Hi All,
I use value source parser to load external file that contains popularity
values.
The way I use it is by passing a "signals" param in the query now I want
to warm up this external cache in solr before the actual traffic starts
coming in.
What is happening is that the cache does not get
with the update log. used when applying reordered DBQ
updates when doing an add.
So the flag =2 is actually saying that the update command is from
replaying a log ( which is what you would expect)
Cheers
2015-07-08 3:01 GMT+01:00 Summer Shire shiresum...@gmail.com:
Hi,
When I restart my
along with the hard
commit.
-Yonik
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Summer Shire shiresum...@gmail.com wrote:
HI All,
Can someone help me understand the following behavior.
I have the following maxTimes on hard and soft commits
yet I see a lot of Opening Searchers in the log
HI All,
Can someone help me understand the following behavior.
I have the following maxTimes on hard and soft commits
yet I see a lot of Opening Searchers in the log
org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher- Opening Searcher@1656a258[main]
realtime
also I see a soft commit happening almost
No the client lets solr handle it.
On Jul 7, 2015, at 2:38 PM, Mike Drob mad...@cloudera.com wrote:
Are the clients that are posting updates requesting commits?
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Summer Shire shiresum...@gmail.com wrote:
HI All,
Can someone help me understand
Hi,
When I restart my solr core the log replay starts and just before it finishes I
see the following commit
start
commit{flags=2,optimize=false,openSearcher=true,waitSearcher=true,expungeDeletes=false,softCommit=false,prepareCommit=false}
what does the “flags=2” param do ?
when I try to
. What
version of Solr are you using? Can you confirm that your config is using
the TieredMergePolicy?
Upayavira
Oe, Jun 30, 2015, at 04:48 AM, Summer Shire wrote:
Hi Upayavira and Erick,
There are two things we are talking about here.
First: Why am I optimizing? If I don’t our SEARCH
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015, at 09:37 PM, Summer Shire wrote:
Hi All,
I have two indexers (Independent processes ) writing to a common solr
core.
If One indexer process issued an optimize on the core
I want the second indexer to wait adding docs until the optimize has
finished
existed.
This is, of course, assuming you are using something like Solr 3.5+.
Upayavira
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015, at 08:08 AM, Summer Shire wrote:
Have to cause of performance issues.
Just want to know if there is a way to tap into the status.
On Jun 28, 2015, at 11:37 PM, Upayavira u
Hi All,
I have two indexers (Independent processes ) writing to a common solr core.
If One indexer process issued an optimize on the core
I want the second indexer to wait adding docs until the optimize has finished.
Are there ways I can do this programmatically?
pinging the core when the
Hi All,
I have two indexers (Independent processes ) writing to a common solr core.
If One indexer process issued an optimize on the core
I want the second indexer to wait adding docs until the optimize has finished.
Are there ways I can do this programmatically?
pinging the core when the
Anyone have any suggestions on things I could try ? Does it seem like a solr
bug ?
On Jun 14, 2015, at 9:40 PM, Summer Shire shiresum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Every time I optimize my index with maxSegment=2 after some time the
replication fails to get filelist for a given generation
Hi all,
Every time I optimize my index with maxSegment=2 after some time the
replication fails to get filelist for a given generation. Looks like the index
version and generation count gets messed up.
(If the maxSegment=1 this never happens. I am able to successfully reproduce
this by
...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 4/9/2015 9:51 PM, Summer Shire wrote:
I was adding 1000 docs at a time but later I changed it to 10 and I am still
getting the exception.
The reason I added the integer.max_value code was because I googled for what
could be causing the OOM
and clearly the size of an array
Hi All,
Did anyone get a chance to look at my config and the InfoStream File ?
I am very curious to see what you think
thanks,
Summer
On Mar 6, 2015, at 5:20 PM, Summer Shire shiresum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Here’s more update on where I am at with this.
I enabled infoStream
Hi All,
Here’s more update on where I am at with this.
I enabled infoStream logging and quickly figured that I need to get rid of
maxBufferedDocs. So Erick you
were absolutely right on that.
I increased my ramBufferSize to 100MB
and reduced maxMergeAtOnce to 3 and segmentsPerTier to 3 as well.
