I see. Thank you! :-)
Sent from my Android phone
On Nov 3, 2014 9:35 PM, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
> Yep. It's almost always easier and faster if you can pre-compute as
> much as possible during indexing time. It'll take longer to index of
> course, but the ratio of writing to the index to searc
On 11/3/2014 12:45 PM, maninder batth wrote:
> Thank you for recommendation on composite IDs. We currently use solr 3.x.
> After reading on composite ids, it sounds like a feature of solr 4.x. Is
> something similar available in solr 3.x also? Also, we do not use solrCloud.
The compositeId router
Hello,
I just noticed this one and curious what's causing this (desirable I
guess) behavior.
I have a chain with ReverseStringFilterFactory in it (both index and
query). So, the tokens are reversed from the input.
But when I look at the Schema Browser screen and it loads the tokens,
it seems to
Yep. It's almost always easier and faster if you can pre-compute as
much as possible during indexing time. It'll take longer to index of
course, but the ratio of writing to the index to searching is usually
hugely in favor of doing the work during indexing.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:
On 11/1/2014 11:45 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> There appear to be large blocks of time missing in my solr logfiles
> created with slf4j->log4j and rotated using the log4j config:
>
> End of solr.log.1: INFO - 2014-10-31 12:52:25.073;
> Start of solr.log: INFO - 2014-11-01 02:27:27.404;
>
> End of
Hi Erik,
Thanks for the reply! Do you mean parse and modify the documents before
sending them to Solr?
Cheers,
Yubing
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Wouldn't it be easiest to compute the span at index time? Then it's
> very straight-forward.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Mo
Wouldn't it be easiest to compute the span at index time? Then it's
very straight-forward.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Yubing (Tom) Dong 董玉冰
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to Solr, and I'm having a problem with faceting. I would really
> appreciate it if you could help :)
>
> I have a
Hi,
I'm new to Solr, and I'm having a problem with faceting. I would really
appreciate it if you could help :)
I have a set of documents in JSON format, which I could post to my Solr
core using the post.jar tool. Each document contains two fields, namely
"startDate" and "endDate", both of which a
Hi Alexandre,
OK some good progress was made based on this advice. Thanks! I think we're
in the home stretch with the data import. Not there yet. But hopefully
close.
> Two problems:
> 1) You have (span) elements in your solrconfig.xml. They just
> do not belong there. The original tutorial sc
So I jumped back on this.
I have not been using the optimize option on this new set of tests.
If I run the full index on the leader I seem to get all of the items in the
database minus 3 that have a missing field.
Indexing completed. Added/Updated: 903,990 documents. Deleted 0 documents.
(Durat
You have a TB-scale index and you're not using SolrCloud? Are
you using master/slave or otherwise splitting up your index? Because
if you're not, then please ship me some of your hardware because it
must be awesome.
Which is a tongue-in-cheek way of saying there must be lots of details
you aren't
bq: Do you think it would be possible to add an abstraction layer to
Solr source code in near future?
I strongly doubt it. As you've already noted, this is a large amount
of work. Without some super-compelling advantage I just don't see the
interest.
bq: to avoid deploying ZK just for SolrCloud
Hello,
We need to order solr search results according to specific rules.
I will explain with an example. Let say solr returns 1000 results for query
"sport".
These results must be divided into three buckets according to rules that come
from database.
Then one doc must be chosen from each b
: I am currently working on SolrCloud and its related security
: configurations for securing Solr web applications using HTTP Basic
: Authentication mechanism. Among the Solr nodes inside the SolrCloud
: clustered env, there seem to be existing some inter-solr-node
: communication issues due t
You find the answer to such questions by looking at the state of the JIRA issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4470
Staus: Open
Fix version: Trunk
Which means that this feature is not included in any released Solr version
(yet).
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS
I am currently working on SolrCloud and its related security configurations for
securing Solr web applications using HTTP Basic Authentication mechanism. Among
the Solr nodes inside the SolrCloud clustered env, there seem to be existing
some inter-solr-node communication issues due to the securi
Thank you for recommendation on composite IDs. We currently use solr 3.x.
