example only group documents with the value
> image for the mimetype field. This filter should be specified per
> group command. Maybe we should open an issue for this?
>
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Selective-Result-Grouping-tp3391538p3491886.ht
do not want to collapse videos
> or webpages, only images.
>
> I've attached a screenshot of google's srp to help explain what I mean.
>
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n3471548/Screen_Shot_2011-11-01_at_11.52.04_AM.png
>
> Hopefully that makes more sense.
t_11.52.04_AM.png
Hopefully that makes more sense. If it's still not clear I can email you
privately.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Selective-Result-Grouping-tp3391538p3471548.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> The current grouping functionality using group.field is basically
> all-or-nothing: all documents will be grouped by the field value or none
> will. So there would be no way to, for example, collapse just the videos or
> images like they do in google.
When using the group.field option values must
this in a sharded
environment, but like most other features, it could be available in a single
shard first and work toward supporting it in a sharded env.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Selective-Result-Grouping-tp3391538p3429618.html
Sent from the Solr - User ma
oughts on the subject before submitting a
> ticket to jira. Thoughts?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Selective-Result-Grouping-tp3391538p3391538.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Martijn van Groningen
t are produced). I have yet to come up
with a scenario where the group.query could not be accomplished by using the
other group params and fq.
I'm hoping to collect some thoughts on the subject before submitting a
ticket to jira. Thoughts?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066
