Michael Ludwig-4 wrote:
>
> MilkDud schrieb:
> What do you expect the user to enter?
>
> * "dream theater innocence faded" - certainly wrong
> * dream theater "innocence faded" - much better
>
> Most likely they would just enter dream theater innoc
ally, i'd like it to look at
each track individually and if the artist + just one track match all the
search terms, then that counts as a match. Does that make sense? If i
index on the track level, that should work, but then i have to store
album/artist info on each track.
Michael Ludwig
a valid
> opinion, but there's at least a chance that this is an XY problem
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:52 PM, MilkDud wrote:
>
>>
>> Yea, not using stopwords at all. I do have tracks specified in the pf
>> param
>> along with
have
separate documents at the track, artist, and album level) or having a field
that contains both the artist and track name concatenated, allowing for
phrase queries containing bother artist and track names.
Michael Ludwig-4 wrote:
>
> MilkDud schrieb:
>>
>> That part I understand
cGap that could word. But
then I lose the ability to search for artist and track name together.
-Jason
Michael Ludwig-4 wrote:
>
> MilkDud schrieb:
>
>> To be more specific, I'm indexing a collection of music albums that
>> have multiple tracks and an album artist. S
I'm trying to prevent a search from going across multiple values in a
multivalued field and am running into an issue. From what I've read, the
standard way to do this is with a positionIncrementGap that is larger than
the ps value. However, I can't make this a phrase query because there is
anoth
