Do keep one thing in mind though. If you are already doing the work of
figuring out the right shard leader (through solrJ or otherwise), using
that location with just the collection name might be suboptimal if there
are multiple shard leaders present in the same instance -- the collection
name
Hi,
I'm trying to configure a different core discovery root directory in
solr.xml with the coreRootDirectory setting as described in
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Format+of+solr.xml
I'd like to just set it to a subdirectory of solr home (a cores
directory to avoid
Hi all,
Any idea on my issue below?
Thanks
Francois
-Original Message-
From: Grollier, Francois: IT (PRG)
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 6:19 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: recovery process - node with stale data elected leader
Hi,
I'm running solrCloud 4.6.0 and I
Sorry for the basic question
q=*:*fq=-sku:2471834fq=FiltroDispo:1fq=has_image:1rows=100fl=descCat3,IDCat3,ranking2group=truegroup.field=IDCat3group.sort=ranking2+descgroup.ngroups=true
returns some groups with no results. I'm using solr 4.8.0, the collection
has 3 shards
Am I missing some
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6710
2014-11-05 21:56 GMT+01:00 Mikhail Khludnev mkhlud...@griddynamics.com:
I'm wondered too, but it seems it warmups queryResultCache
Hi,
it might be a silly question, but are you sure that a Solr core
collection1 exists? Or does it have a different name?
At least you would get a 404 if no such core exists.
Regards,
Andreas
nbosecker wrote on 11/05/2014 09:12 PM:
Hi all,
I'm working on updating legacy Solr to 4.10.2 to
Hi,
It's possible remove store data of an index deleting the unwanted fields
from schema.xml and after do an optimize over the index?
Thanks,
/yago
-
Best regards
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Delete-data-from-stored-documents-tp4167990.html
Sent
Hi Giovanni,
afaik grouping is not completly working with solr cloud. You maybe could check:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5046
In addition, documents that should be grouped, need to be in the same shard
(You can use router.field=IDCat3 to place all of your documents with the same
Hi,
I have a use-case where Java applications need to create Solr indexes
dynamically. Schema fields of these indexes differ and should be defined
by the Java application upon creation.
So I'm trying to use the Core Admin API [1] to create new cores and the
Schema API [2] to define fields.
nope.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:19 PM, yriveiro yago.rive...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It's possible remove store data of an index deleting the unwanted fields
from schema.xml and after do an optimize over the index?
Thanks,
/yago
-
Best regards
--
View this message in context:
Hi Trey,
Not exactly the same but we did something similar with (e)dismax's mm
parameter. By autoRelax'ing it.
In your example,
try with mm=3 if numFound 20 then try with mm=2 etc.
Ahmet
On Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:41 AM, Trey Grainger solrt...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious if there
I've had a bad enough experience with the default shard placement that I
create a collection with one shard, add the shards where I want them, then
use add/delete replica to move the first one to the right machine/port.
Typically this is in a SolrCloud of dozens or hundreds of shards. Our
shards
Hello,
I have [mistakenly] created a SOLR index in which the document IDs contain URIs
such as file:///Z:/1933/01/1933_01.png .
In a single SOLR update command, how can I:
- copy the contents of each document's id field to a new field called 'url',
after replacing 'Z:' by 'Y:'
- make SOLR
Thanks for the reply!
My Solr has 2 cores(collection1/collection2), I can access them via the Solr
dashboard with no problem.
https://myserver:9943/solr/#/collection1
https://myserver:9943/solr/#/collection2
I can also verify the solrconfig.xml for them contain the schemaless config:
Yeah, please create a JIRA. There are a couple of umbrella JIRAs that
you might want to link it to
I'm not sure it quite fits in either, if not just let it hang out there bear:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6703
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6084
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at
An oversight I think. If you create a patch, let me know and we can
get it committed.
Hmmm, not sure though, this'll change the current behavior that people might be
counting on
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Andreas Hubold
andreas.hub...@coremedia.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to configure
Ok, I just booted fresh solr 4.10.2, started example-schemaless and
hit http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/schema/fields - and it
worked.
So, I suspect the problem is not with Solr but with your setup around
it. For example, is your Solr listening on port 9943 directly (and not
8983) or do
No way that I know of, re-indexing is in order.
Solr does not update in place, you have to re-add the document. Well,
AtomicUpdates work but iff all fields are stored. And it still wouldn't
be a single Solr command.
Best,
Erick
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:20 AM, phi...@free.fr wrote:
Hello,
I
Hi Trey,
In an application I built few years ago, I had a component that rewrote the
input query into a Lucene BooleanQuery and we would set the
minimumNumberShouldMatch value for the query. Worked well, but lately we
are trying to move away from writing our own custom components since
On 11/6/2014 12:02 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
An oversight I think. If you create a patch, let me know and we can
get it committed.
Hmmm, not sure though, this'll change the current behavior that people might
be
counting on
Relative to the solr home sounds like the best option to me.
Sadly, it seems it wasn't been done so far. It's either custom similarity
or function query.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Trey Grainger solrt...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious if there are some suggestions here. The use case is fairly
simple:
Given a query like python OR solr OR hadoop, I
I have some level of logging in Tomcat, and I can see that SolrDispatchFilter
is being invoked:
2014-11-06 17:23:19,016 [catalina-exec-3] DEBUG SolrDispatchFilter
- Closing out SolrRequest: {}
But that really isn't terribly helpful. Is there more logging that I could
invoke to get
When using Collections API CREATE action, I found that sometimes default
shard placement is correct (leader and replica on different servers) and
sometimes not. So I was looking for a simple and reliable way to ensure
better placement.
It seems like I will have to do it manually for best control,
Thanks for the response guys! Appreciate it.
*Vishal Sharma** Team Lead, Grazitti Interactive*T: +1
650 641 1754
E: vish...@grazitti.com
www.grazitti.com [image: Description: LinkedIn]
http://www.linkedin.com/company/grazitti-interactive[image: Description:
Twitter]
24 matches
Mail list logo