After reading on composite ids, it sounds like a feature of solr 4.x. Is
something similar available in solr 3.x also? Also, we do not use solrCloud.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmai
It is of type string.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Ramzi Alqrainy
wrote:
> I tried to produce your case in my machine with below queries, but
> everything
> worked fine with me. I just want to ask you a question what is the field
> type of "tag" field ?
>
> q=bmw&
> fl=score,*&
> wt=json&
> f
I tried to produce your case in my machine with below queries, but everything
worked fine with me. I just want to ask you a question what is the field
type of "tag" field ?
q=bmw&
fl=score,*&
wt=json&
fq=city_id:59&
qt=/query&
defType=edismax&
pf=title^15%20discription^5&
pf3=1&
pf2=1&
ps=1&
qroup
Thanks Erick,
after looking further into Solr's source code, I see that it's married to ZK
libraries and it won't be possible to extend existing code without diverting
from the trunk. At the same time, I don't see any reason for lack of
abstraction in cloud-related code of Solr and SolrJ. As fa
That was a typo in the email I did not actually send the query with a start
param of 50. I sent it with a start param of 0, I just verified. Sorry
for the mistake.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Ramzi Alqrainy
wrote:
> The results are different, because you need to set "start" parameter 0
> i
Two problems:
1) You have (span) elements in your solrconfig.xml. They just
do not belong there. The original tutorial screwed up. Your element
should be on the same level as the other elements in that example.
2) You also seem to have another random piece of data configuration in
the solrconfig.x
The results are different, because you need to set "start" parameter 0
instead of 50 in the first query (after filtration ) with same rows value
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Cannot-use-Phrase-Queries-in-eDisMax-and-filtering-tp4167302p4167329.html
Sent fr
Hi Alexandre,
Thanks so much for your input and examples! Ok so here's what I've done so
far with no luck as of yet unfortunately.
Inside of solrconfig.xml I put the following:
**
As you can see, I've replaced the relative paths with absolute ones. So as
of now, m
Hi Yonik,
After removing the suggest component, it takes only 7 seconds to start up
now!!! Thank you so much.
Po-Yu
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Can you tell from the logs what Solr is doing during that time?
> Do you have any warming queries configured?
> Also see th
If you're using SolrCloud then you can use composite IDs such as
!doc-id to co-locate documents belonging to a manufacturer together
and at query time, you can add _route_=! to the request to route it
to the correct node.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:00 PM, maninder batth
wrote:
> Hi,
> In my compa
Hi,
In my company, we serve car manuals for different car manufacturers with
their various makes and models. Typically, the search is always done within
context of a car manufacturer, year, make and model. Is there a way in Solr
to create indexes based on this criteria? Currently, the index contain
One other reason for a slow start-up can be large number of segments in the
index. Which I'm guessing is not the case since you optimized? But anyway,
what's the number of segments in both 280G and 185G indices?
Dmitry
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Can you tell from the
I am writing a search bar application with Solr which I'd like to have the
following two features:
phrase matching for user queries - results which match user phrase are
boosted.
Field faceting based on 'tags' field.
When I execute this query:
q=steve jobs&
fq=storeid:527bd613e4b0564cc755460a&
Thanks really a lot Yonik!
Il giorno 03/nov/2014, alle ore 15:51, Yonik Seeley ha scritto:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Matteo Grolla wrote:
>> HI,
>>can anybody give me a confirm?
>> If I add multiple document with the same id but differing on other fields
>> and then issue a comm
Hey Yonik,
That (getting rid of the suggester) solved the issue! You saved me a lot of
time and nerves.
Best,
Michal
2014-11-03 17:19 GMT+01:00 Yonik Seeley :
> One possible cause of a slow startup with the default configs:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6679
>
> -Yonik
> http://
One possible cause of a slow startup with the default configs:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6679
-Yonik
http://heliosearch.org - native code faceting, facet functions,
sub-facets, off-heap data
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Michal Krajňanský
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
> Sorry for t
Can you tell from the logs what Solr is doing during that time?
Do you have any warming queries configured?
Also see this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6679
(comment out suggester related stuff if you aren't using it)
-Yonik
http://heliosearch.org - native code faceting, facet func
Dear All,
Sorry for the possibly newbie question as I have only recently started
experimenting with Solr and Solrcloud.
