Feb 20, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> He could also just escape it or am i missing something?
>
>> --- On Sun, 2/20/11, Paul Tomblin wrote:
>> > From: Paul Tomblin
>> > Subject: Re: How to get a field that starts with a minus?
>> > To: solr
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> I have a field in my database, "id", which is the unique key. The id
> is generated as an MD5 hash of some of the other data in the record,
> and unfortunately the way I converted it to hex meant that sometimes I
>
dfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d
>
> query.setQuery("{!raw f=id}-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d");
>
>
>
> --- On Sun, 2/20/11, Paul Tomblin wrote:
>
>> From: Paul Tomblin
>> Subject: How to get a field that starts with a minus?
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
I have a field in my database, "id", which is the unique key. The id
is generated as an MD5 hash of some of the other data in the record,
and unfortunately the way I converted it to hex meant that sometimes I
get a negative value. I'm having a real hard time figuring out the
right combination of
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> ... curl http://xen1.xcski.com:8080/solrChunk/nutch/select
>
> that should be /update, not /select
Ah, that seems to have fixed it. Thanks.
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin
http://careers.stackoverflow.com/ptomblin
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> > I have a schema with a field name "category" ( > type="string" stored="true" indexed="true"/>). I'm trying to dele
I have a schema with a field name "category" (). I'm trying to delete
everything with a certain value of category with curl:
I send:
curl http://localhost:8080/solrChunk/nutch/update -H "Content-Type:
text/xml" --data-binary 'category:Banks'
Response is:
023
I send
curl http://localhost:8
m up at the same time. Do you use any warming
> queries, or have large caches?
>
> Thanks for your time!
>
> Matthew Runo
> Software Engineer, Zappos.com
> mr...@zappos.com - 702-943-7833
>
> On Nov 27, 2009, at 5:46 AM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
>
>> NFO: start
>&
NFO: start
commit(optimize=false,waitFlush=true,waitSearcher=true,expungeDeletes=false)
Nov 27, 2009 3:45:35 AM
org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor finish
INFO: {} 0 634
Nov 27, 2009 3:45:35 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore getSearcher
WARNING: [nutch] Error opening new searcher. e
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
>>
>> I was doing it that way, but what I'm doing with the documents is do
>> some manipulation and put the new classes into a different list.
>> Because I basically have two times the number of documents in lists,
>> I'm running out of memory.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
>>
>> final static int MAX_ROWS = 100;
>> int start = 0;
>> query.setRows(MAX_ROWS);
>> while (true)
>> {
>> QueryResponse resp = solrChunkServer.query(query);
>> SolrDocumentList docs = resp.getResults();
>> if (docs.size() == 0)
>> br
If I want to do a query and only return X number of rows at a time,
but I want to keep querying until I get all the row, how do I do that?
Can I just keep advancing query.setStart(...) and then checking if
server.query(query) returns any rows? Or is there a better way?
Here's what I'm thinking
In an earlier message, Yonik suggested that I use omitNorms="true" if
I wanted the length of the document to not be counted in the scoring.
The documentation also mentions that it omits "index-time boosting".
What does that mean?
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin
http://careers.stackoverf
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> I personally think it would be cleaner to allow a post of just a
> (or multiple with a surrounding tag), esp now that we can put
> modifiers in the URL.
Exactly. The action should be in the url.
>
> For now, just use shell scripting I gue
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
>> I was looking at the script in example/exampledocs to feed documents
>> to the server.
>>
>> Just to see if it was possible, I took one of the documents that I'v
I was looking at the script in example/exampledocs to feed documents
to the server.
Just to see if it was possible, I took one of the documents that I've
previously indexed using SolrJ, and I tried to feed it directly to the
Solr server using the following command:
curl http://localhost:8697/solr
:48 AM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
>> Am I right in thinking that a document that the sortable field is only
>> two sentences long and contains the search term once will score higher
>> than one that is 50 sentences long that contains the search term 4
>> times?
>
> Yep. Assu
Am I right in thinking that a document that the sortable field is only
two sentences long and contains the search term once will score higher
than one that is 50 sentences long that contains the search term 4
times? Is there a way to change it to score higher based only on
number of hits?
--
ht
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> Can you try this with the Solrj client
> in the official 1.3 release or even trunk?
I did a svn update to 821188 and that seems to have fixed the problem.
(The jar files changed from -1.3.0 to -1.4-dev) I guess it's been
longer sinc
09 AM, Paul Tomblin <ptomb...@xcski.com> wrote:
> >>
> > Nope. Check again. getNumFound will definitely give you 1251.
