Well, how it's marked really has little to do with whether it
gets addressed or not. The nature of Open Source software
is that it's, well, open. If this is a big enough pain point for
you, you can pull the code and fix it. Whether you then
submit a patch for review/commit is up to you.
There are
Thank you for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12691.
I see it's marked as minor. Can we bump up the priority please ?
The example of 2 cores ingest + transientCacheSize==1 was provided for
reproduction reference only, and is not running in not production.
Production setup on AWS use
On 8/22/2018 7:09 PM, mmb1234 wrote:
The original post clarified the current state. "we have about 75 cores with
"transientCacheSize" set to 32". If transientCacheSize is increased to match
current cores, we'll differ the issue. It's going to hit 100's cores per
solr instance shortly.
Majority o
> Having 100+ cores on a Solr node and a transient cache size of 1
The original post clarified the current state. "we have about 75 cores with
"transientCacheSize" set to 32". If transientCacheSize is increased to match
current cores, we'll differ the issue. It's going to hit 100's cores per
sol
Then until you can try to fix the code, you need to increase your
transient cache size.
Having 100+ cores on a Solr node and a transient cache size of 1 to
"so jvm heap and os filecache is aligned to a manageable number of
open cores we can serve" implies that you are trying to compensate
for an
> The problem here is that you may have M requests queued up for the _same_
core, each with a new update request.
With transientCacheSize ==1, as soon as the update request for Core B is
received, Core B encounters data corruption not Core A. Both Core A and Core
B are receiving update requets.
It should not be required that your transient core size is greater
than or equal to the number of simultaneous updates.
Theoretically, it works like this:
- A request comes in and a reference-counted core is opened to serve
it. That may require loading the core.
- If another request comes in that
On 8/16/2018 7:14 PM, Michael Hu (CMBU) wrote:
Environment:
* solr 7.4.1
* all cores are vanilla cores with "loadOnStartUp" set to false, and
"transient" set to true
* we have about 75 cores with "transientCacheSize" set to 32
Issue: we have core corruption from time to time (2-
t; From: Michael Hu (CMBU)
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 1:22 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: Mohsin Beg
> Subject: Re: Solr core corrupted for version 7.4.0, please help!
>
>
>
> Can someone advise me how to solve this issue?
>
> Thank you!
>
> --
Can someone advise me how to solve this issue, please?
Thank you so much!
--Michael
From: Michael Hu (CMBU)
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 1:22 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Mohsin Beg
Subject: Re: Solr core corrupted for version 7.4.0, please help
Can someone advise me how to solve this issue?
Thank you!
--Michael
From: Michael Hu (CMBU)
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 6:14 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Mohsin Beg
Subject: Solr core corrupted for version 7.4.0, please help!
Environment
Environment:
* solr 7.4.1
* all cores are vanilla cores with "loadOnStartUp" set to false, and
"transient" set to true
* we have about 75 cores with "transientCacheSize" set to 32
Issue: we have core corruption from time to time (2-3 core corruption a day)
How to reproduce:
*
12 matches
Mail list logo