Re: `cat /dev/null > solr-8983-console.log` frees host's memory

This details in this link[1] might be of help. [1]https://support.lucidworks.com/hc/en-us/articles/207072137 On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Emir Arnautovic < emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote: > Hi Eric, > As Shawn explained, memory is freed because it was used to cache portion > of log file

Re: Apache Solr SpellChecker Integration with the default select request handler

The attached exception seems to be stripped off. Anyways, >>I want to integrate spellcheck handler with default select handler. Please guide me how can I achieve this. If you were unable to follow the steps mentioned on reference guide[2], here is another link[1] that gives same but quick setup

Re: Stable Versions in Solr 4

Solr 4.10.3 On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Binoy Dalal wrote: > You should take a look at solr's jira. > That'll give you a pretty good idea of the various feature upgrades across > versions as well as the bugs present in the various versions. > > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015, 17:42 abhi Abhishek wrot

Re: Proximity Search

Hi Vijaya, I just quickly tried proximity search with the example set shipped with solr 5 and it looked like working for me. Perhaps, what you could is debug the query by enabling debugQuery=true. Here are the steps that I tried.(Assuming you are on Solr 5. Though this term proximity functionali

Re: A Synonym Searching for Phrase?

Hi Ryan, I am not really sure whether this[1] solution mentioned in the link below can work for your case considering its cons. However, I recommend having a quick look at it. @Chris, Would eagerly wait for your contribution. [1] https://support.lucidworks.com/hc/en-us/articles/205359448 On

Re: sort on fields that are not mandatory in each document

Hi Derek, They are at the fieldType Level. You might find some reference examples in schema.xml using them. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Field+Type+Definitions+and+Properties On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Derek Poh wrote: > Hi Ahmet > > The sortMissingLast and sortMissin

Re: import solr source to eclipse

Hi, The best tutorial for setting up Solr[solr 4.7] in eclipse/intellij is documented in Solr In Action book, Apendix A, *Working with the Solr codebase* On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe < tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote: > The way I do this: > From a terminal: > svn checkou

Re: import solr source to eclipse

at 12:06 PM, Ali Nazemian wrote: > Thank you very much for your guides but how can I run solr server inside > eclipse? > Best regards. > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Rajani Maski > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The best tutorial for setting up

Re: Solr Synonyms, Escape space in case of multi words

Hi David, I think you should have the filter class with tokenizer specified. [As shown below] * So your field type should be as shown below: On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:25 PM, David Philip wrote: > Sorry, analysis page clip is getting trimmed off an

Re: Dynamic fields - names having special characters like ">" "<"

Hi all, I found a solution myself - to replace - < > with < and > Thanks & Regards Rajani On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Rajani Maski wrote: > Hi all, > > We have few *dynamic field names* coming with special character. ex: * &

Grouping results - set document return count not group.limit

Hi all, Is there any parameter which will set the number of document returned after applying grouping on results? Like we have query.setRows for results without grouping? I know all the below functions will set to group param. But this will not limit number of document returned. We want to

Re: Grouping results - set document return count not group.limit

We solved this > by using Solr 4.0 with a patch from JIRA ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1093) which allowed execution > of > multiple queries in parallel threads along with a few enhancements that > have not been made public yet by the company I work for. > > On

Solr Optimization Fail

Hi, When we do optimize, it actually reduces the data size right? I have index of size 6gb(5 million documents). Index is already created with commits for every 1 documents. Now I was trying to do optimization with http optimize command. When i did that, data size became - 12gb. Why th

Re: Solr Optimization Fail

onfig.xml > > ____ > De: Rajani Maski [rajinima...@gmail.com] > Enviado el: viernes, 16 de diciembre de 2011 11:11 > Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Asunto: Solr Optimization Fail > > Hi, > > When we do optimize, it actually reduces the data size right?

