error:
Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class
org.apache.lucene.analysis.icu.ICUFoldingFilter
at
Hi,
my solr (v. 4.5) after moths of work suddenly stopped to index: it responded
at the query but didn't index anymore new data. Here the error message:
ERROR - 2014-04-11 15:52:30.317; org.apache.solr.common.SolrException;
java.lang.IllegalStateException: this writer hit an OutOfMemoryError;
Generally, the documents containing more of the terms should score higher
and be returned first, but relevancy for some terms can skew that
ordering, to some degree. What specific use cases are failing for you?
You can always add an additional optional subquery which is the AND of all
terms
Hello!
Do you have warming queries defined?
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
Hi,
my solr (v. 4.5) after moths of work suddenly stopped to index: it responded
at the query but didn't index
HI thanks Aman/Eric,
I move part of the query under q=*:* and there is a difference in the score and
the Order. It seems work for me now. I use this and move forward
Thanks
Ravi
-Original Message-
From: Aman Tandon [mailto:amantandon...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 12:02
Any help on this is much appreciated. I cannot find any documentation
around this and would be good to understand what this means
Thanks
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Chris W chris1980@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there
I am using solrcloud (4.3). I am trying to get the status of a core
On 4/10/2014 2:50 PM, Chris W wrote:
Hi there
I am using solrcloud (4.3). I am trying to get the status of a core from
solr using (localhost:8000/solr/admin/cores?action=STATUScore=core) and
i get the following output
int name=numDocs100/int
int name=maxDoc102/int
int name=deletedDocs2/int
Are you storing the data? That is, the raw binary of the MP3? B/c when
stored=true, Solr will try to compress the data, perhaps that's
what's driving the CPU utilization?
Easy test: set stored=false for everything..
FWIW,
Erick
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Александр Вандышев
Using 16G for a 360G index is probably pushing things. A lot. I'm
actually a bit surprised that the problem only occurs when you delete
docs
The simplest thing would be to increase the JVM memory. You should be
looking at your index to see how big it is, be sure to subtract out
the *.fdt and
My assumption is that you've been adding documents and just have
finally run out of space
Is that true
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Rafał Kuć r@solr.pl wrote:
Hello!
Do you have warming queries defined?
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Performance Monitoring * Log
This is lucene_solr_4_7_2_r1586229, downloaded from the release
manager's staging area.
I configured the following in my log4j.properties file:
log4j.rootLogger=WARN, file
log4j.category.org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore=INFO, file
Now EVERYTHING that SolrCore logs (which is all at INFO) is being
Thanks, Shawn.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 4/10/2014 2:50 PM, Chris W wrote:
Hi there
I am using solrcloud (4.3). I am trying to get the status of a core
from
solr using (localhost:8000/solr/admin/cores?action=STATUScore=core)
and
i get
Tried to increase the memory to 24G but that wasn't enough as well.
Agree that the index has now grown too much and had to monitor this and
take action much earlier.
The search operations seem to run ok with 16G - mainly because the bulk of
the data that we are trying to delete is not getting
On 4/10/2014 7:25 PM, Vinay Pothnis wrote:
When we tried to delete the data through a query - say 1 day/month's worth
of data. But after deleting just 1 month's worth of data, the master node
is going out of memory - heap space.
Wondering is there any way to incrementally delete the data
The query is something like this:
*curl -H 'Content-Type: text/xml' --data 'deletequeryparam1:(val1 OR
val2) AND -param2:(val3 OR val4) AND date_param:[138395520 TO
138516480]/query/delete'
'http://host:port/solr/coll-name1/update?commit=true'*
Trying to restrict the number of documents
Looks nice. Would love to see the author-side usage/statistics too. To know
which chapters of my book were most useful/recommended.
Regards,
Alex
On 11/04/2014 8:45 pm, Michael Sokolov msoko...@safaribooksonline.com
wrote:
I just wanted to let people know about some recent Solr books and
Vinay please share your experience after trying this solution.
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Vinay Pothnis poth...@gmail.com wrote:
The query is something like this:
*curl -H 'Content-Type: text/xml' --data 'deletequeryparam1:(val1 OR
val2) AND -param2:(val3 OR val4) AND
36 matches
Mail list logo