> > SolrDocumentList#size() will give you 10.
>
> I don't have to check again. I put this log into my query code:
>Qu
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
>
>> Nope, that just gets you the number of results returned, not how many
>> there could be. Like I said, if you look at the XML returned, you'll
>>
tResults()#getNumFound()
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
>> When I do a query directly form the web, the XML of the response
>> includes how many results would have been returned if it hadn't
>> restricted itself to the first 10 rows:
&
When I do a query directly form the web, the XML of the response
includes how many results would have been returned if it hadn't
restricted itself to the first 10 rows:
For instance, the query:
http://localhost:8080/solrChunk/nutch/select/?q=*:*&fq=category:mysites
returns:
0
0
*:*
category:mys
Sorry, in my last question I meant setRows not setMaxRows. Whay do I pass to
setRows to get all matches, not just the first 10?
-- Sent from my Palm Prē
Sorry about asking this here, but I can't reach wiki.apache.org right now.
What do I set in query.setMaxRows() to get all the rows?
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> Set hl.usePhraseHighlighter parameter to true:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.usePhraseHighlighter
>
>
That seems to have done it. Thanks.
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin
If I do a query for a couple of words in quotes, Solr correctly only returns
pages where those words appear exactly within the quotes. But the
highlighting acts as if the words were given separately, and stems them and
everything. For example, if I search for "knee pain", it returns a document
th
Thanks to Jay, I have my code doing what I need it to do. If anybody
cares, this is my code:
SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery();
query.setQuery(searchTerm);
query.addFilterQuery(Chunk.SOLR_KEY_CONCEPT + ":" + concept);
query.addFilterQuery(Chunk.SOLR_KEY_CATEGORY +
w to set highlighting
> params and how to get back a List of highlighting results.
>
> -Jay
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
>
>> If I set snippets to 9 and "mergeContinuous" to true, will I get
&
List highightSnippets =
> queryResponse.getHighlighting().get(id).get("content");
> }
> }
>
> Hope that gets you what you need.
>
> -Jay
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
>
>> Can s
Can somebody point me to some sample code for using highlighting in
SolrJ? I understand the highlighted versions of the field comes in a
separate NamedList? How does that work?
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:07 PM, AHMET ARSLAN wrote:
> --- On Wed, 9/9/09, Paul Tomblin wrote:
>> SEVERE: org.apache.lucene.queryParser.ParseException:
>> Cannot parse
>> 'url:http\:\/\/xcski\.com\/pharma\/&fq=category:pharma':
>
>> Should
I'm trying to delete using SolJ's "deleteByQuery", but it doesn't like
it that I've added an "fq" parameter. Here's what I see in the logs:
Sep 9, 2009 1:46:13 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.lucene.queryParser.ParseException: Cannot parse
'url:http\:\/\/xcski\.com\
Every document I put into Solr has a field "origScore" which is a
floating point number between 0 and 1 that represents a score assigned
by the program that generated the document. I would like it that when
I do a query, it uses that origScore in the scoring, perhaps
multiplying the Solr score to
Slightly off topic, but I'm getting tired of hitting the 'view source' keyboard
shortcut every time I do a solr query. Is there a way to make Safari display
xml as-is?
-- Sent from my Palm Prē
I'm trying to instantiate multiple cores. Since nothing is different
between the two cores except the schema and the data dir, I was hoping
to share the same instanceDir. Solr seems to recognize that there are
two cores, and gives me two different admin pages. But unfortunately
both the admin pa
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Israel Ekpo wrote:
> Is the Solr wiki down?
>
There's a very useful web page for these questions:
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/
It confirms that yes, the wiki is down. I'm currently using the
Google cache to read the pages I need.
--
http://www.linkedin.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> Say you have an embedded solr server and an http solr server pointed to the
> same location.
> 1. make sure only is read only! otherwise you can make a mess.
> 2. calling commit on the embedded solr instance, will not have any effect on
> t
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Chantal
Ackermann wrote:
> Paul Tomblin schrieb:
>> The conf file says:
>> ${solr.data.dir:./solr/data}
>> That indicates to me that there is some way to override that default
>> ./solr/data involving something called solr.data.dir, bu
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Shalin Shekhar
Mangar wrote:
>> Ok, I've spotted the problem - while SolrHome is in the right place,
>> it's still looking for the data in
>> /Users/ptomblin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20/solr/data/
>>
>> How can I changed that?
