Dear Erick,
Thank you, I fond it's the problem of my text segmentation setting.
Anyway, thanks.
Regards,
Jerome
2015-06-21 0:43 GMT+08:00 Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com:
Just that this _shouldn't_ be going on at all. Either
1 you've done something when setting up this collection
Thank you Erick,
What is the recommended way to manually change clusterstate.json?
Is there a java code \ script way of editing a file in ZK?
Best,
Arnon
From: Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: 23/06/2015 09:09 PM
Subject:Re: Implicit
Hi we have a multiValued spatial RPT field. Each document has 0 or more
coordinate pairs attached to it. I derived the coordinate pairs from the
spatial facetting heatmap and i have the count that comes with it, to do so i
had to translate the heatmap grid to a list of coordinate pairs with the
You can use the server/scripts/cloud-scripts/zkcli.sh script (or the cmd
one) in server/scripts/cloud-scripts. Note, in older versions this is in
example/scripts/cloud-scripts.
I just used this command to get the file from zookeeper:
server/scripts/cloud-scripts/zkcli.sh -z localhost:9983 -cmd
I think there is no issue with query escaping. I am doing shard query to my
main solr server, and from inside the main solr server I am doing simple *:*
query to another solr server by using solrj. But most of the time I get
following error. Cannot parse '*:*': Encountered EOF at line 1, column
Erick,
related that I noticed that a lot of times, a developer would need an
intermediate API that will proxy the Search UI requests to Solr.
Of course there are scenarios where is necessary to build this intermediate
API ( for example if you customise how the results must be processed after
Solr
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Vishnu Mishra wrote:
I think there is no issue with query escaping. I am doing shard query to
my
main solr server, and from inside the main solr server I am doing simple
*:*
query to another solr server by using solrj. But most of the time I get
Some clarification:
I would like to understand how solr processes fq (without cache) versus q
when sort and group are required.
From:
Esther Goldbraich/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
To:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc:
Arnon Yogev/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, Shai Erera/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
Date:
24/06/2015 02:29 PM
On 6/24/2015 4:16 AM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote:
related that I noticed that a lot of times, a developer would need an
intermediate API that will proxy the Search UI requests to Solr.
Of course there are scenarios where is necessary to build this intermediate
API ( for example if you
Hi,
We are comparing the performance of fq versus q for queries that are
actually filters and should not be cached.
In part of queries we see strange behavior where q performs 5-10x better
than fq. The question is why?
An example1:
q=maildate:{DATE1 to DATE2} COMPARED TO
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015, at 08:41 PM, sudeepgarg wrote:
Hi,
can someone help me in this regard?
What additional help do you need?
Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015, at 10:51 PM, sudeepgarg wrote:
I would like to ask that after merging with old segments which was
generated
with term vectors=true this won't cause any trouble i.e. index corruption
or
index mismatch. and new segments will be merge with old segments
irrespective we
Just pulled and launched Solr 5.2.1
dropped multivalued child into see data below. Response is quite correct:
id:22, COLOR_s:Blue,SIZE_ss:[XL,XXL]}]}]
Are you wanting to do no scoring at all, or just have a portion of the
query not contribute to the score?
If you don't want scoring at all, just sort by another field. If you
don't have a field, I just tried sort=1 desc, and it worked! This
should, if I'm right, pull documents out of the index in
I would like to ask that after merging with old segments which was generated
with term vectors=true this won't cause any trouble i.e. index corruption or
index mismatch. and new segments will be merge with old segments
irrespective we have disable the term feature or not.
And we are fine with
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7719
I will work on it as soon as I can, it is very simple.
Cheers
2015-05-06 13:38 GMT+01:00 Alessandro Benedetti benedetti.ale...@gmail.com
:
Exactly Tomnaso ,
I was referring to that !
I wrote another mail in the dev mailing list, I will open a
I want to know what is impact to disable term vector to existing production
environment, I mean how new segments create and how old segments will merge
with new segments because before this term vector was enable.
I have one more question Is schema.xml file read during solr core optimization?
Hi All,
I built the Solr index with 14 M records.
I have 20 G RAM in my local machine, and the Solr instance was started
with -Xms1024m -Xmx8196m
The following query:
http://localhost:8983/solr/db-mssql/select?q=*:*fq=GatewayCode:(YYZ)fq=DestCode:(CUN)fq=Duration:(5
OR 6 OR 7 OR
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015, at 03:27 PM, Upayavira wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015, at 02:50 PM, sudeep kumar wrote:
I want to know what is impact to disable term vector to existing
production environment, I mean how new segments create and how old
segments will merge with new segments because
On 6/24/2015 5:28 AM, Esther Goldbraich wrote:
We are comparing the performance of fq versus q for queries that are
actually filters and should not be cached.
In part of queries we see strange behavior where q performs 5-10x better
than fq. The question is why?
An example1:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015, at 02:50 PM, sudeep kumar wrote:
I want to know what is impact to disable term vector to existing
production environment, I mean how new segments create and how old
segments will merge with new segments because before this term vector was
enable.
I have one more
as i understood that after merging with old segments which was generated with
term vectors=true this won't cause any trouble i.e. index corruption or
index mismatch. and new segments will be merge with old segments
irrespective we have disable the term feature or not. And we are fine with
this
There's also a nifty plugin for IntelliJ that'll allow you to edit files on ZK
if you use that IDE.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
You can use the server/scripts/cloud-scripts/zkcli.sh script (or the cmd
one) in server/scripts/cloud-scripts. Note, in older
See inline.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:49 PM, seunghun@leaseplan.com wrote:
Hi
I am new and learning Solr-5.2.1. I am using windows without
servlet.(using post.jar)
i have manage to index some files and try searching on
http://localhost:8983/solr/test/browse
I have few question to ask.
Tell us a bit more about your test setup. 1 or 2 tests
don't mean much. For instance, if the fq query has to
load the low-level caches from disk then the q-only
query is run and doesn't that could skew the results.
Or if somehow you're hitting the queryResultCache. Or
Frankly I'd disable all
Why is cache=false set for the filter?
Grouping uses a 2 pass algorithm by default, so that means that the
filter will need to be generated twice (I think) if caching is turned
off.
Also, when you try to use the fq version, what are you using for the
main query?
-Yonik
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at
Yonik added syntax to request a constant score query in Solr with the ^=
operator.
For example: +color:blue^=1 text:shoes
See:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7218
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Shawn,
What's Solr
In part of queries we see strange behavior where q performs 5-10x better
than fq. The question is why?
Are you sure that the query result cache is disabled ?
2015-06-24 13:28 GMT+02:00 Esther Goldbraich estherg...@il.ibm.com:
Hi,
We are comparing the performance of fq versus q for queries
Thanks Shawn,
What's Solr equivalence to ConstantScoreQuery? I.e., what if you want to
run a query that does not score, but only filter. The rationale behind
using a non-cached 'fq' was just that.
Shai
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 6/24/2015 5:28
Hi,
can someone help me in this regard?
Thanks,
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Term-Vector-and-Optimization-tp4213647p4213732.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi
I am new and learning Solr-5.2.1. I am using windows without
servlet.(using post.jar)
i have manage to index some files and try searching on
http://localhost:8983/solr/test/browse
I have few question to ask.
1. Can i modify browse to show little bit of the content that i search?
ex)
Ah thanks. I see it was added in 5.1 - is there any other way prior to that
(like 4.7)?
if not, I guess the only option is to not use fq if we don't intend to
cache it, and on 5.1 use the ^= syntax.
Shai
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Jack Krupansky jack.krupan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yonik
32 matches
Mail list logo
