Is there a way to see if a JOIN retrieved any results from the secondary index?

Hello everyone,   we have two cores in our Solr Index (Solr 5.1). The primary index contains metadata, the secondary fulltexts. We use JOINs to query the primary index and include results from the secondary. Now we are trying to find a way to see in the results whether a result document has hits

Re: Concurrent Indexing and Searching in Solr.

Hi, I used solr 5.2.1 version. It is fast, I think. But again, I am stuck on concurrent searching and threading. I changed *2* to *100*. And apply simultaneous searching using 100 workers. It works fast but not upto the mark. It increases searching from 1.5 to 0.5 seconds. But If I run only

plagiarism Checker with solr

Dear All, Can any one let us know how to implement plagiarism Checker with solr, how to index content with shingles and what to send in queries Roshan -- Siddhast Ip innovation (P) ltd 907 chandra vihar colony Jhansi-284002 M:+919871549769 M:+917376314900

SolrNet and deep pagination

Hi there, Has anyone worked with deep pagination using SolrNet? The SolrNet version that I am using is v0.4.0.2002. I followed up with this article, https://github.com/mausch/SolrNet/blob/master/Documentation/CursorMark.md , however the version of SolrNet.dll does not expose the a StartOrCursor

Re: SolrJ update

Hi Andrea, Thanks for the explanation on that. I ended up doing that, getting and setting an UUID on the Java code. On 08/08/2015 03:19 AM, Andrea Gazzarini wrote: Hi Henrique, I don't believe there's an easy way to do that. As you noticed, the SolrInputDocument is not an I/O param, that is,

Re: Concurrent Indexing and Searching in Solr.

On 8/7/2015 1:15 PM, Nitin Solanki wrote: > I wrote a python script for indexing and using > urllib and urllib2 for indexing data via http.. There are a number of Solr python clients. Using a client makes your code much easier to write and understand. https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolPython I ha

Certification

Is there a industry standard certification on solr?

Re: docValues

Json Nested faceting on string,string,double fields. Facet function 'sum' is applied on double field Without docValue response for the same query 1) First response without cache 765 Ms 2) second response with cache 28 Ms 3) third response with cache 78 Ms 4) fourth response with cache 94 Ms With

Re: docValues

Interesting... what type of field was this? (string or numeric? single or multi-valued?) Without docValues, the first request would be slow (due to building the in-memory field cache entry), but after that it should be fast. -Yonik On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Nagasharath wrote: > I Have t

Re: docValues

I Have tested with docValue and without docValue on the test indexes with a json nested faceting query. Have noticed performance boot with the docValue.The response time with Cached items and without cached items is good. I have noticed that the response time on the cached items of the index wi

Re: serious data loss bug in correlation with "too much data after closed"

By now I'm pretty much sure that this is either a bug in solr or in http-client. I again reproduced the problem: 1. during massive indexing we see some WARNINGS from HttpParser: "badMessage: java.lang.IllegalStateException: too much data after closed for HttpChannelOverHttp" checking in httpcore

JMX warning in Solr

I've got following repeating exception in my log: javax.management.InstanceNotFoundException: solr/collection:type=searcher,id=org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.getMBean(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:1095) at com.sun.jmx.interceptor