No. This is about 1 Solr server. You don't need to do anything with caches.
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> I don't want to bother but I try to understand that part:
>
> "When yo perform a commit in solr you h
I don't want to bother but I try to understand that part:
"When yo perform a commit in solr you have (for an instant) two versions of
the index. The commit produces new segments (with new documents, new
deletions, etc). After creating these new segments a new index searcher is
created and its cach
Yesterday, we spent 1 hour with a client looking at their cluster's
performance metrics SPM, their indexing logs, etc. trying to figure
out why some indexing was slower than it should have been. We traced
issues to network hickups, to VMs that would move from host to host,
etc. Really fancy and p
Furkan, see this post.
http://grokbase.com/t/lucene/solr-user/117t1eswyk/multiple-solr-servers-and-a-shared-index-again
Cumprimentos
--
Yago Riveiro
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
On Tuesday, April 16, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> Hi Walter;
>
> You sai
Hi Walter;
You said: "It is not safe to share Solr index files between two Solr
servers". Why do you think like that?
2013/4/16 Tim Vaillancourt
> If centralization of storage is your goal by choosing NFS, iSCSI works
> reasonably well with SOLR indexes, although good local-storage will always
If centralization of storage is your goal by choosing NFS, iSCSI works
reasonably well with SOLR indexes, although good local-storage will
always be the overall winner.
I noticed a near 5% degredation in overall search performance (casual
testing, nothing scientific) when moving a 40-50GB inde
Solr 4.2 does have field compression which makes smaller indexes. That will
reduce the amount of network traffic. That probably does not help much, because
I think the latency of NFS is what causes problems.
wunder
On Apr 15, 2013, at 9:52 AM, Ali, Saqib wrote:
> Hello Walter,
>
> Thanks for
Hello Walter,
Thanks for the response. That has been my experience in the past as well.
But I was wondering if there new are things in Solr 4 and NFS 4.1 that make
the storing of indexes on a NFS mount feasible.
Thanks,
Saqib
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> On Apr 15
On Apr 15, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Ali, Saqib wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Are there any issues with storing Solr Indexes on a NFS share? Also any
> recommendations for using NFS for Solr indexes?
I recommend that you do not put Solr indexes on NFS.
It can be very slow, I measured indexing as 100X slower
