Erick Erickson wrote > So you're saying that you have B_1 - B_8 in one doc, B_9 - B_16 in > another doc etc?
Well yes that could work, but this would mean we get a lot of unique dymanic fields, basically equal to the number of documents in our system and I am not sure if that is a good practice. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Shared-Stored-Field-tp4130351p4130589.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
