RE: Were changes made to facetting on multivalued fields recently?

2014-04-11 Thread Jean-Sebastien Vachon
0-14 1:54 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Were changes made to facetting on multivalued fields recently? > > bq: The SQL query contains a Replace statement that does this > > Well, I suspect that's where the issue is. The facet values being reported >

Re: Were changes made to facetting on multivalued fields recently?

2014-04-10 Thread Erick Erickson
3 AM, Jean-Sebastien Vachon wrote: > The SQL query contains a Replace statement that does this > >> -Original Message- >> From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org] >> Sent: April-10-14 11:30 AM >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Were c

RE: Were changes made to facetting on multivalued fields recently?

2014-04-10 Thread Jean-Sebastien Vachon
The SQL query contains a Replace statement that does this > -Original Message- > From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org] > Sent: April-10-14 11:30 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Were changes made to facetting on multivalued fields recently? >

Re: Were changes made to facetting on multivalued fields recently?

2014-04-10 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 4/10/2014 9:14 AM, Jean-Sebastien Vachon wrote: > Here are the field definitions for both our old and new index... as you can > see that are identical. We've been using this chain and field type starting > with Solr 1.4 and never had any problem. As for the documents, both indexes > are using

RE: Were changes made to facetting on multivalued fields recently?

2014-04-10 Thread Jean-Sebastien Vachon
Thanks for your time > -Original Message- > From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org] > Sent: April-09-14 5:23 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Were changes made to facetting on multivalued fields recently? > > On 4/9/2014 2:15 PM, Erick Erickso

Re: Were changes made to facetting on multivalued fields recently?

2014-04-09 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 4/9/2014 2:15 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: Right, but the response in the doc when you make a request is almost, but not quite totally, unrelated to how facet values are tallied. It's all about what tokens are actually in your index, which you can see in the "schema browser"... Supplement to wh

Re: Were changes made to facetting on multivalued fields recently?

2014-04-09 Thread Erick Erickson
: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] >> Sent: April-09-14 2:21 PM >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Were changes made to facetting on multivalued fields recently? >> >> That is...um...very strange. It looks to me like you have somehow indexed a &

RE: Were changes made to facetting on multivalued fields recently?

2014-04-09 Thread Jean-Sebastien Vachon
d&fq=ad_job_type_id:[*%20TO%20*]&facet=on&facet.field=ad_job_type_id&rows=1 4 5 1 > -Original Message- > From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] > Sent: April-09-14 2:21 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Were chang

Re: Were changes made to facetting on multivalued fields recently?

2014-04-09 Thread Erick Erickson
That is...um...very strange. It looks to me like you have somehow indexed a bunch of new values. I'm guessing here, but it's suspicious that you have a value "4,1" should that have been indexed as "4" and "1" as separate tokens? So here's what I'd do 1> take a look at the solr/admin/schema browser

Were changes made to facetting on multivalued fields recently?

2014-04-09 Thread Jean-Sebastien Vachon
Hi All, We just discovered that the response from Solr (4.7.1) when faceting on one of our multi-valued fields has changed considerably. In the past (4.6.1 and prior versions as well) we used to have something like this: (there are 7 possible values for this attribute) 11454652 11387070 20