I am trying to import an index originally created with Lucene 2.x so Solr
4.10. What I did was:
1. upgrade index to version 3.x with IndexUpgrader
2. upgrade index to version
Hi,
I am using Solr 4.9 with Tomcat and it works fine except that the
deployment of solr.war is too long. While deploying Solr, all webapps on
Tomcat stop responding which is unacceptable. Most articles I found say
that it might result from big transaction log because of uncommitted
documents, but
bq: Was a little, let's say mistake, in my query
Been there, done that ;) Thanks for closing this out.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 3:25 AM, andreic9203 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> And to answer to my question...:D
>
> Was a little, let's say mistake, in my query.
> Instead of
> fl=[child parentF
>From memory, if you use UniqFieldsUpdateProcessor after
DistributedUpdateProcessor, then you will be filtering on the set ["1",
"2", "3", "2"].
**
* *
* *
* myMultValueField
*
* *
**
**
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Matteo Grolla wrote:
> HI,
> can anybody give me a confirm?
> If I add multiple document with the same id but differing on other fields and
> then issue a commit (no commits before this) the last added document gets
> indexed, right?
Correct.
> using sol
An update:
Another idea comes from Erick Hatcher; sharing it for the benefit of anyone
who's interested in the topic:
maybe you can make a custom request handler that toggles
which is the default chain?
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> Thanks, Mike,
>
> we have discussed
The update processors are only processing the values in the "source" data,
not the data that has already been indexed and stored.
We probably need to file a Jira to add an "insert" field value option that
merges in the new field value, skipping it if it already exists or appending
it to the en
In case anyone else runs into this, I've managed to make it work. I didn't
notice in the ticket discussion that the specific feature is enabled when
min_rf >=2, I was setting min_rf=1. It goes without saying that you should
also have at least 2 replicas in your SolrCloud configuration. The actual
c
Thanks, Mike,
we have discussed something similar with steffkes on IRC today, where I
said: "some programmatic convenience would be great of course. But I could
in principle imagine having two versions of solrconfig.xml and swapping
them followed by a core reload. It just sounds a bit scary to me.
HI,
can anybody give me a confirm?
If I add multiple document with the same id but differing on other fields and
then issue a commit (no commits before this) the last added document gets
indexed, right?
H.p.
using solr 4 and default settings for optimistic locking.
Matteo
Hi,
forgot to mention:
FOSDEM 2015 takes place in Brussels on January 31th and February 1st, 2015. See
also: https://fosdem.org/2015/
I hope to see you there!
Uwe
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uschind...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 1:29 PM
> To: d.
Just to get the obvious sledgehammer solution out of the way - upload a
new, edited solrconfig.xml with the default changed, and reload the core.
-Mike
On 11/3/14 6:28 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
Hello solr fellows,
I'm working on a project that involves using two update chains. One default
chain
***Please forward this CFP to anyone who may be interested in participating.***
Hi,
Search has evolved to be much more than simply full-text search. We now rely on
“search engines” for a wide variety of functionality:
search as navigation, search as analytics and backend for data visualization
Hello solr fellows,
I'm working on a project that involves using two update chains. One default
chain is used most of the time and another one custom is used sporadically.
The default update chain is called automatically without action needed
(well, that's why it is default).
The custom pipeline
Hello,
And to answer to my question...:D
Was a little, let's say mistake, in my query.
Instead of
fl=[child parentFilter="cat:PARENT" childFilter="cat:CHILD"]
should be
fl=id,[child parentFilter="cat:PARENT" childFilter="cat:CHILD"]
Awkward, because if you put the query and the filter in URL or
Hi Ahmet,
When I add the RunUpdateProcessorFactory Solr didn't remove any duplications.
Any other idea?
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com.INVALID]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 1:35 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ignoring Duplicates in Mul
Thanks James, this did help a lot.
Is it possible to make DirectSolrSpellChecker try to return suggestions with
maximum length of matching leading characters?
Alexander
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dyer, James [mailto:james.d...@ingramcontent.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. September 20
50 matches
Mail list logo