Re: Solr Optimization Fail

snapshot of your index attached to the > optimize > > ??? > > Look for post-commit or post-optimize events in your solr-config.xml > > > > > > De: Rajani Maski [rajinima...@gmail.com] > > Enviado el: viernes, 16 de d

Re: Chinese language search in SOLR 3.6.1

Hi Poornima, Your statement : "It works fine with the chinese strings but not working with product code or ISBN even though the fields are defined as string" is confusing. Did you mean that the product code and ISBN fields are of type text_Chinese? Is it first or second: or What do you r

Re: Chinese language search in SOLR 3.6.1

but doesn't work if I > search with q=simple:676767667. If the field is defined as string the > chinese character works but doesn't work if it is defined as text_chinese. > > Regards, > Poornima > > > > > On Tuesday, 22 October 2013 7:52 PM, Rajani Maski &

Re: character encoding issue...

Hi, If you are using Apache Tomcat Server, hope you are not missing the below mentioned configuration: I had faced similar issue with Chinese Characters and had resolved with the above config. Links for reference : http://zensarteam.wordpress.com/2011/11/25/6-steps-to-configure-solr-on-apa

Re: Replacing Google Mini Search Appliance with Solr?

Hi Eric, I have also developed mini-applications replacing GSA for some of our clients using Apache Nutch + Solr to crawl multi lingual sites and enable multi-lingual search. Nutch+Solr is very stable and Nutch mailing list provides a good support. Reference link to start: https://sites.google.

Re: character encoding issue...

ess/20130926/c26alibaba/ > > All text in title comes like - > > - � > > > - > � > > > > Can you please advice? > > Chris > > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Rajani Maski >wrote: >

Re: Document Security Model Question

Hi, For the case: *"it requires *constant reindexing if a value in this field changes" If the acl for documents keep changing, Solr PostFilter is one of the option. We use it in our system. We have almost near to billion documents and 5000 approx users. But it is important to check whether the

Trouble handling Unit symbol

Hi, We have data having such symbols like : µ Indexed data has -Dose:"0 µL" Language type - "English" Now , when it is searched as - Dose:"0 µL" Number of document matched = 0 Query Q value observed : S257:"0 µL/injection" *Any solution to handle such cases? * Thanks & Regards

Re: Trouble handling Unit symbol

Thank you for the reply. On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : We have data having such symbols like : ? > : Indexed data has -Dose:"0 ?L" > : Now , when it is searched as - Dose:"0 ?L" >... > : Query Q value observed : S257:"0 ??L/injection" > > First o

Re: Trouble handling Unit symbol

above document is found.* Thanks & Regards Regards Rajani 2012/4/2 Rajani Maski > Thank you for the reply. > > > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Chris Hostetter > wrote: > >> >> : We have data having such symbols like : ต >> : Indexed data h

Re: Trouble handling Unit symbol

guess at solutions without providing much > in the way of context. > > You might try looking at your index with Luke to > see what's actually in your index, or perhaps > TermsComponent > > > Best > Erick > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Rajani Maski > wrote: >

Facet on all the dynamic fields with *_s feature

Hi All, Is this issue fixed in solr 3.6 or 4.0: Faceting on all Dynamic field with facet.field=*_s Link : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-247 If it is not fixed, any suggestion on how do I achieve this? My requirement is just same as this one : http://lucene.472066.n3.n

Re: Facet on all the dynamic fields with *_s feature

in proposed features. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: Rajani Maski > Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 12:02 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Facet on all the dynamic fields with *_s feature > > > Hi All, > > Is this issue fixed

Re: Facet on all the dynamic fields with *_s feature

Darren Govoni wrote: > You'll have to query the index for the fields and sift out the _s ones > and cache them or something. > > On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 16:52 +0530, Rajani Maski wrote: > > > Yes, This feature will solve the below problem very neatly. > > > >

Re: Facet on all the dynamic fields with *_s feature

Hi Users, Any reply for the query below? On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Rajani Maski wrote: > In this URL - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-247 > > there are *patches *and one patch with name "*SOLR-247-FacetAllFields*" > > Will that help me to fix

Significance of Analyzer Class attribute

Hi, What is the significance of Analyzer class attribute? When I specify analyzer class in schema, something like below and do analysis on this field in analysis page : I cant see verbose output on tokenizer and filters *But if i don't add analyzer class, I can see t

