This is great that I can get things faster by reducing the gap and by
> > > increasing the number of threads. How to reduce gaps I know: one can
> > > replace "gap": "+1HOUR" with "gap": "+1MONTH" What should I
> > change
>
Hi Solr fans,
I am impressed to see that documentation of solr improves so nicely over
time. If one compares the 7.1 version of json api with the current (8.7)
one sees that additional fields are documented:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_7/json-request-api.html
Query parametersJSON field
ortunately.
>
> But you (or other readers) might find this "Query Facet" example handy
> - it uses the "type": "query" syntax that MIchael mentioned. [1]
>
> [1]
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_5/json-facet-api.html#query-facet
>
> Best,
&
in the text below to increase the number of threads from one to 20?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Arturas
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:54 PM Munendra S N
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Currently, JSON facets have support for specifyin
. By reducing the number of buckets, computation should become
> much faster
>
> Regards,
> Munendra S N
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:52 PM Arturas Mazeika wrote:
>
> > Hi Solr-Users,
> >
> > I am trying to better understand the solr capabilities, how o
"t_buckets": {
> "type": "range",
> "field": "t",
> "sort": { "t": "asc" },
> "start": "2018-05-02T
t;: {
"type": "range",
"field": "t",
"sort": { "t": "asc" },
"start": "2018-05-02T17:00:00.000Z",
"end": "2020-11-16T
Hi Solr Team,
I am trying to check how I can formulate facet queries using JSON format. I
can successfully formulate query, range, term queries, as well as nested
term queries. How can I formulate a nested facet query involving "query" as
well as "range" formulations? The following does not work:
Hi Solr-Users,
I am trying to better understand the solr capabilities, how one can
formulate queries in JSON format as well as tweak parameters. Currently I
have a logs collection (ca 6GB large) with a dozen of attributes running in
single server mode (F:\solr_deployment\solr-8.7.0\bin\solr.cmd st
r values, you’ll see the transformations work. Although
> that screen doesn’t show the CharFitler transformations correctly,
> but the tokens at the end are chained.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> > On Dec 2, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Arturas Mazeika wrote:
> >
> > Hi Solr-Team,
&g
Hi Solr-Team,
The manual of charfilters says that one can chain them: (from
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/charfilterfactories.html#CharFilterFactories-solr.MappingCharFilterFactory
):
CharFilters can be chained like Token Filters and placed in front of a
Tokenizer. CharFilters can add,
as default?
Cheers,
Arturas
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 1:09 PM Jörn Franke wrote:
> How do you send the request? You need to specify the update.chain
> parameter with the name of the Update chain or define it as default
>
> > Am 03.09.2019 um 12:14 schrieb Arturas Mazeika :
> >
Hi Solr Fans,
I am trying to figure out how to use the parse-date processor for pdates.
I am able to insert data with this python code to a solr collection/core:
solr = pysolr.Solr('http://localhost:/solr/core1', timeout=10)
solr.add([
{
"t": '2017-08-19T21:00:42.043Z',
}
])
stead of ‘Program Files (x86)’ use ‘PROGRA~2’
>
> And don’t have spaces in your subdirectory…
>
>
>
> NB: Depending on your Windows Version you may Have another alias for
> ‘Program Files (x86)’; use «dir /X» to view the aliases.
>
>
>
> Gesendet von Mail<https://go.micr
Hi All,
I am testing solr 7.7 (and 7.6) under windows. My aim is to set logging
into a subdirectory that contains spaces of a directory that contains
spaces.
If I set on windows:
setx /m SOLR_LOGS_DIR "f:\solr_deployment\logs"
and start a solr instance:
F:\solr_deployment\solr-7.7.0\bin\solr.c
ocessor factory.
>
> 3) Create a custom Lucene analyzer using html strip char filter and white
> space tokenizer. Use the "invoking the analyzer" example given in
> http://lucene.apache.org/core/7_4_0/core/org/apache/lucene/a
> nalysis/package-summary.html
>
> Ahm
wrote:
> I am confused. Why you do not just add the CharFilter definition to the
> field type you need?
>
> You see to be trying to do it completely on the cliwnt side? No sure.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 2:53 AM Arturas Mazeika, wrote:
>
> >
nted yet. This could also address
> your cluster state fetch error.
>
> You will get significantly better throughput if you batch your
> docs and use the client.add(list_of_documents) BTW.
