Can we get this back ported to 3x?
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Feb 14, 2012, at 3:45 AM, Matthias Käppler wrote:
> hey thanks all for the suggestions, didn't have time to look into them
> yet as we're feature-sprinting for MWC, but will report back with some
> feedback over the next weeks (w
hey thanks all for the suggestions, didn't have time to look into them
yet as we're feature-sprinting for MWC, but will report back with some
feedback over the next weeks (we will have a few more performance
sprints in March)
Best,
Matthias
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
>
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> One way to speed up numeric range queries (at the cost of increased
> index size) is to lower the precisionStep. You could try changing
> this from 8 to 4 and then re-indexing to see how that affects your
> query speed.
Your issue, and the fa
ext:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Improving-performance-for-SOLR-geo-queries-tp3719310p3737861.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2012/2/9 Matthias Käppler :
>
> {!bbox cache=false d=50 sfield=location_ll pt=54.1434,-0.452322}
>
>
>
> WrappedQuery({!cache=false
> cost=0}+location_ll_0_coordinate:[53.69373983225355 TO
> 54.59306016774645] +location_ll_1_coordinate:[-1.2199462259963294 TO
> 0.31530222599632934])
>
>
Yep,
Hi Ryan,
>>I'm trying to understand how you have your data indexed so we can give
>>reasonable direction.
>>
>>What field type are you using for your locations? Is it using the
>>solr spatial field types? What do you see when you look at the debug
>>information from &debugQuery=true?
we query a
I compared locallucene to spatial search and saw a performance
degradation, even using geohash queries, though perhaps I indexed things
wrong? Locallucene across 6 machines handles 150 queries per second fine,
but using geofilt and geohash I got lots of timeouts even when I was doing
only 50 querie
Hi Matthias-
I'm trying to understand how you have your data indexed so we can give
reasonable direction.
What field type are you using for your locations? Is it using the
solr spatial field types? What do you see when you look at the debug
information from &debugQuery=true?
>From my experienc
Hi Erick,
if we're not doing geo searches, we filter by "location tags" that we
attach to places. This is simply a hierachical regional id, which is
simple to filter for, but much less flexible. We use that on Web a
lot, but not on mobile, where we want to performance searches in
arbitrary radii a
So the obvious question is "what is your
performance like without the distance filters?"
Without that knowledge, we have no clue whether
the modifications you've made had any hope of
speeding up your response times
As for the docs, any improvements you'd like to
contribute would be happily re
Hi,
we need to perform fast geo lookups on an index of ~13M places, and
were running into performance problems here with SOLR. We haven't done
a lot of query optimization / SOLR tuning up until now so there's
probably a lot of things we're missing. I was wondering if you could
give me some feedbac
11 matches
Mail list logo
