Tri:
What is the volume of content (# of documents) and index size you are
expecting? What about the document complexity in terms of # of fields, what
are you storing in the index, complexity of the queries etc?
We have used SOLR with 10m documents with 1-3 second response times on the
front end
Hi,
You can find benchmark results but these are not directly based on "index
size vs. response time"
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceData
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Tri Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I remember going through some page that had graphs of response times based
> on index
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 03:06 +0100, Tri Nguyen wrote:
> I remember going through some page that had graphs of response times based on
> index size for solr.
>
> Anyone know of such pages?
Sorry, no. Some small scale tests with our corpus showed that response
times suffered less than proportional
I would shard the index so that each shard is no larger than the memory of the
machine it sits on, that way your entire index will be in memory all the time.
When I was at Feedster (I wrote the search engine), the rule of thumb I had was
to have 14GB of index on a 16GB machine.
François
On Dec
Hi,
I remember going through some page that had graphs of response times based on
index size for solr.
Anyone know of such pages?
Internally, we have some requirements for response times and I'm trying to
figure out when to shard the index.
Thanks,
Tri
: Here it is again, but the mailing list might strip attachments.
: It is very easy to build your own using the instructions in the FAQ.
in general, the Apache mailing lists strip attachments. In my experience
plain text attachments seem to be okay, as long as they aren't too big and
have the mi
Here it is again, but the mailing list might strip attachments.
It is very easy to build your own using the instructions in the FAQ.
wunder
On 11/9/06 11:02 AM, "Joachim Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Walter,
>
> Thunderbird shows that there is an attachment to this message in the
> me
Hi Walter,
Thunderbird shows that there is an attachment to this message in the
message list, but when I view
the message, no attachment is available. Could you try sending this
attachment again?
Thanks --Joachim
Walter Underwood wrote:
I've done some testing using JMeter. I followed the
Le 06-11-06 à 12:21, Kevin Lewandowski a écrit :
As of today Solr is running under Tomcat on a single dedicated box.
It's a 2.66Ghz P4, with 1 gig ram. The index has about 1.2 million
documents and is 1.2 gigs in size. This machine handles 250,000
queries per day with no problem. CPU load stays
Le 06-11-06 à 12:50, Walter Underwood a écrit :
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-jmeter/JMeterFAQ
I'm attaching the script I built with this. A few notes:
Well, I doesn't get the script...
I was very pleased with the Solr performance in my testing.
With our small corpus (65K docs) I was
On 11/6/06 6:28 AM, "Nicolas St-Laurent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there any Solr benchmarks available somewhere ? I would like to
> know how well it performs. I understand that it depends on the
> hardware config and on the application server used. Just to g
es 250,000
queries per day with no problem. CPU load stays around 0.15 most of
the time.
I hope that is helpful to you.
Kevin
On 11/6/06, Nicolas St-Laurent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Is there any Solr benchmarks available somewhere ? I would like to
know how well it performs. I un
The performance data on the wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/
SolrPerformanceData) are a little short to get a good idea.
Le 06-11-06 à 09:28, Nicolas St-Laurent a écrit :
Hello,
Is there any Solr benchmarks available somewhere ? I would like to
know how well it performs. I understand
Hello,
Is there any Solr benchmarks available somewhere ? I would like to
know how well it performs. I understand that it depends on the
hardware config and on the application server used. Just to got an
idea...
Thank you,
Nicolas
14 matches
Mail list logo
