Thanks Hoss got the point.
Bhaumik Joshi
From: Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org>
Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 4:52 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Disabling solr scoring
: Can you please elaborate? I am passing user defined sort field and order
wh
: Can you please elaborate? I am passing user defined sort field and order
whenever i search.
I think Mikhail just missunderstood your question -- he was giving an
example of how to override the default sort (which uses score) with one
that would ensure scores are not computed.
: > Is there
Can you please elaborate? I am passing user defined sort field and order
whenever i search.
Thanks & Regards,
Bhaumik Joshi
From: Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 4:13 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Disabling solr sco
What about
sort=_docid_ asc
?
08 июля 2016 г. 13:50 пользователь "Bhaumik Joshi" <
bhaumik.jo...@outlook.com> написал:
> Hi,
>
>
> Is there any way to completely disable scoring in solr cloud as i am
> always passing sort parameter whenever i search.
>
> And disabling scoring will improve
Hi,
Is there any way to completely disable scoring in solr cloud as i am always
passing sort parameter whenever i search.
And disabling scoring will improve performance?
Thanks & Regards,
Bhaumik Joshi
We are getting inconsistent scoring results in Solr. It works about 95% of
the time, where a search on one term returns the results which equal exactly
that one term at the top, and results with multiple terms that also contain
that one term are returned lower. Occasionally, however, if a subset
Hi Scott,
Try optimizing after reindexing and this should go away. Had to do with
updated/deleted docs participating in score computation.
Otis
On Feb 13, 2015, at 18:29, Scott Johnson sjohn...@dag.com wrote:
We are getting inconsistent scoring results in Solr. It works about 95% of
the
Hi All,
I have a scenario where for example my document titles are
1. battle of the zords
2. joes battle
3. who was in that crazy battle.
and if the search term is [battle]
I want to penalize the second and third document score because battle was
matched further down than in the first
Hi,
I am releasing an new version (0.6) of vifun, a GUI to help visually tweak
Solr scoring. Most relevant changes are:
- support float values
- add support for tie
- synch both Current/Baseline scrollbars (if some checkbox is selected)
- doubleclick in a doc: show side by side comparison
This was a common one when I was matching movie and song names. If
that is your project, also try boosting if it's the first word or on
shorter titles. Also try bigrams of stopwords: Call of the Wild
becomes call, of-the, wild.
The bigrams trick is also good if you have people block-copying large
another way is to use payload http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Payloads
the advantage of payload is that you only need one field and can make frq
file smaller than use two fields. but the disadvantage is payload is stored
in prx file, so I am not sure which one is fast. maybe you can try them
both.
On
Thanks a lot. I had already implemented Walter's solution and was wondering
if this was the right way to deal with it. This has now given me the
confidence to go with the solution.
Many thanks.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
GAH! I had my head in
Hi,
I have a field in my index called itemDesc which i am applying
EnglishMinimalStemFilterFactory to. So if i index a value to this field
containing Edges, the EnglishMinimalStemFilterFactory applies stemming
and Edges becomes Edge. Now when i search for Edges, documents with
Edge score better
No, I don't think there's an OOB way to make this happen. It's
a recurring theme, make exact matches score higher than
stemmed matches.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Kissue Kissue kissue...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a field in my index called itemDesc which i am applying
It is easy. Create two fields, text_exact and text_stem. Don't use the stemmer
in the first chain, do use the stemmer in the second. Give the text_exact a
bigger weight than text_stem.
wunder
On Apr 12, 2012, at 4:34 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
No, I don't think there's an OOB way to make this
GAH! I had my head in make this happen in one field when I wrote my
response, without being explicit. Of course Walter's solution is pretty
much the standard way to deal with this.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org wrote:
It is easy. Create two
filter queries (fq) are not included for score calculation, just the
query in q parameter is used for this purpose. That's why although
you get the same results, lucene will just use q=*:* in your 1st query
and q=tag:car in your 2nd query to calculate the scores. As you can
see since both
I'm getting different results running these queries:
http://localhost:8080/solr/select?q=*:*fq=source:wikifq=tag:carsort=score+desc,dateSubmitted+ascfl=title,score,dateSubmittedrows=100
hey,
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Christopher Gross cogr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm getting different results running these queries:
http://localhost:8080/solr/select?q=*:*fq=source:wikifq=tag:carsort=score+desc,dateSubmitted+ascfl=title,score,dateSubmittedrows=100
a new parameter in the formula to
boost the score of the most recent document.
What is the best way to do this ?
Thanks.
Excuse for my english.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/modify-SOLR-scoring-tp23198326p23198326.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
Message-
From: Bertrand DUMAS-PILHOU [mailto:bdum...@eurocortex.fr]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: modify SOLR scoring
Hi everybody,
I'm using SOLR with a schema (for example) like this:
parutiondate, date, indexed, not stored
fulltext
want to use.
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand DUMAS-PILHOU [mailto:bdum...@eurocortex.fr]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: modify SOLR scoring
Hi everybody,
I'm using SOLR with a schema (for example) like
Are the score values generated in Solr relative to the index or are they
against an absolute standard?
Is it possible to create a scoring algorithm with this property? Are there
parts of the score inputs that are absolute?
My use case is this: I would like to do a parallel search against two
Indexes cannot be directly compared unless they have similar collection
statistics. That is the same terms occur with the same frequency
across all indexes and the average document lengths are about the same
(though the default similarity in Lucene may not care about average
document
24 matches
Mail list logo