>>
>>
> One easy way is to hard code that loca
Yesterday or the day before, I asked specifically if I would need to
restart the Solr server if somebody else loaded data into the Solr
index using the EmbeddedServer, and I was told confidently that no,
the Solr server would see the new data as soon as it was committed.
So today I fired up the Sol
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
>>cwd=/Users/ptomblin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20
>>SolrHome=/Users/ptomblin/src/lucidity/solr/
>
Ok, I've spotted the problem - while SolrHome is in the right place,
it's still looking for the data in
/Users/ptomblin/apach
I've loaded some data into my solr using the embedded server, and I
can see the data using Luke. I start up the web app, and it says
>cwd=/Users/ptomblin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20
>SolrHome=/Users/ptomblin/src/lucidity/solr/
I hit the "schema" button and it shows the correct schema. However,
if I t
Can I get all the distinct values from the Solr "database", or do I
have to select everything and aggregate it myself?
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Eric
Pugh wrote:
> You can just query Solr, find the records that you want (including all
> the website data). Update them, and then send the entire record back.
>
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you'd end up losing the fields
that are indexed but not stored.
Is Solr like a RDBMS in that I can have multiple programs querying and
updating the index at once, and everybody else will see the updates
after a commit, or do I have to something explicit to see others
updates? Does it matter whether they're using the web interface,
SolrJ with a
CommonsHttpSolrS
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Andrew Clegg wrote:
> Paul Tomblin wrote:
>>
>> Is there such a thing as a wildcard search? If I have a simple
>> solr.StrField with no analyzer defined, can I query for "foo*" or
>> "foo.*" and get everyth
Is there such a thing as a wildcard search? If I have a simple
solr.StrField with no analyzer defined, can I query for "foo*" or
"foo.*" and get everything that starts with "foo" such as 'foobar" and
"foobaz"?
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
> Most probably Ctrl-C is graceful for Tomcat, and kill -9 too... Tomcat is
> smart... I prefer "/etc/init.d/my_tomcat" wrapper around catalina.sh ("su
> tomcat", /var/lock etc...) - ok then, Graceful Shutdown depends on how you
> started Tomcat.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Marco Westermann wrote:
> exactly! for example you could create a field called "all". And you copy
> your fields to it, which should be searched, when all fields are searched.
>
Awesome, that worked great. I made my "all" field 'stored="false"
indexed="true"' and
So if I want to make it so that the default search always searches
three specific fields, I can make another field multi-valued that they
are all copied into?
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Marco Westermann wrote:
> I would say, you should use the copyField tag in the schema. eg:
>
>
>
> the t
I've got "text" and so if I
do an unqualified search it only finds in the field text. If I want
to search title, I can do "title:foo", but what if I want to find if
the search term is in any field, or if it's in "text" or "title" or
"concept" or "keywords"? I already tried "*:foo", but that throw
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> Hmmm. It's not working right. I've added a 5 documents, 3 with the
> URL set to "http://xcski.com/pharma/"; and 2 with the URL set to
> "http://xcski.com/nano/";. Doing other sorts of queries seems to
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Ensdorf Ken wrote:
>> Does this mean I should have converted my objects to string before
>> writing them to the server?
>>
>
> I believe SolrJ takes care of that for you by calling toString(), but you
> would need to convert explicitly when you query (and then esca
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Ensdorf Ken wrote:
> You can escape the string with
>
> org.apache.lucene.queryParser.QueryParser.escape(String query)
>
> http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/api/org/apache/lucene/queryParser/QueryParser.html#escape%28java.lang.String%29
>
Does this mean I should
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-SC)[PEROT
SYSTEMS] wrote:
> Assuming you have written the SolrInputDocument to the server, you would next
> query.
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean by "you would next query."
There appear to be some words missing from that sente
If I put an object into a SolrInputDocument and store it, how do I
query for it back? For instance, I stored a java.net.URI in a field
called "url", and I want to query for all the documents that match a
particular URI. The query syntax only seems to allow Strings, and if
I just try query.setQuer
Which versions of Lucene, Nutch and Solr work together? I've
discovered that the Nutch trunk and the Solr trunk use wildly
different versions of the Lucene jars, and it's causing me problems.
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin
I don't want to join yet another mailing list or register for JIRA,
but I just noticed that the Javadocs for
SolrInputDocument.addField(String name, Object value, float boost) is
incredibly wrong - it looks like it was copied from a "deleteAll"
method.
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin
59 matches
Mail list logo
