Thanks Shawn, Amey,
Any specific configuration needed for CloudSolrServer as I've seen
increased latency on using it. Does ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer itself do
discovery like CloudSolrServer.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/13/2014 5:28 AM, Apoorva Gaur
Hello All,
Is it preferable to use CloudSolrServer or using an external load balancer
like haproxy. We're currently channeling all our requests via haproxy but
want to get rid of management hassles as well as additional network call
but saw a significant degradation in latency on switching to
Clou
Try using a custom value source parser and pass the "formula" of computing
the price to solr; something like this
http://java.dzone.com/articles/connecting-redis-solr-boosting
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Scott Smith
wrote:
> There are likely several hundred groups. Also, new groups will be
Hello All,
We are trying to provide a personalized sort order for each user. We've a
per-computed list of user to products and if it matches the solr result set
those products need to be shown upfront. One way can be handling this in
application but pagination becomes tricky. Another way we are ex
I faced the same issue sometime back, root cause is docs getting deleted
and created again without getting optimized. Here is the discussion
http://www.signaldump.org/solr/qpod/22731/docfreq-coming-to-be-more-than-1-for-unique-id-field
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Johannes Siegert <
johannes.
ion
> files, the core gets reloaded by itself to reflect the changes. I am not
> sure if you can disable this reloading.
>
> Finally, I thought of creating files on slaves in a different way.
>
> Thanks
> Kamal
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Apoorva Gaurav
In fact its better using TrieIntField instead of IntField.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201301.mbox/%3ccab_8yd9yp259kk4ciybbprjcpwqp6vd7yvrtjr1eubew_ky...@mail.gmail.com%3E
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13372323/what-is-the-correct-solr-fieldtype-to-use-for-sorting
Hey Kamal,
What all config changes have you done to establish replication of external
files and how have you disabled role reloading?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It was found that external file, which was getting replicate
Hello Markus, Ahmet,
Forgot to update the thread; optimization works i.e. after optimizing all
unique keys have docFreq as 1.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : text in it, query is of the type "keywords:(word1 OR word2 ... OR
> wordN)".
> : The client is relying on d
OK lets for a moment forget about this specific use case and consider a
more general case. Lets say the field name is "keywords" are we are storing
text in it, query is of the type "keywords:(word1 OR word2 ... OR wordN)".
The client is relying on default relevancy based sort returned by solr.
Some
Currently we are not using SolrJ but are simply interacting with solr with
json over http, this will change in a couple of months but currently not
there. As of now we are putting all the logic in query building, using it
to query solr and then passing on the json returned by it to front end. I
kno
we have updates on these. Didn't try optimizing will do. But isn't
> the
> > unique field supposed to be unique?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Ahmet Arslan >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Just a guess,
gt; On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 5:58 PM, Apoorva Gaurav <
> apoorva.gau...@myntra.com> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We are using solr 4.4.0. We have a uniqueKey of type solr.StrField. We need
> to extract docs in a pre-defined order if they match a certain condition.
> Our qu
Hello All,
We are using solr 4.4.0. We have a uniqueKey of type solr.StrField. We need
to extract docs in a pre-defined order if they match a certain condition.
Our query is of the format
uniqueField:(id1 ^ weight1 OR id2 ^ weight2 . OR idN ^ weightN)
where weight1 > weight2 > > weig
14 matches
Mail list logo