Hi All,
I am using solr 4.7.2 is there a bug wrt merging the segments down ?
I recently added the following to my solrConfig.xml
indexConfig
useCompoundFilefalse/useCompoundFile
ramBufferSizeMB100/ramBufferSizeMB
maxBufferedDocs1000/maxBufferedDocs
mergeFactor5/mergeFactor
_think_, but don't know for sure, that the merging stuff doesn't get
triggered until you commit, it doesn't just happen.
Shot in the dark...
Erick
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Summer Shire shiresum...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I am using solr 4.7.2 is there a bug wrt merging the segments
Hi All,
I am using solr 4.7.2 is there a bug wrt merging the segments down ?
I recently added the following to my solrConfig.xml
indexConfig
useCompoundFilefalse/useCompoundFile
ramBufferSizeMB100/ramBufferSizeMB
maxBufferedDocs1000/maxBufferedDocs
mergeFactor5/mergeFactor
Hi All,
My master and slave index version and generation is the same
yet the index is not in sync because when I execute the same query
on both master and slave I see old docs on slave which should not be there.
I also tried to fetch a specific indexversion on slave using
HI Guys,
Is there way to specify the newSearchers and firstSearchers different for
master vs slave ?
listener event=newSearcher class=solr.QuerySenderListener”
listener event=firstSearcher class=solr.QuerySenderListener”
I do not have separate solrConfig.xml for slave vs master.
I simply have
Hi All,
Running solr (4.7.2) locally and hitting the admin page like this works just
fine http://localhost:8983/solr/ http://localhost:8983/solr/##
http://localhost:8983/solr/#
But on my deployment server my path is http://example.org/jetty/MyApp/1/solr/#
proxy
in front?
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Summer Shire shiresum...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Running solr (4.7.2) locally and hitting the admin page like this works
just fine http://localhost:8983/solr/ http://localhost:8983/solr/##
http://localhost:8983/solr/#
But on my
Did u try luke 47
On Jun 6, 2014, at 11:59 PM, Aman Tandon amantandon...@gmail.com wrote:
I also tried with solr 4.2 and with luke version Luke 4.0.0-ALPHA
but got this error:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: A SPI class of type
org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec with name 'Lucene42'
jars so that
the class signature (extends, implements, and constructors) matches the
Solr 4.7.2 jars? I mean, Java is simply complaining that your class is not
a valid value source class of the specified type.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Summer Shire
Sent: Friday, May 23
Hi All,
I have my own popularity value source class
and I let solr know about it via solrconfig.xml
valueSourceParser name=popularity
class=mysolr.sources.PopValueSourceParser /
But then I get the following class cast exception
I have tried to make sure there are no old Solr jar files in
Hi All,
I have my own popularity value source class
and I let solr know about it via solrconfig.xml
valueSourceParser name=popularity
class=mysolr.sources.PopValueSourceParser /
But then I get the following class cast exception
I have tried to make sure there are no old Solr jar files in the
Hi All,
I have a scenario where for example my document titles are
1. battle of the zords
2. joes battle
3. who was in that crazy battle.
and if the search term is [battle]
I want to penalize the second and third document score because battle was
matched further down than in the first
Hi all,
I am using Solr and Lucene 4.5.1
and I have a Payload Similarity that extends DefaultSimilarity
my schema.xml specifies the default Similarity tag
similarity class=mypackage.PayloadSimilarity/
/** my similarity class**/
public class PayloadSimilarity extends DefaultSimilarity {
Thanks Chris for a quick response.
But I verified that I only have the following jars
lucene-analyzers-common-4.5.1
lucene-core-4.5.1
lucene-queries-4.5.1
lucene-spatial-4.5.1
solr-solrj-4.5.1
they are all the same version.
Also how can I verify the classpath ?
Since I do not have other
Hi Shawn and Chris,
your inputs Helped I figured it out from all these links and also what Chris
mentioned.
Thanks,
Summer
On Jan 27, 2014, at 5:54 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 1/27/2014 5:41 PM, Summer Shire wrote:
Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException
31 matches
Mail list logo