>
> Another possibility is to use the new metrics (since Solr 6.4). They
> provide
Hi Erick,
wow.
This Email had a such a profound effect and filled so many gaps in my head.
I was wondering how master-slave (through replication) and (quorum based or
whatever the name is) distribution live under the same hood in solr. And in
such a concise manner! Good Job indeed. I wonder wheth
Hi Solr Folk,
What would be the easiest way to use some of the Solr and Lucene components
in SolrJ?
I am pretty amazed how much thought and careful engineering went into some
individual components to cover the wild real world effectively. And I
wonder whether one could re-use some of them in othe
Hi Solr Folk,
I am trying to push solr to the limit and sometimes I succeed. The
questions is how to not go over it, e.g., avoid:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Tried fetching cluster state using the node
names we knew of, i.e. [192.168.56.1:9998_solr, 192.168.56.1:9997_solr,
192.168.56.1:_solr,
indeed!
Cheers,
Arturas
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/29/2018 8:47 AM, Arturas Mazeika wrote:
>
>> Out of curiosity: some cores give infos for both shards (through
>> replication query) and some only for one (if you still be able to see the
>&
). I wonder why..
Cheers,
Arturas
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/29/2018 7:53 AM, Arturas Mazeika wrote:
>
>> but the query reports infos on only one shard:
>>
>> F:\solr_server\solr-7.2.1>curl -s
>> http://localhost:9996/solr/de_wik
Hi Solr-Team,
I am benchmarking solr with the German Wikipedia pages on 4 nodes (Running
on ports , 9998, 9997 and 9996), 4 shards, replication factor 2):
"F:\solr_server\solr-7.2.1\bin\solr.cmd" start -m 3g -cloud -p -s
"F:\solr_server\solr-7.2.1\example\cloud\node1\solr"
"F:\solr_serve
highly puzzled. Comments are very welcome.
I'll keep an eye on what's going on and keep you guys informed. Thanks for
the support!!
Cheers,
Arturas
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Arturas Mazeika wrote:
> Hi Shawn, et al,
>
> I haven't thought about ip6. Interestin
quot;F:\solr_server\solr-7.2.1\bin\solr.cmd" start -m 1g -cloud -p -s
"F:\solr_server\solr-7.2.1\example\cloud\node1\solr"
"F:\solr_server\solr-7.2.1\bin\solr.cmd" start -m 1g -cloud -p 9998 -s
"F:\solr_server\solr-7.2.1\example\cloud\node2\solr" -z 127.0
Hi Solr Folks,
I was benchmarking solrCloud with the German Wikipedia docs under Windows
10 Pro, noticed that Windows defender was grabbing resources substantially,
changed the policy (so windows defender would not kick in). Since then I am
not able to download the config files from the solrCloud
Hi Shawn et al,
Thanks a lot for the prompt answer.
It looks to me that I made quite a few mistakes in formulating those solr
queries. Setting shards.qt to the name of the core was completely wrong. I
tried to search for shards.qt in http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_3/
but it did not give an
Hi Solr-Team,
I am familiarizing myself with solr cloud and I am trying out and compare
different processing setups. Short story: term-query ran on shard gives
lower numbers compared querying the complete index. I wonder why.
Long story:
I grabbed the 2.7.1 version of solr, created a 4 core se
Hi Erick, Shawn, et al,
Thanks a lot for a piece of wisdom Especially for unit tests,
findRecursive, as well as ideas how to get to infos that one is looking
for. Good job indeed.
Cheers,
Arturas
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:22 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/3/2018 9:07 AM, Arturas Mazeika wr
Hi Solr Team,
Short question:
How can I systematically explore the solrj functionality/API?
Long question:
I am discovering solrj functionality and I am pretty much impressed what
solrj can do. What I am less impressed is my knowledge how to find what I
am looking for. On the positive side, one
t; issue LUCENE-7924 ... but so far no one has attempted the
> tooling/scripting work needed to make it happen.
>
> Pathes certainly welcome.
>
>
>
> : Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 09:55:35 +0200
> : From: Arturas Mazeika
> : Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> : To: solr
Hi Solr-Team,
If I google for specific features for solr, I usually get redirected to 6.6
version of the documentation, like this one:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/overview-of-documents-fields-and-schema-design.html
Since I am playing with 7.2 version of solr, I almost always need to
Hi Walter,
Thanks for the message. Would you care to share the tool with us? I would
be interested.. Or have you shared it already?
