Re: Phrase query no hits when stopwords and FlattenGraphFilterFactory used

nce. (Also, unfortunately, we do not have the luxury of using super big machines/storage -- so it's always a balancing act for us.) Best, Edd -------- Edward Turner On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 16:22, Walter Underwood wrote: > By far the simplest solution is to leave stopwords in th

Re: Phrase query no hits when stopwords and FlattenGraphFilterFactory used

WordsFrom("This is pretend index or query data") // wordsForSolr = "pretend index query data" Off the top of my head, this will by-pass position issues. I will give this a go, but was wondering whether this is something others have done? Best wishes, Edd Ed

Phrase query no hits when stopwords and FlattenGraphFilterFactory used

ur analysis setup? Any help would be much appreciated -- getting phrase queries to work is an important use-case of ours. Kind regards and thank you in advance, Edd Edward Turner

Re: Solr storage of fields <-> indexed data

That's really good and helpful info, thank you. Perfect. Best wishes, Edd On Mon, 28 Sep 2020, 5:53 pm Shawn Heisey, wrote: > On 9/28/2020 8:56 AM, Edward Turner wrote: > > By removing the copyfields, we've found that our index sizes have reduced > > by ~40% in s

Solr storage of fields <-> indexed data

Hi all, We have recently switched to using edismax + qf fields, and no longer use copyfields to allow us to easily search over values in multiple fields (by copying multiple fields' values to the copyfield destinations, and then performing queries over the destination field). By removing the copy

Re: Manipulating client's query using a Query object

ication, before sending it to Solr, which I suppose isn't the way to do it. Many thanks, Edd -------- Edward Turner On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 21:23, Markus Jelsma wrote: > Hello Edward, > > You asked for the 'Lucene Query representation of the client's query'

Re: Manipulating client's query using a Query object

erver side in Solr?) Kind regards, Edd -------- Edward Turner On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 15:06, Markus Jelsma wrote: > Hello Edward, > > Yes you can by extending ExtendedDismaxQParser [1] and override its > parse() method. You get the main Query object through super.parse()

Manipulating client's query using a Query object

Hi all, Thanks for all your help recently. We're now using the edismax query parser and are happy with its behaviour. We have another question which maybe someone can help with. We have one use case where we optimise our query before sending it to Solr, and we do this by manipulating the client's

Re: Multiple "df" fields

Goodness me, woops, yes, it was a typo -- sorry fo the confusion. We're indeed exploring qf, rather than pf! :). So far it's looking promising! Thanks for your eagle-eye spotting! Best, Edd -------- Edward Turner On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 13:15, Erick Erickson wrote: &g

Re: Multiple "df" fields

e pf field (thanks to Alexandre R. for this) to automatically search on multiple fields, rather than relying on df. Kind regards, Edd -------- Edward Turner On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 15:44, Erick Erickson wrote: > Have you explored edismax? > > > On Aug 11, 2020,

Re: Multiple "df" fields

e". e.g., q=id:value1 // hits id field, which uses the "simple" type q=value1 // hits content field, which uses the "complex" type ... so results might differ between the two queries I hope this clarifies our question? Best, Edd Edward Turner On T

Multiple "df" fields

Hi all, Is it possible to have multiple "df" fields? (We think the answer is no because our experiments did not work when adding multiple "df" values to solrconfig.xml -- but we just wanted to double check with those who know better.) The reason we would like to do this is that we have two main fi

Re: Solrcloud export all results sorted by score

Hi Chris, Good info, thank you for that! > What's your UI & middle layer like for this application and > eventual "download" ? I'm working in a team on the back-end side of things, where we providing a REST API that can be used by clients, which include our UI, which is a React JS based app with

Re: Solrcloud export all results sorted by score

= 150M. A key challenge for us is that in the life sciences, when more sequencing data comes in, it's possible for our data-sets to grow extremely quickly. Currently it doubles every 18 months or so (and today we have about 200M records, so not super big right now). Best, Edd --

Re: Solrcloud export all results sorted by score

ring docs evict lower scoring docs. > > So I think CursorMark is your best bet. > > Best, > Erick > > > On Oct 1, 2019, at 3:59 AM, Edward Turner wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > As far as I understand, SolrCloud currently does not allow the us

Solrcloud export all results sorted by score

Hi all, As far as I understand, SolrCloud currently does not allow the use of sorting by the pseudofield, score in the /export request handler (i.e., get the results in relevancy order). If we do attempt this, we get an exception, "org.apache.solr.search.SyntaxError: Scoring is not currently suppo