codecs for sorted indexes

2012-04-12 Thread Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
there (PFOR, Simple64, ...). Can you please give us some advice on this? Thanks Carlos Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas CEO, ExperienceOn - New generation search http://www.experienceon.com Mobile: +34 652 911 201 Skype: carlosgonzalezcadenas LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosgonzalezcadenas

Re: codecs for sorted indexes

2012-04-12 Thread Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas c...@experienceon.com wrote: Hello, We're using a sorted index in order to implement early termination efficiently over an index of hundreds of millions of documents. As of now, we're using the default codecs coming with Lucene 4, but we

processing of merged tokens

2012-03-19 Thread Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
and algorithms for this. It would be great if you can help us identify the best way to solve this problem. Thanks a lot for your help. Carlos Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas CEO, ExperienceOn - New generation search http://www.experienceon.com Mobile: +34 652 911 201 Skype: carlosgonzalezcadenas LinkedIn: http

problems with DisjunctionMaxQuery and early-termination

2012-03-16 Thread Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
this problem within SOLR. We do have our own QParser, and therefore we'd be able to implement any arbitrary query construction that you can come up with, or even create a new Query type if it's needed. Thanks a lot for your help, Carlos Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas CEO, ExperienceOn - New generation

Re: problems with DisjunctionMaxQuery and early-termination

2012-03-16 Thread Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
Carlos Regards On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas c...@experienceon.com wrote: Hello all, We have a SOLR index filled with user queries and we want to retrieve the ones that are more similar to a given query entered by an end-user. It is kind of a related queries

problems with DisjunctionMaxQuery and early-termination

2012-03-14 Thread Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
this problem within SOLR. We do have our own QParser, and therefore we'd be able to implement any arbitrary query construction that you can come up with, or even create a new Query type if it's needed. Thanks a lot for your help, Carlos Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas CEO, ExperienceOn - New generation

processing of merged tokens

2012-02-20 Thread Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
for your help. Carlos Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas CEO, ExperienceOn - New generation search http://www.experienceon.com Mobile: +34 652 911 201 Skype: carlosgonzalezcadenas LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosgonzalezcadenas

Re: custom scoring

2012-02-20 Thread Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
. Any ideas on how to make it faster?. Thanks a lot, Carlos Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas CEO, ExperienceOn - New generation search http://www.experienceon.com Mobile: +34 652 911 201 Skype: carlosgonzalezcadenas LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosgonzalezcadenas On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:07 AM

Re: custom scoring

2012-02-20 Thread Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
| wildcard_stopword_shortened_phrase:hoteles | wildcard_stopword_phrase:hoteles),def=0.0),const(0.5)),float(query_score))* Thanks a lot for your help. Carlos Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas CEO, ExperienceOn - New generation search http://www.experienceon.com Mobile: +34 652 911 201 Skype

Re: custom scoring

2012-02-20 Thread Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
like hotels in barcelona have a bigger query_score than less common queries like hotels in barcelona near the beach). Let me know if you need something else. Thanks, Carlos Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas CEO, ExperienceOn - New generation search http://www.experienceon.com Mobile: +34 652 911 201

Re: custom scoring

2012-02-17 Thread Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
16.02.2012 20:29, schrieb Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas: Hello Em: 1) Here's a printout of an example DisMax query (as you can see mostly MUST terms except for some SHOULD terms used for boosting scores for stopwords) * * *((+stopword_shortened_phrase:hoteles

custom scoring

2012-02-16 Thread Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
Hello all: We'd like to score the matching documents using a combination of SOLR's IR score with another application-specific score that we store within the documents themselves (i.e. a float field containing the app-specific score). In particular, we'd like to calculate the final score doing

Re: custom scoring

2012-02-16 Thread Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
, it all goes 10X slower. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks Carlos Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas CEO, ExperienceOn - New generation search http://www.experienceon.com Mobile: +34 652 911 201 Skype: carlosgonzalezcadenas LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosgonzalezcadenas On Thu, Feb 16

Re: custom scoring

2012-02-16 Thread Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
over the score. Thanks a lot for your help, Carlos [1]: http://grokbase.com/p/lucene/solr-user/11bjw87bt5/functionquery-score-0 Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas CEO, ExperienceOn - New generation search http://www.experienceon.com Mobile: +34 652 911 201 Skype: carlosgonzalezcadenas LinkedIn: http

Re: custom scoring

2012-02-16 Thread Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
:) ). Thanks Carlos * * Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas CEO, ExperienceOn - New generation search http://www.experienceon.com Mobile: +34 652 911 201 Skype: carlosgonzalezcadenas LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosgonzalezcadenas On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Em mailformailingli...@yahoo.de wrote

custom scoring

2012-02-13 Thread Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
Hello all: We'd like to score the matching documents using a combination of SOLR's IR score with another application-specific score that we store within the documents themselves (i.e. a float field containing the app-specific score). In particular, we'd like to calculate the final score doing