for splitting tokens into our
words appropriately.
Thanks to everyone for helping.
Regards,
Sohail Aboobaker.
Hi,
After further analysis it was found that the cases in which the search
works as expected are where the . is preceded by a number. Whenever, we
have an alphabet instead of number, the search on the word on right side
doesn't return results.
SA8182B.BA0850 -- Will have issues when searching
Sorry, a correction. The first part doesn't give results.
SA8182B.BA0850 -- Will have issues when searching on SA8182 -- no
results. searching on BA0850 will give results.
SA8182.BA0850 -- No issues will return results for BA0850 and SA8182.
Regards,
Sohail
Yes, that is true. We are looking for partial word matches. It seems like
we can achieve this by using edge ngram for prefixes and adding wild card
at the end for ignoring suffix. If we set the edge ngram to 3. eng will
match ResidentEng but not ResidentEngineer. But a search for eng* will
match
*). Is it possible to have
wild card on both sides of a search term?
Regards,
Sohail Aboobaker.
Thanks Jack.
In the configuration below:
fieldType name=text_edgngrm class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer
tokenizer class=solr.EdgeNGramTokenizerFactory side=front
minGramSize=1 maxGramSize=1/
/analyzer
/fieldType
What are the possible values for side?
If I
We have auto commit on and will basically send it in a loop after
validating each record, we send it to search service. And keep doing it in
a loop. Mikhail / Lan, are you suggesting that instead of sending it in a
loop, we should collect them in an array and do a commit at the end? Is
this better
We will be using Solr 3.x version. I was wondering if we do need to worry
about this as we have only 10k index entries at a time. It sounds like a
very low number and we have only document type at this point.
Should we worry about directly using SolrJ for indexing and searching for
this low
Thanks. That is what we concluded i.e. to write a wrapper method within our
service to build the query for Solr by examining the example bean.
Thanks again.
Hi,
Is there a way to search by providing an example document to solr? We would
set the fields of the example document to desired filter and ask Solr to
bring all documents that match this example document. For example, if our
document contains itemnumber, title, sku, price etc. Is it possible to
Thanks,
I will look into more like this. To answer your question, we were
discussing interface for a central search service that all other components
can call. We have to provide a set of parameters as interface which clients
can set and ask for results. This would mean that name of each
Hi,
Congratulations on Alpha release. I am wondering is there a ball park on
final release for 4.0? Is it expected in August or Sep time frame or is it
further away? We badly need some features included in this release. These
are around grouped facet counts. We have limited use for Solr in our
Hi,
We have defined a unique key as schemaid. We add documents using
server.addBean(obj) method. We are using the same method for updates as
well. When browsing the schema, we see that some of the schemaid values
have frequency of more than 1. Since, schemaid column is defined as unique
key, we
We have defined the schemaid as String. It has concatenated value of the
product id and language. It takes the form of ID-EN. For example:
'123012-EN', '124020-EN', '12392-FR'.
Sohail
Another observation is that when we query an individual schemaid, it
returns only one row using the search interface. Why would frequency be
more than 1?
In many e-commerce sites, most of data that we display (except images)
especially in grids and lists is minimal. We were inclined to use Solr as
data store for only displaying the information in grids. We stopped only
due to non-availability of joins in Solr3.5. Since, our data (like any
other
Thanks Eric,
This is indeed what we are seeing. I hope we can just ignore the
frequencies. Does it in any way effect facet counts for such records?
Sohail
Hi,
We have a schema that contains categories (multi valued) for different
levels. Each level of categories are indexed in a different field. Each
category entry contains its parent in its value. The level is separated by
a | symbol. We are seeing following results for a faceted query:
Never mind, I figured it out after sending the email:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=level2categories:%22Artists\|Direct%20from%20the%20Artist%22group=truegroup.field=groupbygroup.main=truefacet=truegroup.facet=truefacet.field=level1categoriesfacet.field=level2categoriesrows=0
I needed to
Hi,
I have a very basic question and hopefully there is a simple answer to
this. We are trying to index a simple product catalog which has a master
product and child products. Each master product can have multiple child
products. A master product can be assigned one or more product categories.
Thank you for quick replies.
Can't the ID (uniqueKey) of the indexed documents (i.e. denormalized data)
be a combination of the master product id and the child product id ?
-- We do not need it as each child is already a unique key.
Therefore whenever you update your master product db entry,
We are still in design phase, so we haven't hit any performance issues. We
do not want to discover performance issues too late during QA :) We would
rather account for any issues during the design phase.
The refresh rate on fields that we are using from master table will be
rare. May be three or
It would help if you provide your use case. What are you indexing for each
user and why would you need a separate core for indexing each user? How do
you decide schema for each user? It might be better to describe your use
case and desired results. People on the list will be able to advice on the
Is it available in Solr 3.5 or is there a way to do something similar in
Solr 3.5,
I think regular sync of database table with synonym text file seems to be
simplest of the solutions. It will allow you to use Solr natively without
any customization and it is not very complicated operation to update
synonyms file with entries in database.
I had copied the full example directory. After copying, I had replaced
schema.xml from my old 3.5 schema.xml and I faced this error. After Eric's
email, I copied stopwords_en.txt into conf directory of my copy. It works
fine after that.
After seeing your email, it seems that the better approach
I am new to Solr as well but based on what I have read so far, once you
have created index in Solr, you should look at ajax-solr. It provides a
good example to type ahead widget (show list as you type).
Sohail
Never mind, I did not notice that this is coming in Solr 4.0. Any
ideas on when Solr 4.0 will be out?
Sohail
Hi,
Is there a searchable archive for solr user emails available somewhere
to avoid questions already asked on list?
Sohail
Hi,
I am trying nightly build for solr 4.0. I downloaded the build and am
able to start it. In 3.x, I copied the example directory and updated
the schema.xml. It worked fine but in 4.0, I did the same thing (make
a copy of example) but when I change the schema, I get following:
Apr 26, 2012
30 matches
Mail list logo
