Hi community,
During integration tests with new data source I have noticed weird scenario
where replacement character can't be searched, though, seems to be stored.
I mean, honestly, I don't want that irrelevant data stored in my index but
I wondered if solr can index replacement character (U+FFFD
Any one help me for my question?
Regards,
Vishal
From: vishal patel
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2020 12:18 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: uploading model in Solr 6.6
Hi
what is meaning of weight of feature at the time Uploading a Model for
when checked in to *opt/solr/volumes/data/cores/ both
**k04o95kz_shard2_replica_n10
and **k04o95kz_shard3_replica_n16 replicate are not present no idea how
they got deleted.*
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:13 PM sambasivarao giddaluri <
sambasiva.giddal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> We are getting
Hi All,
We are getting below exception from Solr where 3 zk with 3 solr nodes and 3
replicas. It was working fine and we got this exception unexpectedly.
-
- *k04o95kz_shard2_replica_n10:*
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
Index dir
Is "smart" really smarter than one explicitly defined?
For "emun" type, would it be faster to define facet.method=enum than smart?
Jae
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020, 9:15 PM Pushkar Mishra wrote:
> Hi Erick,
> First of all thanks for your response . I will check the possibility .
> Let me explain my problem in detail :
>
> 1. We have other use cases where we are making use of listener on
> postCommit to delete/shift/split the shards .
Hi All,
Any suggestions on below observation, can i use Char Filter to retain old
behavior of Standard Tokenizer ?
Thanks,
Deepu
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 4:59 PM Deepu wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We are in process of migrating from Solr 5 to solr 8, during testing
> observed that Standard tokenizer
On 11/30/2020 7:50 AM, David Smiley wrote:
Yes, absolutely to what Eric said. We goofed on news / release highlights
on how to communicate what's happening in Solr. From a Solr insider point
of view, we are "deprecating" because strictly speaking, the code isn't in
our codebase any longer.
Hi Erick,
First of all thanks for your response . I will check the possibility .
Let me explain my problem in detail :
1. We have other use cases where we are making use of listener on
postCommit to delete/shift/split the shards . So we have capability to
delete the shards .
2. The current use
Are you using the implicit router? Otherwise you cannot delete a shard.
And you won’t have any shards that have zero documents anyway.
It’d be a little convoluted, but you could use the collections COLSTATUS Api to
find the names of all your replicas. Then query _one_ replica of each
shard with
I’m a little confused here. Are you unloading/copying/creating the core on
master?
I’ll assume so since I can’t really think of how doing this on one of the other
cores would make sense…..
I’m having a hard time wrapping my head around the use-case. You’re
“delivering a new index”, which I take
Yes, absolutely to what Eric said. We goofed on news / release highlights
on how to communicate what's happening in Solr. From a Solr insider point
of view, we are "deprecating" because strictly speaking, the code isn't in
our codebase any longer. From a user point of view (the audience of news
Both collapse and grouping are used quite often so I'm not sure I would
agree with the preference for collapse. There is a very specific use case
where collapse performs better and in these scenarios collapse might be the
only option that would work.
The use case where collapse works better is:
You don’t need to abandon DIH right now…. You can just use the Github hosted
version…. The more people who use it, the better a community it will form
around it!It’s a bit chicken and egg, since no one is actively discussing
it, submitting PR’s etc, it may languish. If you use it, and
Hello all,
We are using solr 7.3.1, with master and slave config.
When we deliver a new index we unload the core, with option delete data dir
= true, then recreate the data folder and copy the new index files into
that folder before sending solr a command to recreate the core (with the
same
Hi All,
pushing the query to the top.
Does anyone have any idea about it?
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 11:49 AM Ajay Sharma wrote:
> Hi Community,
>
> This is the first time, I am implementing a solr *highlighting *feature.
> I have read the concept via solr documentation
> Link-
Hi Solr team,
I am using solr cloud.(version 8.5.x). I have a need to find out a
configuration where I can delete a shard , when number of documents reaches
to zero in the shard , can some one help me out to achieve that ?
It is urgent , so a quick response will be highly appreciated .
Thanks
17 matches
Mail list logo
