Hi,
Thank you for your help. The issue is now resolved after using analysis
tool as suggested by Jack and Chris. We used the following filters in the
end for this field:
WordDelimiterFilterFactory does the tric
: After further analysis it was found that the cases in which the search
: works as expected are where the "." is preceded by a number. Whenever, we
: have an alphabet instead of number, the search on the word on right side
: doesn't return results.
Please note Jack's previous suggestion...
>> T
Sorry, a correction. The first part doesn't give results.
SA8182B.BA0850 --> Will have issues when searching on SA8182 -- no
results. searching on BA0850 will give results.
SA8182.BA0850 --> No issues will return results for BA0850 and SA8182.
Regards,
Sohail
Hi,
After further analysis it was found that the cases in which the search
works as expected are where the "." is preceded by a number. Whenever, we
have an alphabet instead of number, the search on the word on right side
doesn't return results.
SA8182B.BA0850 --> Will have issues when searching
as a
> colon, immediately before a term with no white space.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Sohail Aboobaker
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:13 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Inconsistent search results.
>
> Hi,
>
>
, November 21, 2012 8:13 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Inconsistent search results.
Hi,
We have 500k+ documents indexed with many fields. One of the fields is a
simple text filled that is defined as default search field and we copy many
field values into that field.
Some values are
Am 27.06.2011 15:56, schrieb Jihed Amine Maaref:
> - normalizedContents:(EDOUAR* AND une) doesn't return anything
This was discussed few days ago:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Conflict-in-wildcard-query-and-spellchecker-in-solr-search-tt3095198.html
> - normalizedContents:(edouar* AND un)
Hi! I'm new to Apache Solr and trying to make a query using search terms
against a field called "normalizedContents" and of type "text".
All of the search terms must exist in the field. Problem is, I'm getting
inconsistent results.
For example, the solr index has only one document with normalizedCo
Stéphane Corlosquet wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to solr so please let me know if there is a more appropriate place
> for my question below.
>
> I'm noticing a rather unexpected number of results when I add more keywords
> to a search. I'm listing below a example (where I replaced the real keywor
sorry, mm was set to 2<-35%, not 2->25%, but nevermind.
Steph.
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet
wrote:
> Thank you Erick, Markus and Ahmet! That answered my question. Changing the
> value of the mm parameter in solrconfig.xml did have an effect on the 3
> keyword query (it was
Thank you Erick, Markus and Ahmet! That answered my question. Changing the
value of the mm parameter in solrconfig.xml did have an effect on the 3
keyword query (it was set to 2->25%), and removing it entirely forced all
keywords to be present, and the number of hits was decreasing as expected.
I'
Indeed, it's the dismax, i missed it! My bad..
-Original message-
From: Ahmet Arslan
Sent: Thu 09-09-2010 20:37
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
Subject: Re: Inconsistent search results with multiple keywords
> yes, my schema.xml file have defaultOperator="AND"/
> yes, my schema.xml file have defaultOperator="AND"/> which
> is why I thought that the number of hits would decrease
> every time you add a
> keyword.
You are using dismax so, it is determined by mm parameter.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin#mm_.28Minimum_.27Should.27_Match.29
Hi Markus,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> Looks like AND is your defaultOperator [1].
yes, my schema.xml file have which
is why I thought that the number of hits would decrease every time you add a
keyword.
> Check your schema.xml and try
> adding q.op=or to your qu
Hi Erick,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Could you show us the definitions for your fields? I suspect
> you're not getting the tokens you expect. This will almost certainly
> be true if the type is "string" rather than "text".
>
I should mention that I use solr via the
Looks like AND is your defaultOperator [1]. Check your schema.xml and try
adding q.op=or to your query.
[1]: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SearchHandler#q.op
On Thursday 09 September 2010 15:34:52 Stéphane Corlosquet wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to solr so please let me know if there is a more a
Could you show us the definitions for your fields? I suspect
you're not getting the tokens you expect. This will almost certainly
be true if the type is "string" rather than "text".
The solr admin page (especially analysis) will help you a lot here, as
will adding &debugQuery=on to your query and
Hi all,
I'm new to solr so please let me know if there is a more appropriate place
for my question below.
I'm noticing a rather unexpected number of results when I add more keywords
to a search. I'm listing below a example (where I replaced the real keywords
with placeholders):
keyword1 851 hits
18 matches
Mail list logo