Cheers,
Arturas
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 5:09 PM, Walter Underwood
wrote:
> I wrote a Python tool to do this. I use the kazoo package to talk to
> Zookeeper. It st
ds commands in JSON. I looked through the
> ref guide page, and I’m surprised that this isn’t stated directly; I’ll try
> to fix that.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Apr 18, 2018, at 4:12 AM, Arturas Mazeika wrote:
> >
> > Hi solr-users,
>
Hi solr-users,
is it possible to modify the managed schema using schema api and submit the
commands in XML format? I am able to add a data type using:
curl -X POST -H 'Content-type:application/json' --data-binary '{
"add-field-type": {
"name":"text_de_ph",
"class":"solr.TextField",
"posit
Hi All,
Term vector component allows to store and retrieve quite a bit of very
useful information, e.g., for a term one can get:
"verlag",[
"tf",6,
"positions",["position",5, "position",42, "position",64,
"position",85, "position",106, "position",127],
"offsets",[
"start",35, "end",41,
"start
10 vendors.
Consider then answer to be 1% large (there are 10 000 documents satisfying
the query). What would be the complexity of answering it?
Cheers,
Arturas
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Arturas Mazeika wrote:
> Hi Mikhail et al,
>
> Thanks a lot for sharing the code snippet. I
gt; https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/
> lucene/join/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/join/
> ToParentBlockJoinQuery.java#L178
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Arturas Mazeika wrote:
>
> > Hi Mikhail et al,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for a very thorough
018 at 12:36 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> q=+{!parent which=ntype:p v='+msg:Hello +person:Arturas'} +{!parent which=
> ntype:p v='+msg:ciao +person:Vai'}
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Arturas Mazeika
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Mikhail et al,
> >
quot;_childDocuments_":
[
{"id":"2_1", "ntype":"c", "person":"Vai", "time":"4:14",
"msg":"Hi"},
{"id":"2_2", "ntype":"c", "p
quot;ciao"}
]
},
{
"id":2,
"_childDocuments_":
[
{"id":"2_1", "person":"Vai" , "time":"4:14", "msg":"Hello"},
{"id":"2_2", "perso
PM, David Smiley
wrote:
> Thanks for your review!
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:56 AM Arturas Mazeika wrote:
> ...
>
> > What I missed at the beginning of the documentation is the minimal set of
> > requirements that is reacquired to have highlighting sensible: somehow I
Hi Solr Fans,
I am trying to make sense of information retrieval using expressions like
"some parent", "*only parent*", " *all parent*". I am also trying to
understand the syntax "!parent which" and "!child of". On the technical
level, I am reading the following documents:
[1]
https://lucene.apac
l
> The docs for hl.fl, hl.q, hl.qparser were all updated. The meat of the
> change was a new note in hl.fl including an example. It's kinda hard to
> document the problem you found but I hope the note will be somewhat
> illustrative.
>
> ~ David
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018
ndexing analysis chain for that field
> folded ü to just plain u, it wasn't found or highlighted.
>
> On the surface, this does seem like something that should be
> changed, I'll go ahead and ping the dev list.
>
> NOTE: I was trying this on Solr 7.1
>
> Best,
and
> highlight "other" in f2 and f3
>
> Each fields processes its input with the analysis chain defined in the
> schema.
>
> The rest about stored="true" can be ignored, it's just me wandering
> off into the weeds about an optimization that only sto
as user?
>
> The only reason I see myself doing this is CTRL+F in a page when the search
> result is not immediately visible for me ;)
>
> On Mar 23, 2018 9:41 AM, "Arturas Mazeika" wrote:
>
> > Hi Erick et al,
> >
> > From your answer I understand
2...
>
> The above does not bloat your index at all since the cost of
> stored="true" indexed="true" is the same as if you use two fields,
> each with only one option turned on.
>
> The second approach if you want to use FastVectorHighlighter or the
> l
Hi Solr-Users,
I've been playing with a german collection of documents, where I tried to
search for one word (q=Tag) and highlighted another: (hl.q=Kundigung). Is
this a "legal" use case? My key question is how can I tell solr which query
analyzer to use for highlighting? Strictly speaking, I shou
50 matches
Mail list logo