.apache.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2009 5:18:26 PM
>> Subject: Re: Snapinstaller vs Solr Restart
>>
>>
>> I'm optimizing because I thought I should. I'll be updating my index
>> somewhere between every 15 minutes, and every 2 hours. That means between
r-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2009 5:18:26 PM
> Subject: Re: Snapinstaller vs Solr Restart
>
>
> I'm optimizing because I thought I should. I'll be updating my index
> somewhere between every 15 minutes, and every 2 hours. That means between 12
> an
n't turn off autowarming the way you have.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Snapinstaller-vs-Solr-Restart-tp21315273p21320334.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
27;ve used Varnish with great results. Squid is another option.
-Todd Feak
-Original Message-
From: wojtekpia [mailto:wojte...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 1:20 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Snapinstaller vs Solr Restart
I use my warm up queries to fill the f
off autowarming the way you have.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: wojtekpia
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2009 4:20:18 PM
> Subject: Re: Snapinstaller vs Solr Restart
>
>
sn't that imply that you have
> very low hit rate and therefore don't care to autowarm? And if you have a
> very low hit rate, then perhaps caches are not needed at all?
>
>
> How about this. Do you optimize your index at any point?
>
--
View this message in context:
u optimize your index at any point?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: wojtekpia
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2009 1:07:28 PM
> Subject: RE: Snapinstaller vs Solr Restart
>
>
and the post-commit behavior. This
> affects what's in memory, caches, etc.
>
> -Todd Feak
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Snapinstaller-vs-Solr-Restart-tp21315273p21315654.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From: wojtekpia [mailto:wojte...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:46 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Snapinstaller vs Solr Restart
I'm running load tests against my Solr instance. I find that it
typically
takes ~10 minutes for my Solr setup to "warm-up" w
ff
restarting Solr rather than running Snapinstaller.
Any ideas why?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Snapinstaller-vs-Solr-Restart-tp21315273p21315273.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
10 matches
Mail list logo