Please let me know about your conclusion ?
i am also in same confusion.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Dorian Hoxha
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see that there is a new release on every lucene release. Do you always
> use the latest version since it may have bugs (ex most
acking up & deleting current index from dataDir.
> Also note that, adding docValue=true would increase size of index.
>
> 2)>Each node memory parameter : -Xms2g, -Xmx4g
> What is the basis choosing above memory sizes? Have you observed through
> jconsole or visual vm?
>
Cluster details :
Solr Version : solr-4.10.4
No of nodes : 2 each 16 GB RAM
Node of shards : 2
Replication : 1
Each node memory parameter : -Xms2g, -Xmx4g
Collection details :
No of docs in my collection : 12.31 million
Indexed field per document : 2
Unique key field : tids
Stored filed per
Requesting Solr experts again to suggest some solutions to my above problem
as i am not able to solve this.
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Naresh Yadav nyadav@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Andrew, You got my problem precisely But solutions you suggested
may not work for me.
In my API i get
Hi all,
Also asked this here : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30166116
For example i have SOLR docs in which tags field is indexed :
Doc1 - tags:T1 T2
Doc2 - tags:T1 T3
Doc3 - tags:T1 T4
Doc4 - tags:T1 T2 T3
Query1 : get all docs with tags:T1 AND tags:T3 then it works and will
give Doc2
one), ie:
tags:T1 tags:T2 tags:T3
-sujit
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Naresh Yadav nyadav@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Also asked this here : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30166116
For example i have SOLR docs in which tags field is indexed :
Doc1 - tags:T1 T2
Doc2
Setup1 i.e 2 minutes.
Actually first 50 thousand request it self is taking about a minute. May be
i would need to see other things as pagination seems working better now.
thanks for giving valuable suggestions.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Naresh Yadav nyadav@gmail.com wrote:
Toke
it to id last_id and get the first 50k docs (don't
use start= for paging). This scales much better when scanning a large
result set; you'll get constant time across the whole set instead of having
it increase as you page deeper.
-Mike
On 1/18/2015 7:45 AM, Naresh Yadav wrote:
Hi Toke
units in post.
Thanks
Naresh
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Toke Eskildsen t...@statsbiblioteket.dk
wrote:
Naresh Yadav [nyadav@gmail.com] wrote:
In both setups, we are reading in batches of 50k and each batch taking
Setup1 : approx 7 seconds and for completing all batches of total 10
batch size also 10k, 1lakh but no gain in total time taken
in Setup2.
Thanks
Naresh
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Andrew Butkus
andrew.but...@c6-intelligence.com wrote:
shard.info=true
Sent from my iPhone
On 17 Jan 2015, at 04:23, Naresh Yadav nyadav@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
with
keyword tokenizer.
Ahmet
On Friday, January 16, 2015 4:43 AM, Naresh Yadav nyadav@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi ahmet,
If you observe output ngroups is 1 and returning only one group P1.
But my expectation is it should return three groups P1, L1, L2 as my
field is tokenized with space.
Please
easy with facet component. Example :
facet=truefacet.field=tenant_poolq=type:1
Please see more here :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Faceting
happy faceting,
ahmet
On Friday, January 16, 2015 10:13 AM, Naresh Yadav nyadav@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi ahmet,
Thanks, now i
faceting.
Faceting used all over the place and it is fast. I suggest you looks for
faceting improvements.
Ahmet
On Friday, January 16, 2015 11:17 AM, Naresh Yadav nyadav@gmail.com
wrote:
I tried facetting also but not worked smoothly for me. Case i had mentioned
in email is dummy one and my
Hi all,
We have single solr index with 3 fixed fields(on of field is tokenized with
space) and rest dynamic fields(string fields in range of 10-20).
Current size of index is 2 GB with around 12 lakh docs and solr
nodes are of 4 core, 16 gb ram linux machines.
Writes performance is good then we
looks correct, what is the problem here?
If you want to see more than one document per group, there is a parameter
for that which defaults to 1.
Ahmet
On Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:02 AM, Naresh Yadav nyadav@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I had done following configuration to test Solr
Hi all,
I had done following configuration to test Solr grouping concept.
solr version : 4.6.1 (tried in latest version 4.10.3 also)
Schema : http://www.imagesup.net/?di=10142124357616
Solrj code to insert docs :http://www.imagesup.net/?di=10142124381116
Response Group's :
as my problem is changed completely from first post so i had created new
thread for that.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Naresh Yadav nyadav@gmail.com wrote:
just wanted to share schema and results for same :
solr version : 4.6.1
Schema : http://www.imagesup.net/?di=10142124357616
Please help me on this problem where no of groups are not matching with no
of terms which is expected behaviour acc to me.
Please give direction on this problem.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Naresh Yadav nyadav@gmail.com wrote:
I tried what you said also appended group.ngroups=true
that
should help.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Naresh Yadav nyadav@gmail.com
wrote:
Erick, my schema is same no change in that..
*Schema :*
field name=tenant_pool type=text stored=true/
my guess is i had not mentioned indexed true or falsemay be default
I tried what you said also appended group.ngroups=true and got same result
not expected onengroups coming is 1.
i am on solr-4.6.1 single machine default setup.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Norgorn lsunnyd...@mail.ru wrote:
Can u get raw SOLR response?
For me grouping works exactly
*Schema :*
field name=tenant_pool type=text stored=true/
*Code :*
SolrQuery q = new SolrQuery().setQuery(*:*);
q.set(GroupParams.GROUP, true);
q.set(GroupParams.GROUP_FIELD, tenant_pool);
*Data :*
tenant_pool : Baroda Farms
tenant_pool : Ketty Farms
*Output coming :*
groupValue=Farms, docs=2
, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Naresh Yadav nyadav@gmail.com
wrote:
*Schema :*
field name=tenant_pool type=text stored=true/
*Code :*
SolrQuery q = new SolrQuery().setQuery(*:*);
q.set(GroupParams.GROUP, true);
q.set(GroupParams.GROUP_FIELD, tenant_pool);
*Data :*
tenant_pool : Baroda
by making the field you
want
to group on be
stored=false indexed=true type=string
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Naresh Yadav nyadav@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi jack,
Thanks for replying, i am new to solr please guide me on this. I have
many
such columns in my schema
so
23 matches
Mail list logo