RE: SOLR 8.1.1 index on pdate field included in search results

2019-08-05 Thread Hodder, Rick
You are right of course, Shawn. I added useDocValuesAsStored="false" to the IDX_ExpirationDate field definition, and it no longer shows up Thanks, Rick -Original Message----- From: Hodder, Rick Sent: Monday, August 05, 2019 2:02 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE:

RE: SOLR 8.1.1 index on pdate field included in search results

2019-08-05 Thread Hodder, Rick
Hi Shawn, >The DatePointField class defaults to docValues="true" and >useDocValuesAsStored="true". Unless those parameters are changed, >if the field is defined for a document, it will typically be in search results. Just checking, I'm fine with ExpirationDate appearing in the results, it's th

SOLR 8.1.1 index on pdate field included in search results

2019-08-05 Thread Hodder, Rick
I am migrating from SOLR 4.10.2 to 8.1.1. For some reason, in the 8.1.1 core, a pdate index named IDX_ExpirationDate is appearing as a field in the search results documents. I have several other indexes that are defined and (correctly) do not appear in the results. But the index I am having trou

SOLR 8.1.1 SynonymQuery(Synonym in parsedQuery

2019-08-01 Thread Hodder, Rick
have a SOLR 4.10.2 core, and I am upgrading to 8.1.1. When I compare parsedQuery for a search 4.10 vs 8.1.1 I am seeing the query wrapped with SynonymQuery(Synonym( in 8.1.1. I think it may be because I replaced the deprecated SynonymFilterFactory with SynonymGraphFilterFactory. Is this a new fe

SOLR 8.1.1 EdgeNGramFilterFactory parsing query

2019-07-30 Thread Hodder, Rick
I have a SOLR 4.10.2 core, and I am upgrading to 8.1.1. I created an 8.1.1 core manually using the default_config set , and then brought over settings into the 8.1.1 schema I have adjusted the schema.xml and solrconfig.xml, and I have the core queryable in 8.1.1. I have a field named Company:

SOLR 7.1 ClassicSimilarityFactory Problem

2018-07-20 Thread Hodder, Rick
I am using SOLR 7.1 ClassicSimilarityFactory I have data in my core with field called CompanyName in an indexed field IDX_CompanyName Here are a few of the 900,000 rows in the core Cityview Citadel CivicVentures Clutch City Sports Clutch City Sports & Entertainment Clutch City Sports & Enter

Search not behaving as I expect

2018-07-17 Thread Hodder, Rick
I am using SOLR 7.1 ClassicSimilarityFactory I have data in my core with field called CompanyName in an indexed field IDX_CompanyName Here are a few of the 900,000 rows in the core Cityview Citadel CivicVentures Clutch City Sports Clutch City Sports & Entertainment Clutch City Sports & Ente

SOLR 7.1 Top level element for similarity factory

2018-07-16 Thread Hodder, Rick
I'm using SOLR 7.1 and I'm trying to set the similarity factory back to ClassicSimilarityFactory so that it will behave like SOLR 6 or before. In the document https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_1/other-schema-elements.html#similarity It says This default behavior can be overridden by decla

Confusing SOLR results after upgrading from 4.10 to 7.1

2018-04-30 Thread Hodder, Rick
I upgraded from SOLR 4.10 to SOLR 7.1 In the core, I have a string field called "company" and string field "year", and I have an index on company called IDX_Company. Here is the definition of the company field, and the definition of text_general in my schema in 4.10

SOLR Similarity Difference

2018-02-26 Thread Hodder, Rick
I'm converting SOLR 4.10.2 to SOLR 7.1 I have the following three strings in both SOLR cores Action Technical Temporaries t/a CTR Corporation Action Technical Temporaries Action Technical Temporar If I search IDX_CompanyName: (Action AND Technical AND Temporaries AND t/a AND CTR AND Corporatio

RE: SOLR Score Range Changed

2018-02-23 Thread Hodder, Rick
Classic Similarity helped, but the ranges of values don’t have a min near 0 like back in 4's version Are there other attributes/elements to this factory that could get me back the old functionality? -Original Message- From: Joël Trigalo [mailto:jtrig...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, Febru

RE: SOLR Score Range Changed

2018-02-23 Thread Hodder, Rick
Hi Shawn, Thanks for your help - I'm still finding my way in the weeds of SOLR. Combining everything into one query is what I'd prefer because as you said, one would think that with everything in the same query, the score would organize everything nicely. >>Assuming you're using the default re

SOLR Score Range Changed

2018-02-22 Thread Hodder, Rick
I am migrating from SOLR 4.10.2 to SOLR 7.1. All seems to be going well, except for one thing: the score that is coming back for the resulting documents is giving different scores. The core uses a schema. Here's the schema info for the field that i am searching on: When searching maxrows=75

RE: SOLR 7.1 queries not including empty fields in results

2018-01-30 Thread Hodder, Rick
Hi Chris, :Are you still using the same solrconfig.xml you had in 4.10, or did you switch to using a newer sample/default set (or in some other way modified) solrconfig.xml? :I ask because even if you are using the ClassicIndexSchemaFactory, your update processor chain might be using TrimFieldU

SOLR 7.1 queries not including empty fields in results

2018-01-24 Thread Hodder, Rick
I am converting a SOLR 4.10 db to SOLR 7.1 It is NOT schemaless - so it uses a ClassicIndexSchemaFactory. In 4.10, I have a field that is a phone number (here's the schema information for the field): When inserting documents into SOLR, there are some documents where the value of Phone is an