Re: Significance of Analyzer Class attribute

Hi All, Thank you for the replies. --Regards Rajani On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : > When I specify analyzer class in schema, something > : > like below and do > : > analysis on this field in analysis page : I cant see > : > verbose output on > : > tokenize

Re: Autocomplete terms from the middle of name/description of a Doc

Hi, One approach for this can be to get fact.prefix results for prefix based suggests and for suggesting names from middle of doc what you can do is index that name field with white space and edge ngram filter; search on that field with prefix key word and fl=title only.. Then concatenate both

split on white space and then EdgeNGramFilterFactory

Hi, I wanted to do split on white space and then apply EdgeNGramFilterFactory. Example : A field in a document has text content : "smart phone, i24 xpress exchange offer, 500 dollars" smart s sm sma smar smart phone p ph pho phon phone i24 i i2 i24 xpress x xp xpr xpre xpres xpress so on...

Re: split on white space and then EdgeNGramFilterFactory

Lucene query is > generated. > > And, use the Solr admin analyzer to validate both index-time and > query-time analysis of your terms. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: Rajani Maski > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 7:26 AM > To: solr-user@luc

Re: Adding new field before import- using post.jar

cally get those values when added. Take the > default value attributes out of the schema once you have input documents > that actually have the new field values. > > 5. Hire a consultant. > > > > -- Jack Krupansky > > > > -Original Message- From: Rajan

Re: Adding new field before import- using post.jar

ent, how will you be accessing > the three field values to add? > > This may guide the approach that you could/should take. > > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: Rajani Maski > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 5:37 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.o

Paoding analyzer with solr for chinese

Hi All, As said in this blog site that paoding analyzer is much better for chinese text, I was trying to implement it to get accurate results for chinese text. I followed the instruction specified in the below sites Site1

Re: Paoding analyzer with solr for chinese

Hi All, Any reply on this? On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Rajani Maski wrote: > Hi All, > > As said in this blog > site<http://java.dzone.com/articles/indexing-chinese-solr> that paoding > analyzer is much better for chinese text, I was trying to implement it to &

Chinese character not encoded for facet.prefix but encoded for q field

Chinese character not encoded for facet.prefix but encoded for q field - BODY * * *why?what might be the problem?* This is done : [image: Inline image 2]

Prefix (facet.prefix) based auto-suggest on Multi-Valued field do not return results

Hi All, * When I do facet.prefix on a * KEYWORDS *field(this field is multi valued) , I don't get suggestion for the first key in this field . * Example : I have 2 documents with the field "KEYWORDS" containing multiple values. 偏振式3D成像原理 采用LED边缘发光的新技术 高级降噪运算法及画质增强技术可 紧凑机身，轻松携带 节能低耗，持久续航

Re: Prefix (facet.prefix) based auto-suggest on Multi-Valued field do not return results

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Rajani Maski wrote: > Hi All, > > * When I do facet.prefix on a * KEYWORDS *field(this field is multi > valued) , I don't get suggestion for the first key in this field . * > > Example : > > I have 2 documents with the field "

Get report of keywords searched.

Hi All, I am using solrJ. When there is search query hit, I am logging the url in a location and also it is getting logged into tomcat catalina logs. Now I wanted to implement a functionality of periodically(per week) analyzing search logs of solr and find out the keywords searched. Is there a

Re: Get report of keywords searched.

em for the > keywards: > > 1) apple OR orange > 2) apple AND orange > 3) title:apple AND subject:orange > 4) apple -orange > 5) apple OR (orange AND banana) > 6) title:apple OR subject:orange > > Ciao > > Davide Marino > > > > > > > > > 201

Re: Get report of keywords searched.

> > 1 - Make the call to update the db in a different thread > 2 - Make an asynchronous http call to a web application that update the db > (in this case the web app can be resident in a different machine, so the > ram, cpu time and disk operations don't slow your solr engi

Re: Get report of keywords searched.

Regards > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Rajani Maski > wrote: > > > Hi Davide, Yes right. This can be done. > > > > Just one question, I am not sure if I had to create new thread for > > this question, Just wanted to know whether solrmeter or jmeter