Yes, that is what my understanding is but if you see the Replication
handler response it is saying it is referring to the index folder not to
the one shown in index.properties. Due to that confusion I am not able to
delete the folder.
Is this some bug or default behavior where irrespective of the
Hi,
Would like to check, Is there anyway which we can detect the number of
attachments and their names during indexing of EML files in Solr, and index
those information into Solr?
Currently, Solr is able to use Tika and Tesseract OCR to extract the
contents of the attachments. However, I could
Yes. You can get my full solr.log from the link below. The error is there
when I tried to create collection1 (around line 170 to 300) .
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1qkMLTRJ4eDSFwbqr15wSqjbg4dJV-bGN
Regards,
Edwin
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 18:39, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Please look for the
Yes, I have restarted both Solr and ZooKeeper after the changes. In fact I
have tried to restart the whole system, but the problem still persists.
Below is my configuration for zoo.cfg.
# The number of milliseconds of each tick
tickTime=2000
# The number of ticks that the initial
#
The DataImportHandler, an optional but popular module to pull in data from
databases and other sources, has a feature in which the whole DIH
configuration can come from a request's "dataConfig" parameter. The debug
mode of the DIH admin screen uses this to allow convenient debugging /
development
It's correct behaviour , Solr put replica index file in this format only
and you can find latest index pointing in index.properties file. Usually
afer successful full replication Solr remove old timestamp dir.
On Wed, 31 Jul, 2019, 8:02 PM Aman Tandon, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are having a situation
I wonder if you have some sort of JDBC pool enabled and/or the number
of worker threads is configured differently. Compare tomcat level
configuration and/or try thread dump of the java runtime when you are
stuck.
Or maybe something similar on the Postgres side.
Regards,
Alex.
On Wed, 31 Jul
Hi,
Hi,
1)Have you tried running _just_ your SQL queries to see how long they take to
respond and whether it responds with the full result set of batches
The 9th request returns only 2 rows. This behaviour is happening for all the
cores which have more than 8 SQL requests. But the same is
Hi,
We are having a situation where whole disk space is full and in server
where we are seeing the multiple index directories ending with the
timestamp. Upon checking the index.properties file for a particular shard
replica, it is not referring to the folder name *index *but when I am using
the
Hi,
1) Solr on Tomcat has not been an option for quite a while. So, you must be
running an old version of Solr. Which one?
We are using Solr 5.2.1(WAR based deployment so)
5) DIH is not actually recommended for production, more for exploration; you
may want to consider moving to a stronger
A couple of things:
1) Solr on Tomcat has not been an option for quite a while. So, you
must be running an old version of Solr. Which one?
2) Compare that you have the same Solr config. In Admin UI, there will
be all O/S variables passed to the Java runtime, I would check them
side-by-side
3) You
Hello,
We are trying to run Solr(Tomcat) on Azure instance and postgres being the DB.
When I run full import(my core has 18 SQL queries), for some reason, the
requests will go till 9 and it gets hung for eternity.
But the same setup, solr(tomcat) and postgres database works fine with AWS
This works fine for me. Are you completely sure that
1> you pushed the changed config to the right place
2> you reloaded your server?
One thing I do is go to the admin UI and check for the collection core) and
bring up the schema file just to be sure that I’m using the schema I think I am.
I’d
The short answer is “yes, ranking will be different”. This is inevitable since
the stats are different in your X field, there are more terms, the frequency of
any given term is different, etc.
I’d argue, though, that using qf with a list of fields can be tweaked to give
you better results. For
Hi everyone,
I'm indexing my data into multiple Solr fields, such as A, B, C and I'm
also copying all the data of those fields into a master field such as X.
By default, my "qf" is set to X so anytime a user is searching they are
searching across the data that also exist in fields A, B and C.
Hi,
we have something about 400 000 000 items in a solr collection.
We have set up auto commit property for this collection to 15 minutes.
Is a big collection and we using some caches etc. Therefore we have big
autocommit value.
This have disadvantage that we haven't NRT searches.
We would like
Hi Erick,
Thanks your advice.
I already removed it from the field definition used by the suggester and it
works great. I will consider to took it from the entire processing of the
other fields. I have only 7000 docs with index size of 18MB so far, so the
memory footprint is not a key issue for
I tried to add Jaroslaw as an editor of that one page by adding him under
"Restrictions" tab of the page. But it does not work.
Anyone with higher Confluence skills who can tell how to give the edit bit for
a single page to individuals. I know how to add edit permission for the whole
WIKI space
Roland:
Have you considered just not using stopwords anywhere? Largely they’re a
holdover
from a long time ago when every byte counted. Plus using stopwords has
“interesting”
issues with things like highlighting and phrase queries and the like.
Sure, not using stopwords will make your index
Do be aware that if you are using indexes created with 6x you will be required
to completely re-index when you upgrade to Solr 8. IndexupgraderTool doesn’t
help with this, i.e. you _cannot_ go from 6x->7x with 7x's IndexupGraderTool
then go from 7x->8x.
Best,
Erick
> On Jul 31, 2019, at 6:35
Hello,
I have found a strange issue with inplace updates. When i have
TimeStampUpdateProcessor configured in my updateRequestProcessorChain like
following:
mydate
and i am doing a inplace update on pint field, then inplace update runs fine,
but the indexed fields(fieldtype
Updated correct zoo.cfg? Did you restart zookeeper after config change ?
> Am 30.07.2019 um 04:05 schrieb Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo :
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using the new Solr 8.2.0 with SolrCloud and external ZooKeeper 3.5.5.
>
> However, after adding in the line under zoo.cfg
>
Please look for the full log file solr.log in your Solr server, and share it
via some file sharing service or gist or similar for us to be able to decipher
the collection create error.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 31. jul. 2019 kl. 08:33 skrev
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:54 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> The FS backup feature requires a shared drive as you say, and this is
> clearly documented. No way around it. Cloud Filestore would likely fix it.
>
> Or you could write a new backup repo plugin for backup directly to Google
> Cloud Storage?
>
Hi
Go for 8.2, as 7.x will be end of life later this year. If you find any know
bugs in 8.2.0 that you cannot live with, wait for 8.2.1 which would maximize
stability.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 30. jul. 2019 kl. 22:53 skrev Arnold Bronley :
>
Hi,
Regarding the issue, I have tried to put the following in zoo.cfg under
ZooKeeper:
4lw.commands.whitelist=mntr,conf,ruok
But it is still showing this error.
*"Errors: - membership: Check 4lq.commands.whitelist setting in zookeeper
configuration file."*
As I am using SolrCloud, the
The idea of using an external program could be good.
> Am 31.07.2019 um 08:06 schrieb Salmaan Rashid Syed
> :
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for your invaluable and helpful answers.
>
> I currently don't have an external zookeeper loaded. I am working as per
> the documentation for solr cloud
Ad 1) it needs to be configured in Zookeeper server and Solr and all other ZK
clients
Ad 2) you never need to shut it down in production for updating Synonym files.
Use the config set API to reupload the full configuration included updated
synonyms:
Hi all,
Thanks for your invaluable and helpful answers.
I currently don't have an external zookeeper loaded. I am working as per
the documentation for solr cloud without external zookeeper. I will later
add the external zookeeper once the changes works as expected.
*1) Will I still need to make
29 matches
Mail list logo
